Privacy Service Or Pedo Service?

On Jul 14, 12:36 pm, "TomBa +NP-f36+" wrote:
Anonymous Sender wrote etacolo.com:

Normal adults aren't "turned on" by naked kids,
and the world doesn't share your abnormal infatuation with prepubescent
pieces of ass either

How many "normal adults" have you surveyed to determine what "turns them
on?" What definitions and criteria did your survey employ?

You might be interested in reading an actual scientific survey on this
subject:

Title: Sexual Arousal and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a
Community Sample of Normal Men
Author(s): Gordon C. Nagayama Hall, Richard Hirschman, and Lori L. Oliver
Affiliation: Kent State University, Ohio
Citation: Hall, G.C.N., Hirschman, R., & Oliver, L.L., "Sexual Arousal
and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a Community Sample of Normal
Men," Behavior Therapy, Vol. 26, 1995, pp. 681-694

http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library...8_article.html

The results of this study of "normal men" found that:

"Over 1/4 of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest or
exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equaled or exceeded
arousal to adult stimuli."

But noted that "arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily
correspond with pedophilic behavior."

The advertisement and entertainment industries recognize this and employ
it to their advantage.

I lack citations, but numerous anthropolists have noted prevelance of
adult-juvenile sexual attraction across cultures and species. It serves
to increase the survival of the species when extra attention is provided
to the vunerable juveniles.

So, unless all of the above are wrong, your contention that "normal
adults aren't turned on by naked kids" seems to be mistaken. Perhaps you
should examine your definitions, and/or identify your source of guilt.

TomBa NP-f36

Anonymous pedophile "tomba" has been posting his pseudo scientific
crapola for years and still he defends the indefensible.