![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy wrote:
Derek Broughton wrote: What makes you think that? It's not true. The lateral force is exactly how these new self-supporting above-ground swimming pools get their stability. However, the greatest lateral force is at the bottom of that above-ground section, so maybe it'll work. But the lateral force works in all directions at the same time, which is why the swimming pools are stable. The lateral force of water at 1 foot deep is 0.433 psi. Assuming the frame and joints are secure and can cope with the low psi then the force in one direction is canceled by the same force in the opposite direction. That's the big assumption though - the joints are the least stable part, especially when working with things like railway ties. Here I start delving into math I haven't used in 30 years... Assuming a railway tie is 8' x 8", and you want 2' above-ground (3 ties), then (I think) the lateral force on the top tie is going to be somewhere around 12 pounds. The force on the one below that is higher, but it's also braced by the weight of the tie above it. I guess 12 pounds isn't nearly enough to move a tie, except at glacial speed (and if it's a shorter tie, the force is correspondingly less), but I still think you want to be really careful about those joints. -- derek |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|