Remailers becoming useless

New disclaimers would just get written into the filter. Look at one of
your user. Her accounts thru trasher can be identified and traced, and
then filtered due to abuse and spam.

these are accounts that has been traced.





Among others she uses. She use remailers to commit felonies and to
post child porn to various groups because she is an ahteists and she
believes that this will chase away any christians in rec.ponds

Besides in post 911 paranoid america nothing is private nor
confidential. Here and abroad. Paranoia should be a good example.
If you want to post something but dont want to be caught. Then don't
post it.




Thrasher Admin wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 07:16:47 +0200,

wrote:

In Mark Hanaford
wrote:
I'm finding that the spam guards are learning how to check the headers
for things like

"This message did not originate from the above address. It was
automatically remailed by one or more anonymous mail services. This
service is free. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
address below."

and the word "remailer" anywhere in the headers.

I can't get a message through at all now.

Are there any that do not have these or at least that change the phrase
randomly?


sounds like a good idea.

if such disclaimers could be written without using any of:

anon
anonymous
anonymizing
remail
remailed
remailer
This message did not originate from the above address


then the messages would have better chance to get through.
just needs several more ways of saying the same thing only without using
any of the text that mail & news servers are filtering on.

I, for one, have no objection to using a variety of disclaimers.
Throw me a few ideas and see if we can come up with something.

- - --
Cheers,
Thrasher.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEVAwUBQt73WWe9vBuCUlx7AQGILgf+LAkLKO8br5hVpEUMRk 04/15nBH1J826+
lDsUtMFcEjWYdpS4kzI7+9dm9OJWTpJvmu9VDE3RfZvJ293FuL aX1mQYnAx8M5BS
71r0/ha36ey4F1W3FCrTYpQSWRGjX0jwn/nUvYE3ir+z3rDvFWCW48PMniharkFW
hkkixtc38W5J2oNe5Mi13j/eOyKM0p8C8CnHfHSDgTMAi01K8CTrAzUQWMXvWND9
InQItvp1Gda6NhpGVmRLbz5EyUtUdE/ogZ3buit0o9D9g75JOCGdZfQC5XCtVhX6
up5g1BDl4i05eg4tIarbBSdZCsxcOH8iNacmqPU96xBKezaDH5 jIig==
=3r89
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Zax wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 21 Jul 2005 04:14:25 -0000, Mark Hanaford wrote in
Message-Id: :

Are there any that do not have these or at least that change the phrase
randomly?

A couple have slightly different disclaimers.

To change it randomly would be a deliberate effort to defeat filters, I
don't think that's ethical. (Alan Conor excluded).



You are thinking in the original purpose of anon-remailers, not usage.
Many use remailer to avoid killfiles. The problem is, that since
remailers are abused as well, they are now filtered out by many ISP.

Take the case of Carol Witkowski of dogptch tn. She abuse her ISP which
was HOTN or heartoft.net By nym-shifting to avoid kill files and
filters. When she comitted a felony, because she was traced to the ISP,
her ISP canned her account. Now she uses anonymous remailers to
continue to comit crime using free newsservers as well. The decent NSP
admins canned her free accounts, spam servers like shared secrets let
her continue. Her anonymous accounts have been traced, and she craping
in her adult diapers now, and that why you will read from her on these
groups about tracability, and when you guys give her the wrong reply,
she feels secure and continue with her life of Internet crime.

At one time remailers may have served it purpose, but not anymore.