![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I currently have eight small Angels (dime to quarter size) in a 20 gal
tank. I am growing them out in this tank for a few months before I move them over to a 90 gal. The twenty has a Whisper #2 Power filter, a UGF filter with 25 lbs of gravel, and about five small Amazon Sword plants. The 90 gal is not currently set up but I have a Emporer 400 and a UGF with 100 lbs of gravel. I am hoping to move the Whisper #2, the gravel, and the plants from the 20 into the 90 in order to do a non-cycling transfer. Will this work ? I have heard that filtration is related more to fish load than tank size. However, this seems like quite a jump. I originally set up the 20 with a non-cycling transfer by running the Whisper #2 on another tank for a few months before setting up the 20. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mcahill wrote,
The 90 gal is not currently set up but I have a Emporer 400 and a UGF with 100 lbs of gravel..... Unless your using a RF (reverse flow) powerhead on the under gravel filter ((UGF)(RFUGF)) I sure would think twice on using one. With it set-up as a RF, at least the solid waste stays on top of the gravel where it can be removed by your power filter or siphon. I set-up my first two 90 gal. planted tanks with the RFUGF, went the extra on lighting and CO2. The plants went nuts, roots cloged the UGF plates within a couple of months causing hydrogen sulfide pockets within the gravel - some plants started dying while other grew great, tanks smelled like rotten eggs, that end of the house (where my wife made me sleep)smelled like rotten eggs, and we had to eat out every meal. I was going to go back to non-planted tanks, or the wife was eather going to kill me, or move me and the tanks out of the house (she had already called a couple of her friends - they didn't want me eather - I hope it was the tanks they didn't want). To make a long story short, the UGF came out of the tanks, they were replanted, a second bio-wheel power filter was installed on each tank, the tanks, plants, and fish look great and I'm sleeping back in the bedroom (even though the wife won't feed the fish anymore or help with their maintenance). Beleave me, after using UGF for over 30 years, you don't want to use them in a planted tank with RF power heads, and you don't want to use them in a non-planted tank without them being RF as DOCs build-up for to quickly. Get your tank a second twin bio-wheel filter or canister and you might not get kicked out of your house! I am hoping to move the Whisper #2, the gravel, and the plants from the 20 into the 90 in order to do a non-cycling transfer. Will this work ? It's not the tank or amount of water that's being cycled, it's the filter. If you move the same bio-load along with it's filter, you shouldn't get but mabe a small mini spike, due to the lack of the bio-film on the new tanks glass, rocks, gravel, etc. I currently have eight small Angels (dime to quarter size) in a 20 gal tank. I am growing them out in this tank for a few months before I move them over to a 90 gal.... A few months! The quarter size ones should be moved within a few weeks if they are in a 20 gal. long tank. And mabe another month if they are in a 20 gal. high. ................... Frank |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 May 2006 17:05:50 -0700, "Frank" wrote:
mcahill wrote, The 90 gal is not currently set up but I have a Emporer 400 and a UGF with 100 lbs of gravel..... Unless your using a RF (reverse flow) powerhead on the under gravel filter ((UGF)(RFUGF)) I sure would think twice on using one. With it set-up as a RF, at least the solid waste stays on top of the gravel where it can be removed by your power filter or siphon. I set-up my first two 90 gal. planted tanks with the RFUGF, went the extra on lighting and CO2. The plants went nuts, roots cloged the UGF plates within a couple of months causing hydrogen sulfide pockets within the gravel - some plants started dying while other grew great, tanks smelled like rotten eggs, that end of the house (where my wife made me sleep)smelled like rotten eggs, and we had to eat out every meal. I was going to go back to non-planted tanks, or the wife was eather going to kill me, or move me and the tanks out of the house (she had already called a couple of her friends - they didn't want me eather - I hope it was the tanks they didn't want). To make a long story short, the UGF came out of the tanks, they were replanted, a second bio-wheel power filter was installed on each tank, the tanks, plants, and fish look great and I'm sleeping back in the bedroom (even though the wife won't feed the fish anymore or help with their maintenance). Beleave me, after using UGF for over 30 years, you don't want to use them in a planted tank with RF power heads, and you don't want to use them in a non-planted tank without them being RF as DOCs build-up for to quickly. Get your tank a second twin bio-wheel filter or canister and you might not get kicked out of your house! I am hoping to move the Whisper #2, the gravel, and the plants from the 20 into the 90 in order to do a non-cycling transfer. Will this work ? It's not the tank or amount of water that's being cycled, it's the filter. If you move the same bio-load along with it's filter, you shouldn't get but mabe a small mini spike, due to the lack of the bio-film on the new tanks glass, rocks, gravel, etc. I currently have eight small Angels (dime to quarter size) in a 20 gal tank. I am growing them out in this tank for a few months before I move them over to a 90 gal.... A few months! The quarter size ones should be moved within a few weeks if they are in a 20 gal. long tank. And mabe another month if they are in a 20 gal. high. ................... Frank I used to employ an undergravel together with a power filter and figured it doesn't get any better than this. Of course, the discovery of RF UG did get better and so it goes. But there has been a long standing, decades, debate over possible bad effects on fish, especially those with fancy flowing fins, like angels and fancy guppies, from undergravel filtration. As I got more into plants, I moved away from UG filtration. Another hotly debated issue on some fronts, plants and UG. But my most outstanding memory of undergravel filters was the necessity of lifting them up and cleaning out the goop every few months, or year, depending. That was one messy task. And I never could avoid it, sooner or later, it was going to need the whole tank overhaul. And to those who will immediately tell me about their UG filtered tanks that have required no heavy maintenance for 15 years, I say more power to you. Back to the original post - I will re-emphasis the urgency of moving those young angels into the big tank soon. Very soon. And your Whisper 2 is an older model, the only difference between it and the newer is the addition of the bio sponge. If you haven't already, Whisper sells the sponge and frame to instantly upgrade your older model for less than 3 dollars. A worthwhile purchase. -- Mister Gardener -- Pull the WEED to email me |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mister Gardener" wrote in message ... On 3 May 2006 17:05:50 -0700, "Frank" wrote: mcahill wrote, The 90 gal is not currently set up but I have a Emporer 400 and a UGF with 100 lbs of gravel..... Unless your using a RF (reverse flow) powerhead on the under gravel filter ((UGF)(RFUGF)) I sure would think twice on using one. With it set-up as a RF, at least the solid waste stays on top of the gravel where it can be removed by your power filter or siphon. I set-up my first two 90 gal. planted tanks with the RFUGF, went the extra on lighting and CO2. The plants went nuts, roots cloged the UGF plates within a couple of months causing hydrogen sulfide pockets within the gravel - some plants started dying while other grew great, tanks smelled like rotten eggs, that end of the house (where my wife made me sleep)smelled like rotten eggs, and we had to eat out every meal. I was going to go back to non-planted tanks, or the wife was eather going to kill me, or move me and the tanks out of the house (she had already called a couple of her friends - they didn't want me eather - I hope it was the tanks they didn't want). To make a long story short, the UGF came out of the tanks, they were replanted, a second bio-wheel power filter was installed on each tank, the tanks, plants, and fish look great and I'm sleeping back in the bedroom (even though the wife won't feed the fish anymore or help with their maintenance). Beleave me, after using UGF for over 30 years, you don't want to use them in a planted tank with RF power heads, and you don't want to use them in a non-planted tank without them being RF as DOCs build-up for to quickly. Get your tank a second twin bio-wheel filter or canister and you might not get kicked out of your house! I am hoping to move the Whisper #2, the gravel, and the plants from the 20 into the 90 in order to do a non-cycling transfer. Will this work ? It's not the tank or amount of water that's being cycled, it's the filter. If you move the same bio-load along with it's filter, you shouldn't get but mabe a small mini spike, due to the lack of the bio-film on the new tanks glass, rocks, gravel, etc. I currently have eight small Angels (dime to quarter size) in a 20 gal tank. I am growing them out in this tank for a few months before I move them over to a 90 gal.... A few months! The quarter size ones should be moved within a few weeks if they are in a 20 gal. long tank. And mabe another month if they are in a 20 gal. high. ................... Frank I used to employ an undergravel together with a power filter and figured it doesn't get any better than this. Of course, the discovery of RF UG did get better and so it goes. But there has been a long standing, decades, debate over possible bad effects on fish, especially those with fancy flowing fins, like angels and fancy guppies, from undergravel filtration. As I got more into plants, I moved away from UG filtration. Another hotly debated issue on some fronts, plants and UG. But my most outstanding memory of undergravel filters was the necessity of lifting them up and cleaning out the goop every few months, or year, depending. That was one messy task. And I never could avoid it, sooner or later, it was going to need the whole tank overhaul. And to those who will immediately tell me about their UG filtered tanks that have required no heavy maintenance for 15 years, I say more power to you. Back to the original post - I will re-emphasis the urgency of moving those young angels into the big tank soon. Very soon. And your Whisper 2 is an older model, the only difference between it and the newer is the addition of the bio sponge. If you haven't already, Whisper sells the sponge and frame to instantly upgrade your older model for less than 3 dollars. A worthwhile purchase. -- Mister Gardener -- Pull the WEED to email me I agree with not using an UG for angels. I have recently removed it on one of my angel tanks, where they were not doing as well as others without UG filters, despite same food and water changes. Since, they have really grown and no one is sick at all. I don't know why, but as they are thriving now, it's all that matters. Most breeders use barebottom tanks for spawning and growing out angels as the gravel stores stuff hostile to young angels. My spawning pairs have a barebottom part where they always spawn in the same place and just a small amount of gravel with live plants on the other side. They look after the babies/wigglers on the bare side and always move them to the planted area as they become free swimmers. The babies use the plants as a safe place to explore and even try to hide from mum and dad, who try to keep them all together!!! Mary |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mary Burns wrote: "Mister Gardener" wrote in message ... On 3 May 2006 17:05:50 -0700, "Frank" wrote: mcahill wrote, The 90 gal is not currently set up but I have a Emporer 400 and a UGF with 100 lbs of gravel..... Unless your using a RF (reverse flow) powerhead on the under gravel filter ((UGF)(RFUGF)) I sure would think twice on using one. With it set-up as a RF, at least the solid waste stays on top of the gravel where it can be removed by your power filter or siphon. I set-up my first two 90 gal. planted tanks with the RFUGF, went the extra on lighting and CO2. The plants went nuts, roots cloged the UGF plates within a couple of months causing hydrogen sulfide pockets within the gravel - some plants started dying while other grew great, tanks smelled like rotten eggs, that end of the house (where my wife made me sleep)smelled like rotten eggs, and we had to eat out every meal. I was going to go back to non-planted tanks, or the wife was eather going to kill me, or move me and the tanks out of the house (she had already called a couple of her friends - they didn't want me eather - I hope it was the tanks they didn't want). To make a long story short, the UGF came out of the tanks, they were replanted, a second bio-wheel power filter was installed on each tank, the tanks, plants, and fish look great and I'm sleeping back in the bedroom (even though the wife won't feed the fish anymore or help with their maintenance). Beleave me, after using UGF for over 30 years, you don't want to use them in a planted tank with RF power heads, and you don't want to use them in a non-planted tank without them being RF as DOCs build-up for to quickly. Get your tank a second twin bio-wheel filter or canister and you might not get kicked out of your house! I am hoping to move the Whisper #2, the gravel, and the plants from the 20 into the 90 in order to do a non-cycling transfer. Will this work ? It's not the tank or amount of water that's being cycled, it's the filter. If you move the same bio-load along with it's filter, you shouldn't get but mabe a small mini spike, due to the lack of the bio-film on the new tanks glass, rocks, gravel, etc. I currently have eight small Angels (dime to quarter size) in a 20 gal tank. I am growing them out in this tank for a few months before I move them over to a 90 gal.... A few months! The quarter size ones should be moved within a few weeks if they are in a 20 gal. long tank. And mabe another month if they are in a 20 gal. high. ................... Frank I used to employ an undergravel together with a power filter and figured it doesn't get any better than this. Of course, the discovery of RF UG did get better and so it goes. But there has been a long standing, decades, debate over possible bad effects on fish, especially those with fancy flowing fins, like angels and fancy guppies, from undergravel filtration. As I got more into plants, I moved away from UG filtration. Another hotly debated issue on some fronts, plants and UG. But my most outstanding memory of undergravel filters was the necessity of lifting them up and cleaning out the goop every few months, or year, depending. That was one messy task. And I never could avoid it, sooner or later, it was going to need the whole tank overhaul. And to those who will immediately tell me about their UG filtered tanks that have required no heavy maintenance for 15 years, I say more power to you. Back to the original post - I will re-emphasis the urgency of moving those young angels into the big tank soon. Very soon. And your Whisper 2 is an older model, the only difference between it and the newer is the addition of the bio sponge. If you haven't already, Whisper sells the sponge and frame to instantly upgrade your older model for less than 3 dollars. A worthwhile purchase. -- Mister Gardener -- Pull the WEED to email me I agree with not using an UG for angels. I have recently removed it on one of my angel tanks, where they were not doing as well as others without UG filters, despite same food and water changes. Since, they have really grown and no one is sick at all. I don't know why, but as they are thriving now, it's all that matters. Most breeders use barebottom tanks for spawning and growing out angels as the gravel stores stuff hostile to young angels. My spawning pairs have a barebottom part where they always spawn in the same place and just a small amount of gravel with live plants on the other side. They look after the babies/wigglers on the bare side and always move them to the planted area as they become free swimmers. The babies use the plants as a safe place to explore and even try to hide from mum and dad, who try to keep them all together!!! Mary Do you still use the powerheads for airiation ? Or, do you just employ the power filters ? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mary Burns wrote,
I agree with not using an UG for angels. I have recently removed it on one of my angel tanks, where they were not doing as well as others without UG filters, despite same food and water changes. Since, they have really grown and no one is sick at all. I don't know why, but as they are thriving now....... UGF pull the uneaten foods and solid fish waste down into the gravel where it decomposes and slowly dissolves, becoming DOCs (dissolved organic compounds - organic pollution). With UGFs, unlike any other filters that are cleaned once in a while, these pollutants slowly build-up and poison the tank. Meanwhile, this build-up of DOCs create conditions that encourage disease, parasites and opportunistic bacteria that remain within the tank, where as, with other filters these conditions are in the filter and removed every once in a while. Now we know those UGFs are out dated - they infact become the source of organic pollution... RF (reverse flow) UGFs are a different story. The waters flow pushes up through the gravel, keeping the uneaten foods and solid fish waste atop the gravel for a siphon or power filter to pick-up. In an unplanted tank, a set-up like that would be hard to beat. My spawning pairs have a barebottom part where they always spawn in the same place and just a small amount of gravel with live plants on the other side...... My breeding tanks were all bare bottom with sponge or box filters - the few plants I had were potted. However, my grow-out tanks all had UGF - so did the first 3 stores we opened. The gravel size over the filter plates were be at least 3/8" - 1/2" to 3/4" worked even better, and once every couple of weeks, the under-side of the filter plates were siphoned out by running the siphon hose down the lift tubes and under the plates. A lot of work, but at least the water quality was kept good that way, and we didn't have to break down the tanks once or twice a year like Mister Gardener did. They look after the babies/wigglers on the bare side and always move them to the planted area as they become free swimmers..... I always removed the eggs - that way the breeders would spawn once a week or week and a half. My breeders were picked from the group at 2 or 3 weeks old - the largest of the spawn and fed 5 and 6 times a day. They were raised in deep tanks with good water flow, 20% daily water changes and at 5 gals. per fish. By the time they were pairing off, they were almost twice the size of their brothers and sisters, as was their spawn size..................... Frank |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mcahill wrote,
Do you still use the powerheads for airiation ? Or, do you just employ the power filters ?............. Not sure what your asking here. RF power heads are used to push the flow of water down the UGFs lift tube, so the waters flow is then up through the gravel. This alone will move the waters surface and pick up oxygen, as would power filters. With both, the surface movement would be greater, thus more oxygen would be added to the water... ................ Frank |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Frank wrote: mcahill wrote, Do you still use the powerheads for airiation ? Or, do you just employ the power filters ?............. Not sure what your asking here. RF power heads are used to push the flow of water down the UGFs lift tube, so the waters flow is then up through the gravel. This alone will move the waters surface and pick up oxygen, as would power filters. With both, the surface movement would be greater, thus more oxygen would be added to the water... ............... Frank You seem to be suggesting that UGF/RUGF is a bad idea. I already have the powerheads...I am asking how/if you suggest I use them. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Upgrading to an External Filter for my small pond.................. | RWITTY | General | 4 | March 30th 05 04:15 PM |
upgrading from 20 to 55 gal...need help | Margorie Simpson | General | 4 | February 16th 05 01:55 AM |
Upgrading my 10gal. nano to 30gal. | roadster3043 | Reefs | 19 | July 13th 04 05:52 PM |
upgrading to 4wpg, how often for trace nutrient fertilzation? | Dave M. Picklyk | Plants | 10 | May 25th 04 07:13 PM |
upgrading a swimming hole in a creek I need need info | mark delaporte | General | 5 | July 17th 03 09:20 PM |