![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NetMax wrote:
"Gill Passman" wrote in message .. . Dick wrote: On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:29:23 -0500, "NetMax" wrote: "Gill Passman" wrote in message . uk... NetMax wrote: 'Stunted' tends to have a negative connotation, and if it's due to bad conditions, then it's deserved. It's interesting to note that stunted fish (I call them runts) are also naturally occurring. I think this is part of their evolutionary strategy of constant diversification through mutation. Non-natural runts (stunted by environment rather than genetics) can occur from a variety of reasons. The most predominant would appear to be diet (ie: feeding only a flake food), but it was explained to me that water parameter dilution also plays a major part, especially with certain species. The explanation was as follows: A growing fish will release hormones which it can then detect back from the water. If the hormones are not detectable or very low, then the body of water is large and/or there is no or little competition from similar species, so the proper action would be to expend more energy on growth (until some other constraint develops, such as genetics, food supply etc). If the hormones detected back are high, then the body of water is small (or shrinking), or there is significant competition from similar species (both indicating a reduced food supply), so a proper action might be to not expand energy on growth, and stay small (surviving on less food). If this analysis is correct (and I suspect that there is significant truth behind it), then it would go a long way to explaining why total sizes for fish are so different from an aquarium (where these hormones are in high concentration) and from nature. Loaches in particular are mostly from the Mekong river system fed from mountain ranges (refreshed from heavy rainfall and snowmelt), so their reaction (stunting) to accumulated elements in an aquarium (nitrates, hormones etc) might be much more acute than lake fish, such as African mbuna, which do approach and even exceed their natural size in nature. Hmmm....interesting I have a "stunted" Platy. He's around 1 year old and has never grown above 1cm. Platy fry from the same parents but in the "parent" tank grow rapidly to "adult" size. The "stunted" Platy has always lived in a 5gall tank (was born in it). His last contact with Platys was at around 2 months old when I netted out the fry and took them to the LFS - he remained only because he jumped out of the bag and so I decided that he may as well stay. His only fishy companions have been single bettas. Diet has always been varied - flake and frozen and the odd bits of pea that have been fed to the betta yet he has always remained small. My guess is that he is a "natural runt" but as he had never had any competition from other platys I've also wondered if this has been another reason for the lack of growth. Maybe sharing the tank with a betta might also have meant that staying small has been to his advantage in keeping out of trouble. I actually spotted some dinky platys (I'm guessing very young) at the LFS and bought him 3 small companions today - his days as a betta companion are over. If they get too big they will move on to a larger tank. It will be interesting to see if he grows at all now he is mixing with his "own kind" Gill Two things came to mind reading your post. The first was a vague recollection of a correlation between growth and competition, such that a competitive environment causes them to grow faster. The 2nd was that the longer a fish is exposed to the environmental conditions which cause them to stop or reduce their growth, the less likely it becomes that they will resume their normal growth rate or reach their normal size after the conditions have been corrected. This is only from personal observation. A Black Molly had 50 fry in a 10 gallon tank. There sizes varied widley as they grew. If the chemical explaination were the answer, I would think they all would be stunted, whereas most were normal or even larger than normal. Of course as they grew large enough they were moved to other tanks. The last ones in the breeding tank were smaller than normal. A few died, but most lived. The growth rates of different species, and in varying environments would make a great book. All I can tell you is that there seems to be a moment of diversification which varies according to several factors, and water quality (unless to an extreme) is not a big factor. For example, when a medium sized substrate spawning cichlid (ie: Jack Dempsey, Rainbows, Firemouths, Texans etc) has a batch of fry, it's remarkable how close in size the fry are and for how long. While the fry are under parental control, there is minimal size differences (there is always a few fry which follow a slightly different growth rate). If the parents are removed, the differences between the smallest and the largest suddenly seems to increase. Add a different species of fish (ie: some corys), and the differences increase again. Add a more food-competitive fish (fry from a slightly older generation), and again the difference between smallest and largest increases, to the point it looks like you have more than 2 generations of fry. Mess with the water temperature, or their diet and again you see this divergence occuring. At the other extreme, look at fish which have relatively few fry (cichlid mouthbrooders), and the fry will just be starting size divergence before they are even released from the parent. After 3-4 months, the fry will appear to have come from 2 broods instead of one. Livebearers are the same. Fry are all born at relatively the same size, but quickly diverge in size. I think the mechanisms at work in the first few months of fry growth are more related to species, genetics, temperature, competition and food supply (quantity, quality and interval), than water parameters as factors to cause runts. jmo Anyway, I am happy my Clowns have remained a good size for my tanks. I wonder how the chemical influence explains the 2 that have lived in my 10 gallon tank versus the 6 in the 75 all being similar in size? It would suggest that there is relatively little difference in water quality, due to your water change routine, but there are so many factors... dick My experience has been varying sizes from each batch of fry. If left in the Community tank it is only the strongest that survive. The stunted Platy survived, I believe, because he was not given this type of competition...in nature or even in the artificial confines of a community aquarium he would not have lived as long as he did - sadly I made a big mistake by putting in some Platy friends for him - I found him dead this morning :-( I think that nature/genetics does play a big part in the size fish grow to - but yes I also agree that a fish will not thrive if the conditions are wrong. I probably wouldn't put Clown Loaches in a small tank unless it was for QT purposes. However Dick's experience in fish keeping and stocking levels have allowed him to do this successfully - I wouldn't trust myself to be diligent enough to make it work. The 2nd was that the longer a fish is exposed to the environmental conditions which cause them to stop or reduce their growth, the less likely it becomes that they will resume their normal growth rate or reach their normal size after the conditions have been corrected. This observation made me wonder if this is where the idea that fish "will only grow to the size of the tank" comes from. Sadly, I still hear this comment as an excuse for keeping large fish in unsuitable "over-stocked" tanks as a justification for doing so - everytime I hear it I try to explain that just because they survive short-term it is not in the best interests of the fish.... Just last night I was talking with someone, arranging a new tank for their Tiger Oscar and Silver dollars. He was leaning towards a 70g Oceanic, and I was leaning more towards a 90g (or larger Perfecto for the same cost). We talked about the factors which make them grow, grow faster, not grow, grow slowly etc. The owner (who is a very diligent and conciencious hobbyist) went away from the conversation with ideas which would keep the Oscar growing slower and not get quite as big as possible, but in a responsible & humane way. Deliberate stunted is not neccesarily negative, or bad for the fish, but it's a fine line to manage, so it's far easier (imo) to provide optimal conditions and let the genetics be the constraint. Gill Sorry about your Platy Gill. I wonder what took him out so quickly? In aquariums, fish persist which would in nature, quickly become part of the food-chain, but occasionally' nature's crowd control methods sneak into our tanks, leaving us a little perplexed. I think that it will remain a mystery unless anything carries off the 3 companions that I bought for him. My guess is that he was probably weakened by the over-feed episode last weekend and just got picked on - but who knows... Gill |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi..
We use a word named "Verbutterung". I don't know how to translate. I think we would call that "stunted." Thanks. -- cu Marco |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sarah Navarro wrote:
Dick, I also am curiuos about this. I have three clown loaches in a 100 gallon tank, along with a few miscellanous other fish. They are only about 4 or 5 inches long also. I have had them about a year and a half and they just don't seem to grow any larger. I was told when I got them that they needed to be in a very large tank because they would get very big, but it's just not happening yet. Patience. A clown has a life expectancy of about 30 years, and they grow all the time, although growth slows down as they become older. What you buy in a LFS is a toddler. To OP: clowns tend to be quite shy and nocturnal at first, once they have adapted to their new home they become bolder, especially if kept in groups (5 to 6 is the minimum recommended). Clowns should always be supplied with hide-outs like PVC pipes, coconut shells, peat wood and the like. Note that clowns can recognise their keeper, when I had some they would not mind my presence but vanish if a stranger entered the room. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dr Engelbert Buxbaum" wrote in message ... Note that clowns can recognise their keeper, when I had some they would not mind my presence but vanish if a stranger entered the room. ============================ My Malawi cichlids were the same way. Whenever a stranger came into the house they'd vanish into the rockpile leaving what appeared to be an empty tank. But if you looked close you could see their beady little eyes in the darkness of the caves and crevices. They'd all be watching what was going on from their hidey-holes. -- Koi-Lo.... frugal ponding since 1995... Aquariums since 1952 My Pond & Aquarium Pages: NEW PAGE: Aquariums: http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shastada...ium-Page4.html http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shastadaisy ~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quarantining Clown Loaches | Gill Passman | General | 12 | November 30th 05 02:51 AM |
I lost 2 clown loaches | nmbr1ddy | General | 9 | August 28th 05 09:18 PM |
Our Clown Loaches might have Ich | Glengoyne | General | 18 | August 13th 05 05:22 AM |
Questions on Ich medication, clown loaches | Ross Vandegrift | General | 4 | February 24th 05 09:30 AM |
Clown Loaches flashing | BigBadGourami | General | 45 | January 14th 05 04:00 PM |