A Fishkeeping forum. FishKeepingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishKeepingBanter.com forum » rec.aquaria.freshwater » Plants
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VHO vs. Standard Fluorescent



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 8th 06, 06:38 AM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.plants
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default VHO vs. Standard Fluorescent

Mid posted.

"IDzine01" wrote in message
oups.com...
Thanks all!
I'm thinking that 175 w metal halide (AKA The Sun) may be a bit much in
the living room of my rented apartment. ;-)


You wouldn't believe what some hydroponics experts use! ;-) I have heard
tales of them using 1000+ watter metal halides for their hydroponics works!
If you think 175 watts is the sun wait until you see some of those 1000+
watters! Man - think of the energy consumption! Only money blocks the use of
such raw power of light! 175 watts is reasonable in comparison! Good luck -
and yeah - compact fluorescent is still a good way to go.... Good luck all
and later!


I think I will look more
into Mr..Gardener's recommendation of a piece of glass and a compact
fluorescent strip light. That seems easy and effective. Bill's link
seems like a particularly good off the shelf fit too and I like the
style it comes in.

You guys really came up with many more ideas then I could have hoped
for. Thanks so much.



  #12  
Old April 8th 06, 12:14 PM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.plants
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default VHO vs. Standard Fluorescent

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 22:38:02 -0700, "Daniel Morrow"
wrote:

You wouldn't believe what some hydroponics experts use! ;-) I have heard
tales of them using 1000+ watter metal halides for their hydroponics works!
If you think 175 watts is the sun wait until you see some of those 1000+
watters! Man - think of the energy consumption! Only money blocks the use of
such raw power of light! 175 watts is reasonable in comparison! Good luck -
and yeah - compact fluorescent is still a good way to go.... Good luck all
and later!


The only hydroponics people that I know are turning a very nice profit
on their crops, and can easily afford the expensive and extensive
lighting.

-- Mister Gardener
  #13  
Old April 8th 06, 01:01 PM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.plants
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default VHO vs. Standard Fluorescent



The only hydroponics people that I know are turning a very nice profit
on their crops, and can easily afford the expensive and extensive
lighting.


Well, in Ontario we get hydroponic lettuce in the grovery store. Also
hothouse tomatoes, although they may not be hydroponic. In Newfoundland
they had a hydroponic cucumber growing operation, but it may have been a
bit of a scam.

Then again in Barrie, Ontario an illegal grow-op in a former brewery was
shut down by police. It seemed an interesting change of product for the
brewery building, and right on major highways for deliveries.

Back on topic, the local hobbyist-type hydroponics store is a great
place for aquarium plant fertilizer ingredients!
  #14  
Old January 31st 11, 06:22 PM
stevnblk stevnblk is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by FishkeepingBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Default

I think you will need to invest in another cover. I have a standard Bulbs (20 watts) for my 26G as amended. When I plant I had to go to a high Output source (55 watts), which in turn means that the new ballast treatment Load.
  #15  
Old February 2nd 11, 09:21 PM
michelstephon michelstephon is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by FishkeepingBanter: Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Default

I think you have to invest in other coverage. I have standard bulbs (20 watts) for my 26G as amended. When the plant had to go to a high performance power (55 watts), which means that the burden of processing new ballast.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VHO vs. Standard Fluorescent IDzine01 Plants 1 April 5th 06 12:50 AM
Ballast - How does it relate to plants? Aaron Plants 4 April 19th 05 04:52 AM
Compact vs Regular Fluorescent [email protected] Plants 7 February 5th 04 04:52 AM
400W 10,000K Ushio or Aqualine AB on Standard PFO MH Ballast SpongeBob Reefs 1 December 7th 03 07:19 PM
Can I replace four 36 W compact fluorescent light tubes with 24 W? Ketoses Plants 0 July 27th 03 11:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishKeepingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.