![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a new Coralife Deep Six hydrometer that I've been using for the
past year or so. But over the weekend I sorted through my trash can full of aquarium supplies, and found my old "The Original" Seatest hydrometer that I've had for probably 20 years. The Coralife reads 1.022, and the tank has been doing fine. The Seatest reads off the scale, well above 1.027! It's pretty simple, I don't see how it could have gotten screwed up sitting in a box? And my tanks did fine 20 years ago too. I'm going to take them both to the fish store and see what they say, but which one do I believe? Cindy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cindy wrote:
I have a new Coralife Deep Six hydrometer that I've been using for the past year or so. But over the weekend I sorted through my trash can full of aquarium supplies, and found my old "The Original" Seatest hydrometer that I've had for probably 20 years. The Coralife reads 1.022, and the tank has been doing fine. The Seatest reads off the scale, well above 1.027! It's pretty simple, I don't see how it could have gotten screwed up sitting in a box? And my tanks did fine 20 years ago too. I'm going to take them both to the fish store and see what they say, but which one do I believe? Cindy To be honest. If you want to know the exact salinity, don't believe either one. Swing arm hydrometers are not known for being accurate, but they are pretty repeatable. The most important thing is that you keep the salinity stable, not that it is exactly 1.025. The best thing is to invest in a refractometer. They are much more accurate and actually easy to use also. Kim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yep, what Kim said. I used to put faith in my hydrometer and swing arms.....but when stuff went south I used a refractometer and what a big difference in what I actually had and whata those other two instruments were telling me I had. You can get a good decent temperature comnpensating refractometer for about $40 or so. I know yu can get them for that or less on Ebay, but I owu dbe leary of the ebay ones, even if they are the same, as there have been lots of folks on the web based forums complaining of ebay refract. whose glass sight plate fell out or leaked and allowed water to infiltrate inside. Just make sure if yu order one online from anay place its for SALT and not a BRIX type which is for sugar......... A few folks that bought so called refract. on ebay were sent BRIX type. MOst sold at places like Drs. Foster & Smith and Premium Aquatics n Indianapolis, IN, have a two year warranty and cost about $40. Yu cna get a fanceier model for about $20 more but the results are the same and its not rworth that price difference. Calibration is dead easy, and once set its good to go practically forever, but I do verify mine every now and then, and in over 3 years its yet to be off. On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:00:12 GMT, Cindy wrote: I have a new Coralife Deep Six hydrometer that I've been using for the past year or so. But over the weekend I sorted through my trash can full of aquarium supplies, and found my old "The Original" Seatest hydrometer that I've had for probably 20 years. The Coralife reads 1.022, and the tank has been doing fine. The Seatest reads off the scale, well above 1.027! It's pretty simple, I don't see how it could have gotten screwed up sitting in a box? And my tanks did fine 20 years ago too. I'm going to take them both to the fish store and see what they say, but which one do I believe? Cindy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Kim and Roy!
![]() Cindy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two problems
First, the Deep Sea is about the worst I have seen or we have tested. Second SeaTest's are fairly accurate based on all tests. The issue is proper care and maintenance, which few do or understand. Being that it is 20 yeas old put it back in the trash and trash that Deep Sea with it. Many like refracts, which I think work best for most but there are some issues with these also. 100 % of those in this hobby are calibrated to NaCl , Table Salt and Tabel salt _ IS NOT_Seawater. Saying that, they are no more accurate than a properly maintained SeaTest but refracts are more user friendly, much less frustrating, easier to maintain but still both read about .0015 SG or 1.5 ppt salinity to low. However, tests have shown that those that buy the "blue" China hydrometer, that is by far the most common in this hobby, really lucked out. There are NOT properly calibrated to their std. NaCl and by absolute fluke are right on for NSW. They are sold on various web sites as RHS-10ATC model number and look like the one half-way down this webpage http://www.aquatics-online.co.uk/aca..._PRODUCTS.html This is the only one that has been tested against NSW stds so far. If it is not this "blue" model and is one of "black" cheap models we do not know where it is but _assume _it reads .0015 SG or 1.5 ppt to low. Roy mentioned Foster & Smith and they have it. http://www.drsfostersmith.com/produc...pc=1&N=0&Nty=1 Roy also mentioned Premium Aquatics and they have it also. http://www.premiumaquatics.com/Merch...ode=Hydrometer -- Boomer If You See Me Running You Better Catch-Up Former US Army Bomb Technician (EOD) Member; IABTI, NATEODA, WEODF, ISEE & IPS Want to talk chemistry ? The Reef Chemistry Forum http://www.reefcentral.com/vbulletin/index.php Want to See More ! The Coral Realm http://www.coralrealm.com "Cindy" wrote in message . com... : I have a new Coralife Deep Six hydrometer that I've been using for the : past year or so. But over the weekend I sorted through my trash can : full of aquarium supplies, and found my old "The Original" Seatest : hydrometer that I've had for probably 20 years. : The Coralife reads 1.022, and the tank has been doing fine. : The Seatest reads off the scale, well above 1.027! It's pretty simple, : I don't see how it could have gotten screwed up sitting in a box? And : my tanks did fine 20 years ago too. : I'm going to take them both to the fish store and see what they say, : but which one do I believe? : : Cindy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have a model I bought from Premium Aquatics.......for $32 on sale...........even though I had a BAusch & Lombe model with a price tag of $1,500......I bought the el cheapo.....Now yopu may ask why I would want a cheap one if I had such a nice high end one. The one I have B & L model has interchanges slides for in it, so it can read coolants, sugars, and a whole host of other liquids.......It was missing the plate for salt. I bought it at a government DRMO sale years back for $10 and it had the salt plate missing, but it was unused, and like new......I eventually found a source for the plate I was missing, and it cost me $40 plus S & H. I bumped the high end up again the low end and both are dead on the money. Now thre B & L is sure a sharp looking unit, polished nickle and real rubber or neoprene handle, all fit inside a walnut wooden box that is lined in a velvety looking material etc.where the import cheapo is probbaly die cast metal and painted finish with a vynil type handle cover, that is in sponge rubber na plastic box.. but bottom line is its perfectly fine for sal****er aquaium use. On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:09:51 -0500, "Boomer" wrote: Two problems First, the Deep Sea is about the worst I have seen or we have tested. Second SeaTest's are fairly accurate based on all tests. The issue is proper care and maintenance, which few do or understand. Being that it is 20 yeas old put it back in the trash and trash that Deep Sea with it. Many like refracts, which I think work best for most but there are some issues with these also. 100 % of those in this hobby are calibrated to NaCl , Table Salt and Tabel salt _ IS NOT_Seawater. Saying that, they are no more accurate than a properly maintained SeaTest but refracts are more user friendly, much less frustrating, easier to maintain but still both read about .0015 SG or 1.5 ppt salinity to low. However, tests have shown that those that buy the "blue" China hydrometer, that is by far the most common in this hobby, really lucked out. There are NOT properly calibrated to their std. NaCl and by absolute fluke are right on for NSW. They are sold on various web sites as RHS-10ATC model number and look like the one half-way down this webpage http://www.aquatics-online.co.uk/aca..._PRODUCTS.html This is the only one that has been tested against NSW stds so far. If it is not this "blue" model and is one of "black" cheap models we do not know where it is but _assume _it reads .0015 SG or 1.5 ppt to low. Roy mentioned Foster & Smith and they have it. http://www.drsfostersmith.com/produc...pc=1&N=0&Nty=1 Roy also mentioned Premium Aquatics and they have it also. http://www.premiumaquatics.com/Merch...ode=Hydrometer |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boomer wrote:
Two problems First, the Deep Sea is about the worst I have seen or we have tested. Second SeaTest's are fairly accurate based on all tests. The issue is proper care and maintenance, which few do or understand. Being that it is 20 yeas old put it back in the trash and trash that Deep Sea with it. Many like refracts, which I think work best for most but there are some issues with these also. 100 % of those in this hobby are calibrated to NaCl , Table Salt and Tabel salt _ IS NOT_Seawater. Saying that, they are no more accurate than a properly maintained SeaTest but refracts are more user friendly, much less frustrating, easier to maintain but still both read about .0015 SG or 1.5 ppt salinity to low. However, tests have shown that those that buy the "blue" China hydrometer, that is by far the most common in this hobby, really lucked out. There are NOT properly calibrated to their std. NaCl and by absolute fluke are right on for NSW. They are sold on various web sites as RHS-10ATC model number and look like the one half-way down this webpage http://www.aquatics-online.co.uk/aca..._PRODUCTS.html This is the only one that has been tested against NSW stds so far. If it is not this "blue" model and is one of "black" cheap models we do not know where it is but _assume _it reads .0015 SG or 1.5 ppt to low. Roy mentioned Foster & Smith and they have it. http://www.drsfostersmith.com/produc...pc=1&N=0&Nty=1 Roy also mentioned Premium Aquatics and they have it also. http://www.premiumaquatics.com/Merch...ode=Hydrometer THANK YOU! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On nice thing about the old seatest hydrometers is that
you can take the swing arm out to calibrate it. Lightly sand off the arm to make it float less, or lightly sand off the center piece to make it sink less. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Cindy wrote on 6/6/2006 11:00 AM: I have a new Coralife Deep Six hydrometer that I've been using for the past year or so. But over the weekend I sorted through my trash can full of aquarium supplies, and found my old "The Original" Seatest hydrometer that I've had for probably 20 years. The Coralife reads 1.022, and the tank has been doing fine. The Seatest reads off the scale, well above 1.027! It's pretty simple, I don't see how it could have gotten screwed up sitting in a box? And my tanks did fine 20 years ago too. I'm going to take them both to the fish store and see what they say, but which one do I believe? Cindy |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Sallee wrote:
On nice thing about the old seatest hydrometers is that you can take the swing arm out to calibrate it. Lightly sand off the arm to make it float less, or lightly sand off the center piece to make it sink less. And what do I calibrate it to? I'll do that until I can get something else. Thanks, Cindy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New to group and a dilemma | Klane | General | 34 | May 24th 05 11:52 PM |
Hydrometer Question 2-13-04 | Steven Pace | Reefs | 4 | February 17th 04 05:31 PM |
Anything specific about a(the) hydrometer | RedForeman ©® | Reefs | 8 | December 18th 03 09:39 PM |
Plant dilemma | JHudson | Plants | 4 | November 27th 03 10:06 PM |
Nano dilemma: Clam Vs. Skimmer Vs. H2O changes - Opinion? | logan | Reefs | 2 | July 19th 03 08:16 AM |