A Fishkeeping forum. FishKeepingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishKeepingBanter.com forum » rec.aquaria.freshwater » Cichlids
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Need filter suggestion for cichlid tank



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 14th 05, 01:12 AM
George Pontis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Need filter suggestion for cichlid tank

I have a fairly newly setup cichlid tank, and thinking that my filtration is
marginal. The tank is 125G nominal capacity but actual water volume is more like
100 gallons. Size is 6' long, 18" wide, and 20" high. The population consists of
six 3.5" to 5.5" Lake Malawi cichlids, mostly peacocks, no mbuna. Also six 3.5" to
4.5" clown loaches and a 6-7" common plecostomus. There is an assortment of plants
around the sides and back. Substrate is 3-5mm smooth quartz gravel. Large pieces
of slate are stacked on the right and left sides two high with maybe 2" gaps. (The
clown loaches favor the bottom story on the left.)

Filtration is a single Fluval 404 drawing from a suction tube at the right side
and low. The return is split three ways: two Marineland Pro30 near the middle of
the tank and the Fluval return nozzle at the left side. The nozzle gets most of
the flow, maybe 50% of the total 340GPH. This filter is rated for 100 gallons
maximum, and at this rate the filter could turn over the tank around 3 times per
hour. I assume that the biowheels add significant extra biological capacity.
Marineland rates them for 30 gallons each.

I don't think there is really enough flow in the tank to effectively draw debris
from one side of the tank to the other and into the filter inlet. Especially with
the rockwork, I don't know if the filter is going to create any meaningful flow
under and between the slates. I recently took apart much of the rockwork to do a
thorough gravel vacuuming and found several pockets of junk. It was a lot of work
and I wouldn't want to have to do this for every gravel vacuuming. My thinking is
to add additional circulation or filtration, but am unsure how the fish would like
that or how effective it might be. The tank is too close to the wall to use a
hang-on overflow or behind the tank filter of any type.

Any comments or suggestions ?

George
  #2  
Old September 14th 05, 01:54 AM
kay-bee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Not necessarily a filter, but for added water flow/current you could add a
power head or two.
Decently placed, the water flow provided by the power head can assist in
preventing waste from settling on the substrate and direct it to the general
area of your intakes. There are a wide variety of power heads out there, the
one I use has a measured flow of 295gph.

Lots of options for filters. Aquaclear 110 power filters are rated at 500gph
(probably somewhat reduced when loaded with media), and definately provide
some movement as well. I've got two of those on my 125g in addition to an
XP3 canister and a generic 330gph HOB.

kay-bee

"George Pontis" wrote in message
t...
I have a fairly newly setup cichlid tank, and thinking that my filtration
is
marginal. The tank is 125G nominal capacity but actual water volume is
more like
100 gallons. Size is 6' long, 18" wide, and 20" high. The population
consists of
six 3.5" to 5.5" Lake Malawi cichlids, mostly peacocks, no mbuna. Also six
3.5" to
4.5" clown loaches and a 6-7" common plecostomus. There is an assortment
of plants
around the sides and back. Substrate is 3-5mm smooth quartz gravel. Large
pieces
of slate are stacked on the right and left sides two high with maybe 2"
gaps. (The
clown loaches favor the bottom story on the left.)

Filtration is a single Fluval 404 drawing from a suction tube at the right
side
and low. The return is split three ways: two Marineland Pro30 near the
middle of
the tank and the Fluval return nozzle at the left side. The nozzle gets
most of
the flow, maybe 50% of the total 340GPH. This filter is rated for 100
gallons
maximum, and at this rate the filter could turn over the tank around 3
times per
hour. I assume that the biowheels add significant extra biological
capacity.
Marineland rates them for 30 gallons each.

I don't think there is really enough flow in the tank to effectively draw
debris
from one side of the tank to the other and into the filter inlet.
Especially with
the rockwork, I don't know if the filter is going to create any meaningful
flow
under and between the slates. I recently took apart much of the rockwork
to do a
thorough gravel vacuuming and found several pockets of junk. It was a lot
of work
and I wouldn't want to have to do this for every gravel vacuuming. My
thinking is
to add additional circulation or filtration, but am unsure how the fish
would like
that or how effective it might be. The tank is too close to the wall to
use a
hang-on overflow or behind the tank filter of any type.

Any comments or suggestions ?

George



  #3  
Old September 14th 05, 02:02 AM
kay-bee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry, the AC110s won't work for you (I overlooked the part about you not
having any room for a hang-on).
But a power head will most definately work.

My fish don't mind the circulation of the power head. You have lots of
options on where you can position them and place them where they're most
effective.

kay-bee

"George Pontis" wrote in message
t...

My
thinking is
to add additional circulation or filtration, but am unsure how the fish
would like
that or how effective it might be. The tank is too close to the wall to
use a
hang-on overflow or behind the tank filter of any type.

Any comments or suggestions ?

George





  #4  
Old September 14th 05, 08:52 AM
Dr.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Pontis" wrote in message
t...
I have a fairly newly setup cichlid tank, and thinking that my filtration
is
marginal.


Twice now I've bought junky filters and regretted it. Now 3 out of my 4
tanks have Eheim canisters. They're easy to clean, easy to set up, and are
pretty much silent. For that tank, the Pro II 2028, rated for 159 gallons,
would be nice. Or 2128 with a built in heater. I put a smaller Pro I on my
newest tank, with the Eheim prefilter, which sits on the bottom. I found a
nice chunk of bogwood which hides it fairly well. They're not cheap, ($159
for the small one (rated 66 gal) ... too lazy to look up the model #), but
well worth it IMO.

The local place where I buy most of my goodies has the 2028 on sale right
now for $199. I don't want it to look like I'm promoting them... I can post
the link to the place here, or email it... whichever. Filter pads are
included, but not the biological filter media or the mechanical
pasta-lookin' filter media. That stuff isn't very cheap either.

I'm not familiar with Fluval... If you get another canister, maybe stack 2
spraybars at one end of the tank and put both intakes on the other end, or
one half way, and the other on the end. I really don't think you can have
too much filtration.

Good luck with whichever way you approach it.

Gary


  #5  
Old September 15th 05, 03:59 PM
George Pontis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
ed says...

"George Pontis" wrote in message
t...
I have a fairly newly setup cichlid tank, and thinking that my filtration
is
marginal.


Twice now I've bought junky filters and regretted it. Now 3 out of my 4
tanks have Eheim canisters. They're easy to clean, easy to set up, and are
pretty much silent. For that tank, the Pro II 2028, rated for 159 gallons,
would be nice. Or 2128 with a built in heater. I put a smaller Pro I on my
newest tank, with the Eheim prefilter, which sits on the bottom. I found a
nice chunk of bogwood which hides it fairly well. They're not cheap, ($159
for the small one (rated 66 gal) ... too lazy to look up the model #), but
well worth it IMO.

The local place where I buy most of my goodies has the 2028 on sale right
now for $199. I don't want it to look like I'm promoting them... I can post
the link to the place here, or email it... whichever. Filter pads are
included, but not the biological filter media or the mechanical
pasta-lookin' filter media. That stuff isn't very cheap either.

I'm not familiar with Fluval... If you get another canister, maybe stack 2
spraybars at one end of the tank and put both intakes on the other end, or
one half way, and the other on the end. I really don't think you can have
too much filtration.


OK, it sounds like you and Kay-Bee are recommending more circulation without
worrying about it being excessive for these fish. That makes sense since a
doubling would only boost it up to 6 turns per hour. I think that I could
incorporate another canister easily enough. The Fluval 404, I bought it new for
only $99 and that included media. I have a smaller Eheim 2224 (Pro 1) that is a
beautiful piece of gear and nearly silent, but the 404 is good enough and so much
less expensive.
  #6  
Old September 15th 05, 07:00 PM
Dr.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Pontis" wrote in message
t...
OK, it sounds like you and Kay-Bee are recommending more circulation
without
worrying about it being excessive for these fish. That makes sense since a
doubling would only boost it up to 6 turns per hour. I think that I could
incorporate another canister easily enough. The Fluval 404, I bought it
new for
only $99 and that included media. I have a smaller Eheim 2224 (Pro 1) that
is a beautiful piece of gear and nearly silent, but the 404 is good
enough and so much
less expensive.


With that large of a tank, 2 spraybars at one end wouldn't cause it to be
too turbid, I wouldn't think. Not if the Fluval doesn't out-pump the 2128 I
have on my 72 gallon by much.

Sounds like a good plan going with another Fluval.

Gary




  #7  
Old May 27th 11, 12:21 AM
nelssoncraigg nelssoncraigg is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by FishkeepingBanter: May 2011
Posts: 5
Default

Twice now I've bought abominable filters and regretted it. Now 3 out of my 4 tanks accept Eheim canisters. They're simple to clean, simple to set up, and are pretty abundant silent. For that tank, the Pro II 2028, rated for 159 gallons, would be nice.
  #8  
Old September 24th 05, 12:40 AM
George B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have a 75 gallon African tank using a Fluval 404 and a dual biowheel
powered with a powerhead. There is more than enough filtration (0
nitirites). Nitrate build up is controled by partial water changes. If you
want more circulation then I agree with the powerhead. I ran one attached
to a sponge filter and the sponge gathered more debris than the Fluval.
Adding another 404 would be, in my opinion, overkill.
"George Pontis" wrote in message
t...
I have a fairly newly setup cichlid tank, and thinking that my filtration
is
marginal. The tank is 125G nominal capacity but actual water volume is
more like
100 gallons. Size is 6' long, 18" wide, and 20" high. The population
consists of
six 3.5" to 5.5" Lake Malawi cichlids, mostly peacocks, no mbuna. Also six
3.5" to
4.5" clown loaches and a 6-7" common plecostomus. There is an assortment
of plants
around the sides and back. Substrate is 3-5mm smooth quartz gravel. Large
pieces
of slate are stacked on the right and left sides two high with maybe 2"
gaps. (The
clown loaches favor the bottom story on the left.)

Filtration is a single Fluval 404 drawing from a suction tube at the right
side
and low. The return is split three ways: two Marineland Pro30 near the
middle of
the tank and the Fluval return nozzle at the left side. The nozzle gets
most of
the flow, maybe 50% of the total 340GPH. This filter is rated for 100
gallons
maximum, and at this rate the filter could turn over the tank around 3
times per
hour. I assume that the biowheels add significant extra biological
capacity.
Marineland rates them for 30 gallons each.

I don't think there is really enough flow in the tank to effectively draw
debris
from one side of the tank to the other and into the filter inlet.
Especially with
the rockwork, I don't know if the filter is going to create any meaningful
flow
under and between the slates. I recently took apart much of the rockwork
to do a
thorough gravel vacuuming and found several pockets of junk. It was a lot
of work
and I wouldn't want to have to do this for every gravel vacuuming. My
thinking is
to add additional circulation or filtration, but am unsure how the fish
would like
that or how effective it might be. The tank is too close to the wall to
use a
hang-on overflow or behind the tank filter of any type.

Any comments or suggestions ?

George



  #10  
Old March 14th 06, 08:01 AM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.cichlids
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Need filter suggestion for cichlid tank

George Pontis wrote:
In article ,
says...

I have a 75 gallon African tank using a Fluval 404 and a dual biowheel
powered with a powerhead. There is more than enough filtration (0
nitirites). Nitrate build up is controled by partial water changes. If you
want more circulation then I agree with the powerhead. I ran one attached
to a sponge filter and the sponge gathered more debris than the Fluval.
Adding another 404 would be, in my opinion, overkill.



Your setup makes a lot of sense to me, and on several occasions I have suggested
the PH-Biowheel combo to others as a very cost effective way of adding mechanical
and biological filtration. I never really gave it enough consideration for this
tank. One reason may have been that I have been able to move almost all the
technology out of the tank and under the stand. The only thing really visible is a
dip tube ("Eheim installation set 1").

That said, I finally ordered a second 404 but have not yet received or installed
it. As far as being overkill, I don't think it would be. The specs on the 404 say
340GPH pump, but in further detail admit to only 225 GPH "circulation". So for an
actual 100G water capacity, two of these could turn over the tank 4.5 times per
hour. That is right in the middle of the 3-6 turns per hour that is often
recommended. One thing is for sure, a single 404 is not enough for this
application.

George (P)


Wish I had a canister filter. I just have a Emperor 400 for my 75 ga. By
the way it is going to be cool when you get the file not found for
tank. lol. Get it? 404 error: file not found. I am such a nerd!

Erik
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Going to try getting an older woman friend of mine started in fishkeeping at her request! Daniel Morrow General 22 September 23rd 05 04:45 AM
A sad end to my holiday Gill Passman General 27 August 10th 05 03:23 AM
Rec.ponds FAQ Snooze General 0 May 17th 05 03:05 AM
I'm back - with a filter question gng General 9 July 27th 04 09:05 AM
HELP massive fish die-off Bill K General 7 July 23rd 04 01:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishKeepingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.