A Fishkeeping forum. FishKeepingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishKeepingBanter.com forum » rec.aquaria.freshwater » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A new tank without cycling



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old January 3rd 07, 04:31 PM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc
Tynk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 466
Default A new tank without cycling


Jim Morcombe wrote:


Keep doing the filter "swish". It is rich in bacteria.


Not according to scientists.
It's rich in muck.

  #22  
Old January 3rd 07, 06:03 PM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc
Zebulon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default A new tank without cycling


"Tynk" wrote in message
oups.com...
You cannot set such a vague "rule" when there are way too many
variables when it comes to stocking a fish...much more than it's size
in inches.

======================
Such as the fact a 1" goldfish passes a lot more waste than a 1" guppy.
--
ZB....
Frugal ponding since 1995.
rec.ponder since late 1996.
My Pond & Aquarium Pages:
http://tinyurl.com/9do58
~~~~ }((((* ~~~ }{{{{(ö ~~~~ }((((({*




  #23  
Old January 3rd 07, 06:05 PM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc
Zebulon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default A new tank without cycling


"Tynk" wrote in message
oups.com...

Jim Morcombe wrote:


Keep doing the filter "swish". It is rich in bacteria.


Not according to scientists.
It's rich in muck.

======================
What does the muck contain? I would think there were bacteria adhering to
it.
--
ZB....
Frugal ponding since 1995.
rec.ponder since late 1996.
My Pond & Aquarium Pages:
http://tinyurl.com/9do58
~~~~ }((((* ~~~ }{{{{(ö ~~~~ }((((({*




  #24  
Old January 3rd 07, 06:51 PM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc
Zebulon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default A new tank without cycling


"nut" wrote in message
...
However, now i have a few established tanks, i have the luxury of using
mature filter media in new tanks.

==================
This has almost always worked for me as well. I have several tanks set up
so I now add an extra filter to one of them, then move it to the new tank
when "matured". Works like a charm. ;-)
--
ZB....
Frugal ponding since 1995.
rec.ponder since late 1996.
My Pond & Aquarium Pages:
http://tinyurl.com/9do58
~~~~ }((((* ~~~ }{{{{(ö ~~~~ }((((({*




  #25  
Old January 3rd 07, 08:56 PM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc
amosf © Tim Fairchild
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default A new tank without cycling

nut wrote:

amosf © Tim Fairchild wrote:

Correct. The bacteria adhere to all sorts of rubbish in the filter,
not just the media itself. All those particles that are rinsed off
and cloud the water have bacteria attached.


I have to admit, until now, when i've set up a new tank i've used 50% tank
water from water changes and 50% dechlorinated tap water.

So, although it's not harmful, using mature [dirty] water has no benefit
at all? From now on i should use 100% clean water?

I've also rinsed filter sponges in new tanks before too, in the hope of
speeding up the cycle... there seems to be mixed opinions on this but it
seems the general consensus is that it doesn't hurt so one may as well do
it.

However, now i have a few established tanks, i have the luxury of using
mature filter media in new tanks.


There are very little bacteria in the water column, so you might as well use
new water. There is some bacteria in the muck, but more on the media
itself, do throw the whole sponge it. Use some of the media out of an
established filter, or use a lot gravel from another tank. The more
bacteria you start with the quicker it can breed up.

  #26  
Old January 3rd 07, 09:00 PM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc
amosf © Tim Fairchild
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default A new tank without cycling

nut wrote:

Tynk wrote:
Kind of like the old, or rather better said, not current generation
still telling folks the "one inch per gallon rule". = )~


Is the one-inch-per-gallon rule no longer valid?!

Nobody told me... when did this happen?


It uses a linear measure to calculate a volume. It can never and could never
have worked, an I can't imagine who ever came up with a silly rule like
that. A 60 inch fish goes in a 60 gallon tank? Cool.

In any case, it's a metric world these days and who the heck knows what an
inch and a gallon is anyway. Only the US uses that stuff these days


  #27  
Old January 4th 07, 01:22 AM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc
Tynk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 466
Default A new tank without cycling


amosf © Tim Fairchild wrote:
nut wrote:

Tynk wrote:
Kind of like the old, or rather better said, not current generation
still telling folks the "one inch per gallon rule". = )~


Is the one-inch-per-gallon rule no longer valid?!

Nobody told me... when did this happen?


It uses a linear measure to calculate a volume. It can never and could never
have worked, an I can't imagine who ever came up with a silly rule like
that. A 60 inch fish goes in a 60 gallon tank? Cool.

In any case, it's a metric world these days and who the heck knows what an
inch and a gallon is anyway. Only the US uses that stuff these days


You know Tim,
If the teacher and ones in charge would have switched over long ago we
would all be on the same page with that. I cannot figure out most
metric, as I am from the US.
The simple things, sure. Things we Americans use all the time. 1 & 2
liter bottles, centimeters, a yard, etc. I'm lost when it comes to much
else. = /

  #28  
Old January 4th 07, 04:59 AM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc
nut
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default A new tank without cycling

Zëbulon wrote:
"Tynk" wrote in message
oups.com...
You cannot set such a vague "rule" when there are way too many
variables when it comes to stocking a fish...much more than it's size
in inches.

======================
Such as the fact a 1" goldfish passes a lot more waste than a 1"
guppy.


The rule was for tropical fish, not coldwater.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #29  
Old January 4th 07, 05:04 AM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc
Zebulon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default A new tank without cycling


"nut" wrote in message
...
Zëbulon wrote:
"Tynk" wrote in message
oups.com...
You cannot set such a vague "rule" when there are way too many
variables when it comes to stocking a fish...much more than it's size
in inches.

======================
Such as the fact a 1" goldfish passes a lot more waste than a 1"
guppy.


The rule was for tropical fish, not coldwater.

=================
This is true but how many newbies know that? They come here all the time
asking about putting tropicals with goldfish. Some people keep them
together successfully.

Also, some tropicals have a lot more bulk per inch than others.
--
ZB....
Frugal ponding since 1995.
rec.ponder since late 1996.
My Pond & Aquarium Pages:
http://tinyurl.com/9do58
~~~~ }((((* ~~~ }{{{{(ö ~~~~ }((((({*




  #30  
Old January 4th 07, 06:49 AM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc
amosf © Tim Fairchild
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default A new tank without cycling

Tynk wrote:


amosf © Tim Fairchild wrote:
nut wrote:

Tynk wrote:
Kind of like the old, or rather better said, not current generation
still telling folks the "one inch per gallon rule". = )~

Is the one-inch-per-gallon rule no longer valid?!

Nobody told me... when did this happen?


It uses a linear measure to calculate a volume. It can never and could
never have worked, an I can't imagine who ever came up with a silly rule
like that. A 60 inch fish goes in a 60 gallon tank? Cool.

In any case, it's a metric world these days and who the heck knows what
an inch and a gallon is anyway. Only the US uses that stuff these days


You know Tim,
If the teacher and ones in charge would have switched over long ago we
would all be on the same page with that. I cannot figure out most
metric, as I am from the US.
The simple things, sure. Things we Americans use all the time. 1 & 2
liter bottles, centimeters, a yard, etc. I'm lost when it comes to much
else. = /


It's a pity... But oh well. I notice it the most on aquarium lists as it's
always about measures - so there is always converting to do


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Absolute Beginners FishNoob General 93 September 24th 05 06:05 AM
A sad end to my holiday Gill Passman General 27 August 10th 05 03:23 AM
PHYSICAL symptoms of overstocking Gfishery General 26 April 15th 05 09:38 PM
Cycling Tank CapFusion Reefs 0 January 28th 04 09:25 PM
90 gallon fw not cycling Michael General 9 September 16th 03 01:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishKeepingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.