![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi I have a question. My tank is about 3 months old. I went through the
cycling and everything with a very small ammonia spike a large nitrite spike (10ppm). Anyways, my water consistently tests with nitrite at 0 and ammonia just barely detectable and nitrate less than 10ppm. I cannot seem to get rid of the last bit of ammonia. My tap tested negative for chloramines. The LFS recommends amquel. I asked him if it would starve my biological filter. He said no that the ammonia would still be available for the bacteria. I however am still doubtful. Do any of you know if amquel will starve my biological filter? Can anyone tell me why my Nitrosomas are not doing their job? I am wondering if it might be the pH. I believe I read nitospira like high pH but nitrosomas do not. I recently raised the temp from 78 to 85 because I have ich. I thought maybee the higher temp might also induce growth of the nitrosomas but it had no affect. Tank 55gal Filter 1 penguin 330 biowheel 1 Regent 30-60 with sponges in it Elite 802 pump/airstones for extra circulation oxygenation Water pretty hard pH 8.2 ( could this be the prob?) ammona barely detectable in "safe zone". nitrite 0 nitrate 10ppm temp 85 (I am treating for ich) salt 1/2 tsp gal malachite green/formalin 1/2 dose Population 4 clown loaches (1.25 - 1.5 inches) 2 platys 4 Zebra danios 1 female cherry barb (male died) 1 male dwarf gourami (1.25 inches) 2 juvenile pearl gouramis (1inch each) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
btw I did remove the act carbon from the penguin while treating for ich
"BigBadGourami" wrote in message news:_7XLb.16483$nt4.28348@attbi_s51... Hi I have a question. My tank is about 3 months old. I went through the cycling and everything with a very small ammonia spike a large nitrite spike (10ppm). Anyways, my water consistently tests with nitrite at 0 and ammonia just barely detectable and nitrate less than 10ppm. I cannot seem to get rid of the last bit of ammonia. My tap tested negative for chloramines. The LFS recommends amquel. I asked him if it would starve my biological filter. He said no that the ammonia would still be available for the bacteria. I however am still doubtful. Do any of you know if amquel will starve my biological filter? Can anyone tell me why my Nitrosomas are not doing their job? I am wondering if it might be the pH. I believe I read nitospira like high pH but nitrosomas do not. I recently raised the temp from 78 to 85 because I have ich. I thought maybee the higher temp might also induce growth of the nitrosomas but it had no affect. Tank 55gal Filter 1 penguin 330 biowheel 1 Regent 30-60 with sponges in it Elite 802 pump/airstones for extra circulation oxygenation Water pretty hard pH 8.2 ( could this be the prob?) ammona barely detectable in "safe zone". nitrite 0 nitrate 10ppm temp 85 (I am treating for ich) salt 1/2 tsp gal malachite green/formalin 1/2 dose Population 4 clown loaches (1.25 - 1.5 inches) 2 platys 4 Zebra danios 1 female cherry barb (male died) 1 male dwarf gourami (1.25 inches) 2 juvenile pearl gouramis (1inch each) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BigBadGourami" wrote in message news:_7XLb.16483$nt4.28348@attbi_s51... Hi I have a question. My tank is about 3 months old. I went through the cycling and everything with a very small ammonia spike a large nitrite spike (10ppm). Anyways, my water consistently tests with nitrite at 0 and ammonia Myself, I wouldn't be concerned. You have no nitrites, and the presence of nitrates indicates to me that the cycle is working. I, too have concerns despite what I've heard, that Amquel removes some of the ammonia from the cycle. I'd stop using it and watch parameters. billy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dinky" wrote in message ink.net... "BigBadGourami" wrote in message news:_7XLb.16483$nt4.28348@attbi_s51... Hi I have a question. My tank is about 3 months old. I went through the cycling and everything with a very small ammonia spike a large nitrite spike (10ppm). Anyways, my water consistently tests with nitrite at 0 and ammonia Myself, I wouldn't be concerned. You have no nitrites, and the presence of nitrates indicates to me that the cycle is working. I, too have concerns despite what I've heard, that Amquel removes some of the ammonia from the cycle. I'd stop using it and watch parameters. billy Just reread your post. No, I wouldn't use Amquel at this point, but I *would* work to slowly bring that ph down. Do it gradually, for your fish have likely adapted to it to some degree. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have tried to bring the pH down but my water is as hard as a dimond. I
tried aging it with peat and keeping peat in the filter. There was no noticable affect on the pH. I am thinking just leave it alone. The more I futz with the tank it seems the more problems I have. Better a stable high pH than a fluctating stressful low one. "Dinky" wrote in message ink.net... "Dinky" wrote in message ink.net... "BigBadGourami" wrote in message news:_7XLb.16483$nt4.28348@attbi_s51... Hi I have a question. My tank is about 3 months old. I went through the cycling and everything with a very small ammonia spike a large nitrite spike (10ppm). Anyways, my water consistently tests with nitrite at 0 and ammonia Myself, I wouldn't be concerned. You have no nitrites, and the presence of nitrates indicates to me that the cycle is working. I, too have concerns despite what I've heard, that Amquel removes some of the ammonia from the cycle. I'd stop using it and watch parameters. billy Just reread your post. No, I wouldn't use Amquel at this point, but I *would* work to slowly bring that ph down. Do it gradually, for your fish have likely adapted to it to some degree. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BigBadGourami" wrote in message news ![]() I have tried to bring the pH down but my water is as hard as a dimond. I tried aging it with peat and keeping peat in the filter. There was no noticable affect on the pH. I am thinking just leave it alone. The more I futz with the tank it seems the more problems I have. Better a stable high pH than a fluctating stressful low one. True, very true. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Will amquel starve bacteria??
From: "BigBadGourami" Date: 1/10/2004 1:52 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: pKYLb.16535$sv6.47649@attbi_s52 I have tried to bring the pH down but my water is as hard as a dimond. I tried aging it with peat and keeping peat in the filter. There was no noticable affect on the pH. I am thinking just leave it alone. The more I futz with the tank it seems the more problems I have. Better a stable high pH than a fluctating stressful low one. (snipped) Yes! It is MUCH better to have a stable pH than a bouncing one. Most fish can adapt well to a high pH. The only time you really need to mess with it is for breeding fish that reply on a certain pH for spawning. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BigBadGourami" wrote in message news:_7XLb.16483$nt4.28348@attbi_s51... Hi I have a question. My tank is about 3 months old. I went through the cycling and everything with a very small ammonia spike a large nitrite spike (10ppm). Anyways, my water consistently tests with nitrite at 0 and ammonia just barely detectable and nitrate less than 10ppm. I cannot seem to get rid of the last bit of ammonia. My tap tested negative for chloramines. The LFS recommends amquel. I asked him if it would starve my biological filter. He said no that the ammonia would still be available for the bacteria. I however am still doubtful. Do any of you know if amquel will starve my biological filter? Can anyone tell me why my Nitrosomas are not doing their job? I am wondering if it might be the pH. I believe I read nitospira like high pH but nitrosomas do not. I recently raised the temp from 78 to 85 because I have ich. I thought maybee the higher temp might also induce growth of the nitrosomas but it had no affect. Tank 55gal Filter 1 penguin 330 biowheel 1 Regent 30-60 with sponges in it Elite 802 pump/airstones for extra circulation oxygenation Water pretty hard pH 8.2 ( could this be the prob?) ammona barely detectable in "safe zone". nitrite 0 nitrate 10ppm temp 85 (I am treating for ich) salt 1/2 tsp gal malachite green/formalin 1/2 dose Population 4 clown loaches (1.25 - 1.5 inches) 2 platys 4 Zebra danios 1 female cherry barb (male died) 1 male dwarf gourami (1.25 inches) 2 juvenile pearl gouramis (1inch each) AFAIK, Amquel changes NH3 to NH4, which is still consumed by bacteria. A pH of 8.2 would have no bad effects on nitrifying bacteria (you need to get below 6.5pH to effect them). Some of your fish will labour in 8.2pH, and may or may not adapt. If there no other stressors, chances are good that they will adapt, but some might not prosper as well as they would have. From your description, is it possible that your trace NH3 is from municipal chloramine water treatment? It sounds like your tank is already cycled. NetMax |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BigBadGourami" wrote in message news:_7XLb.16483$nt4.28348@attbi_s51... Hi I have a question. My tank is about 3 months old. I went through the cycling and everything with a very small ammonia spike a large nitrite spike (10ppm). Anyways, my water consistently tests with nitrite at 0 and ammonia just barely detectable and nitrate less than 10ppm. I cannot seem to get rid of the last bit of ammonia. My tap tested negative for chloramines. The LFS recommends amquel. I asked him if it would starve my biological filter. He said no that the ammonia would still be available for the bacteria. I however am still doubtful. Do any of you know if amquel will starve my biological filter? Can anyone tell me why my Nitrosomas are not doing their job? I am wondering if it might be the pH. I believe I read nitospira like high pH but nitrosomas do not. I recently raised the temp from 78 to 85 because I have ich. I thought maybee the higher temp might also induce growth of the nitrosomas but it had no affect. Are you using a Salisylate based ammonia test? If you are using a Nessler based ammonia test, the Amquel will cause a false ammonia presence. Also, if a water supply has chloramines and you do the ammonia test relatively soon after a partial water change, the test (Nessler or Salisylate) will show ammonia presence. This doesn't apply if your water only contains chlorine. My water supply contains chloramines and I am using Amquel plus. I use the Aq. Pharm Freshwater/Sal****er ammonia test kit. I get a zero ammonia reading the next day after a partial water change. Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will Ammo lock and Aquilibrium kill the bacteria that feed on ammonia and nitrites | Martin | General | 4 | December 20th 03 08:13 PM |
How dependent are the bacteria that feed on ammonia and nitrite on oxygen | Martin | General | 1 | December 19th 03 05:06 AM |
How long will my bacteria live if I switch off the filter ? | Alan Silver | General | 8 | November 9th 03 03:30 PM |
Bacteria Source for Fishless Cycle | SG | General | 1 | July 17th 03 01:09 PM |