![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BV,
You need to read some of the URLs, the ones based on real research, that are always posted here and other places by the salt advocates and you will find that those results are based on Aquaculture models, not backyard ponds. Now, you may ask, "what's the difference?" Rod Farlee used one consistently, for dosing the water with the right amount of salt to obtain a desired PPM of salt. If you read the entire URL you will see that the reason the material was presented by the originators is to give fish farmers the proper proportions of salt in water when hauling their fish to market, whether it be a food fish or feeders for the aquarium hobby. Besides the salt it also relates the amounts of compressed oxygen that is used to aerate these tanks. Now, the reason for the salt is to increase the slime on the fish and this occurs because the salt is an irritant to the fish. Now the reason for the oxygen is because they are carrying about 2 pounds of fish per gallon of water and this gives the crapped fish plenty of oxygen to travel in their tight quarters and the salt irritates them enough to have them increase their slime coat in order to have a tighter layer of slime for the bad bugs to burrow into so the fish have a better chance of fending off the bad bugs. The reason that salt is used in recirc aquaculture facilities is because they are raising fish at a stocking level of 1/2 pound of fish or more per gallon of water. A lot higher than what you are carrying in your pond. Salt serves the same reasons as the tank model mentioned above. Some thing else that is interesting is that all the models for using salt in ponds for nitrites is for the early spring in "Catfish" ponds where they are bred and raised. And by the way, for the salt to be effective in assisting in preventing the uptake of nitrite by the gills of the fish the salt levels must be 110% of the nitrite levels. If salt is not added appropriately as the nitrite levels increase the salt becomes useless. So just keeping a particular level of salt in your pond, especially if it is really low like ..01ppm as touted by some, this level would quickly be overcome by a quick rise of nitrites to even .05ppm and the salt would not do any good. For the salt/nitrite situation to work you have to monitor your water at least ever hour if not every half hour to make sure there is enough salt to be effective. Of course, I have posted this information over and over again. By the by, last year I also mentioned that there is also scientific proof that salt in the water lowers the dissolved oxygen in the water in addition to the losses due to the increase in water temperature. So as summer gets hotter and hotter and our pond temperatures go up this is something to consider. HTH Tom L.L. "BenignVanilla" m wrote in message ... "Gregory Young" wrote in message . .. Thanks for the reply Tom. I haven't seen others posting to this topic, so I assume most want to keep the heck out of this discussion, and quite frankly I can certainly understand why, it's been beat to death! I stopped replying, trying to go private email instead, but my offer to do so was not accepted. After the second public posting about good diagnosticians being able to just look at a pond and figure out the problem (I let the first go), I felt I had better reply, for fear some might actually believe that was possible. Have to run.. will catch you later, Happy ponding, Greg snip From a silent one...I have kept out of the discussion mostly because the reading is better then the writing for me! ![]() about this topic. I think you both raise some good points, but for me two points are the most important. 1) I am against standardizing a medication process. I don't take a pill unless I need it, and I don't think I want to do that to my fish, so no salt just yet. 2) Unless I missed it, which is possible, neither poster can provide a scientific study that says, "here duh facts". I think this topic is somewhat ambiguous as we do not have a clear data set to work from, but I must admit, I lean towards Greg's school. There is just something 'fishy' about salting my fish. I dunno. My jury is still out. BV. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
conversation piece? | johnhuddleston | General | 4 | July 21st 04 08:05 PM |
salt concentrations | Trevor | General | 10 | June 24th 04 12:09 AM |
Salt in Tank? | David J. Braunegg | General | 3 | December 9th 03 03:50 AM |
Q: Salt | skozzy | General | 2 | November 25th 03 05:26 AM |
SALT?? | Hank Pagel | Goldfish | 7 | July 12th 03 06:04 PM |