![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Harry Ohanian" wrote in message
news:vPdXa.40763$cF.14835@rwcrnsc53... I've read that you can keep the bio balls out but can I put something else in instead? I want to go with the Jaubert system. That seems the best isn't it? I've just been doing some reading on a new study, and at least from these authors, that doesn't seem to be the case. It's quite interesting and contradicts a lot of "common knowledge", re - wet/dry and biowheels vs. nitrate level, as is presented in this group. Surprised the heck out of me and is certainly info for more research. The test involved 4 systems of this setup: 284L, temperature controlled environment, 2 10,000K euro MH, 2 40W actinic, chiller, 32kg cured Fiji LR, weekly kalkwasser (except Jaubert) protein skimmer (except Jaubert), salinity = 30ppt. 1) trickle filter - wet/dry 2) tidepool biowheel 3) Berlin 4) Jaubert w/ plenum The results: 1) for 100 days nitrate/nitrogen and orthosphosphate = no difference at 114 days the nitrate increased in both Berlin and Jaubert (very, very large spike from day 114 on in Jaubert) Berlin and biowheel were lowest but Berlin had decent size spike around day 135. 2) pH, alkalinity & total inorganic carbon = no difference at 100 days, Jaubert had slightly lower pH, slightly greater alk and carbon values (says insignificant differences) 3) TOC - "The greatest difference in water quality between the four filtration systems is that the Jaubert filtered aquarium had a significantly greater concentration of total organic carbon. The trickle, BioWheel and Berlin systems had TOC values of less than 1 mg/L-C However, the TOC in the Jaubert system never dropped below 2 mg/L-C. The water change on day 101 resulted in a temporary drop in the TOC concentration, from 3.4 to 2.4 mg/L-C, but this was short lived and the TOC concentration was soon back up to 3.5 mg/L-C." Berlin and biowheel were lowest Also, "in terms of coral health, the corals in the Jaubert system did not do well and this may be linked to the increasing TOC concentration." The summary is the kicker (from wet/dry, biowheel perspective) "To be successful, over the long term, one needs a large amount of live rock, a good lighting system, and an organic carbon removal system. Having a dedicated biological filter may be an added plus but it is certainly not a detriment to the goal of setting up and maintaining a healthy mini-reef aquarium." Tests performed by Dr. Timothy A. Hovanec. That should start the wheels of discussion going! (I'm not proposing 1 system over another, just presented as info) Cheers, Dave Johnson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|