![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm looking at combining my 29 gallon and 46 gallon fish/reef tanks into a
75 gallon fish/reef tank. I saw these two sumps but can't decide which would be better for the 75 gallon tank: http://www.petsolutions.com/Small+Pr...076024-I-.aspx http://www.drsfostersmith.com/Produc...1&N=2004&Nty=1 One is a Pro-Clear mud sump and the other is a Megaflow sump filter. Any opinions on which way to go?? Thanks, Susan ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those are wet dry filters, and unless you are going with
big eaters, you are better off with a sump instead of a wet dry filter. People have come up with a variety of sump designs with glued in baffles and such, but my suggestion is to use a regular fish tank and don't drill or glue in any thing. Then it is completely versital, and can even be used later as an aquarium. I like using live rock rubble for filtering out the bubbles. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Susan wrote on 9/18/2006 4:39 PM: I'm looking at combining my 29 gallon and 46 gallon fish/reef tanks into a 75 gallon fish/reef tank. I saw these two sumps but can't decide which would be better for the 75 gallon tank: http://www.petsolutions.com/Small+Pr...076024-I-.aspx http://www.drsfostersmith.com/Produc...1&N=2004&Nty=1 One is a Pro-Clear mud sump and the other is a Megaflow sump filter. Any opinions on which way to go?? Thanks, Susan ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep. What happens is that it is so efficient that it out
competes the bacteria on the outside of the rock and sand, so that denitrification dos not take place as well inside of the rock and sand. PS don't mention to Stoutman that I mentioned the word "denitrification" heheheheh :-) Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Susan wrote on 9/18/2006 5:57 PM: Thanks Wayne. Are nitrates the problem using one of these type filters? Susan ![]() "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ink.net... Those are wet dry filters, and unless you are going with big eaters, you are better off with a sump instead of a wet dry filter. People have come up with a variety of sump designs with glued in baffles and such, but my suggestion is to use a regular fish tank and don't drill or glue in any thing. Then it is completely versital, and can even be used later as an aquarium. I like using live rock rubble for filtering out the bubbles. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Susan wrote on 9/18/2006 4:39 PM: I'm looking at combining my 29 gallon and 46 gallon fish/reef tanks into a 75 gallon fish/reef tank. I saw these two sumps but can't decide which would be better for the 75 gallon tank: http://www.petsolutions.com/Small+Pr...076024-I-.aspx http://www.drsfostersmith.com/Produc...1&N=2004&Nty=1 One is a Pro-Clear mud sump and the other is a Megaflow sump filter. Any opinions on which way to go?? Thanks, Susan ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Sallee wrote:
Yep. What happens is that it is so efficient that it out competes the bacteria on the outside of the rock and sand, so that denitrification dos not take place as well inside of the rock and sand. Right, but isn't there other bacteria in the live rock and sand that eat nitrates? Don't get me wrong, I do *not* think you should buy a wet/dry when you have enough live rock to do the job, but don't see why someone who already has a wet/dry filter should get rid of it. George Patterson All successes in conservation are temporary. All defeats are permanent. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But you need the bacteria on the outside taking up oxygen
so that the bacteria in the rock have a low oxygen environment to do the denitrification. You can't have a low oxygen environment if you don't have the aerobic bacteria consuming the oxygen. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets George Patterson wrote on 9/18/2006 6:31 PM: Wayne Sallee wrote: Yep. What happens is that it is so efficient that it out competes the bacteria on the outside of the rock and sand, so that denitrification dos not take place as well inside of the rock and sand. Right, but isn't there other bacteria in the live rock and sand that eat nitrates? Don't get me wrong, I do *not* think you should buy a wet/dry when you have enough live rock to do the job, but don't see why someone who already has a wet/dry filter should get rid of it. George Patterson All successes in conservation are temporary. All defeats are permanent. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George. I will put it easier terms for you so you understand. The aerobic
bacteria EAT the oxygen. For aerobic bacteria oxygen is GOOD ![]() For anaerobic bacteria oxygen is BAD ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you think the Pro Clear mud sump would be any better? I know it still
has bio-balls but I liked the idea of having a "refugium" in it for macro algae etc.. Thanks, Susan ![]() "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ink.net... Yep. What happens is that it is so efficient that it out competes the bacteria on the outside of the rock and sand, so that denitrification dos not take place as well inside of the rock and sand. PS don't mention to Stoutman that I mentioned the word "denitrification" heheheheh :-) Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Susan wrote on 9/18/2006 5:57 PM: Thanks Wayne. Are nitrates the problem using one of these type filters? Susan ![]() "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ink.net... Those are wet dry filters, and unless you are going with big eaters, you are better off with a sump instead of a wet dry filter. People have come up with a variety of sump designs with glued in baffles and such, but my suggestion is to use a regular fish tank and don't drill or glue in any thing. Then it is completely versital, and can even be used later as an aquarium. I like using live rock rubble for filtering out the bubbles. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Susan wrote on 9/18/2006 4:39 PM: I'm looking at combining my 29 gallon and 46 gallon fish/reef tanks into a 75 gallon fish/reef tank. I saw these two sumps but can't decide which would be better for the 75 gallon tank: http://www.petsolutions.com/Small+Pr...076024-I-.aspx http://www.drsfostersmith.com/Produc...1&N=2004&Nty=1 One is a Pro-Clear mud sump and the other is a Megaflow sump filter. Any opinions on which way to go?? Thanks, Susan ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Susan" wrote in
: Do you think the Pro Clear mud sump would be any better? I know it still has bio-balls but I liked the idea of having a "refugium" in it for macro algae etc.. Thanks, Susan ![]() "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ink.net... Yep. What happens is that it is so efficient that it out competes the bacteria on the outside of the rock and sand, so that denitrification dos not take place as well inside of the rock and sand. PS don't mention to Stoutman that I mentioned the word "denitrification" heheheheh :-) Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Susan wrote on 9/18/2006 5:57 PM: Thanks Wayne. Are nitrates the problem using one of these type filters? Susan ![]() "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ink.net... Those are wet dry filters, and unless you are going with big eaters, you are better off with a sump instead of a wet dry filter. People have come up with a variety of sump designs with glued in baffles and such, but my suggestion is to use a regular fish tank and don't drill or glue in any thing. Then it is completely versital, and can even be used later as an aquarium. I like using live rock rubble for filtering out the bubbles. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Susan wrote on 9/18/2006 4:39 PM: I'm looking at combining my 29 gallon and 46 gallon fish/reef tanks into a 75 gallon fish/reef tank. I saw these two sumps but can't decide which would be better for the 75 gallon tank: http://www.petsolutions.com/Small+Pr...-I-85076024-I-. aspx http://www.drsfostersmith.com/Produc...m?pcatid=13648 &Ntt=sump&Ntk=All&Ntx=mode+matchallpartial&Np=1&N= 2004&Nty=1 One is a Pro-Clear mud sump and the other is a Megaflow sump filter. Any opinions on which way to go?? Thanks, Susan ![]() You can easily make a partitioned sump out of one of your tanks if you like. I just had the local hardware store cut some window glass to the right size and siliconed it into place. Works great and saves money. Mark |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why buy something that is designed with parts that will
get in your way, when you can buy something versitile and easily ad what you need? Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Susan wrote on 9/18/2006 9:04 PM: Do you think the Pro Clear mud sump would be any better? I know it still has bio-balls but I liked the idea of having a "refugium" in it for macro algae etc.. Thanks, Susan ![]() "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ink.net... Yep. What happens is that it is so efficient that it out competes the bacteria on the outside of the rock and sand, so that denitrification dos not take place as well inside of the rock and sand. PS don't mention to Stoutman that I mentioned the word "denitrification" heheheheh :-) Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Susan wrote on 9/18/2006 5:57 PM: Thanks Wayne. Are nitrates the problem using one of these type filters? Susan ![]() "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ink.net... Those are wet dry filters, and unless you are going with big eaters, you are better off with a sump instead of a wet dry filter. People have come up with a variety of sump designs with glued in baffles and such, but my suggestion is to use a regular fish tank and don't drill or glue in any thing. Then it is completely versital, and can even be used later as an aquarium. I like using live rock rubble for filtering out the bubbles. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Susan wrote on 9/18/2006 4:39 PM: I'm looking at combining my 29 gallon and 46 gallon fish/reef tanks into a 75 gallon fish/reef tank. I saw these two sumps but can't decide which would be better for the 75 gallon tank: http://www.petsolutions.com/Small+Pr...076024-I-.aspx http://www.drsfostersmith.com/Produc...1&N=2004&Nty=1 One is a Pro-Clear mud sump and the other is a Megaflow sump filter. Any opinions on which way to go?? Thanks, Susan ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sump for a 29 gallon | news | Reefs | 4 | November 18th 03 08:46 AM |
Reduce Sump Refill Maintenance, cheap way | wolfhedd | General | 4 | November 7th 03 06:17 PM |
BETTER IDEA - Reduce Sump Refill Maintenance, cheap way | Dave Cobb | General | 9 | November 4th 03 06:26 AM |
sump, overflow, and circulation questions | Jeff Bartig From: | Reefs | 2 | August 21st 03 03:21 PM |
WTB / Trade in sump skimmers / lighting.... D/FW | Dave C | Reefs | 1 | August 3rd 03 01:18 AM |