![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using the performance chart located at www.fancykoioutlet.com with a static
head of 5 foot and assuming that pipe, valves, elbows, filter head, etc. is equivalent to 100 foot of pipe, a 2 inch pipe will give about 80 gallon per minute, while the 3 inch will give about 100 gallon per minute. It the equivalent length of pipe were 50 foot the flow 3" pipe would have almost no difference, while the 2 inch pipe would yield a flow of about 95 gallons per minute. As you can see, the pipe diameter, number of fittings, length of pipe, filter components, and other factors. If your plumbing is mostly straight runs with a minimum of elbows, valves, tees, based on your schematic and my approximation of distances based on the block counts, you may be able to get the equivalent length down to about 30 foot, but with many fittings, it could go as high as 100 foot since each elbow is equivalent to about 4 foot of pipe and each valve (fully open is equivalaent to about 2 foot of pipe. -- RichToyBox http://www.geocities.com/richtoybox/index.html "Grumpy" wrote in message news:qFRWc.38848$9d6.21590@attbi_s54... All I really want to know is, is it worth going to a 3 inch pipe from a 1 1/2 inch port from the filter. Andy Hill wrote: Grumpy wrote: Benign Vanilla wrote: "gng" wrote in message ... I have a Sequence 7200 and Aqua Ultima filter. The original guy who built this used 1.5 inch, but when you do the math you actually get nearly twice the water with 2" pipe. Been told the intake is the most important place to have the larger pipe. Sequence told me to use 3" if I could for even more flow. snip I would agree. Never restrict the input to your pump. BV. The 3" to the input is no problem. The bottom drain and skimmer are plumbed for 3". It's the output I have concern for. I want as much flow as possible to the falls. Will I be able to do 3" from the Ultima? Thanks The pump doesn't give a rip what your pipe diameter is, all it cares about is the static and dynamic head. Bigger pipe gives you a smaller dynamic head for a given flow rate. You *might* run into the situation where the system is overdesigned (dynamic head is so low that static head is all the pump is pushing against), but I doubt you'll run into that situation with only 3" pipe. If you want to be sure, figure out the system's dynamic head from the tables referenced in Richard's post, and check against the flow curves for your pump. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pipe size vs flow rate | Nathan A. Smith | General | 3 | August 9th 04 01:11 AM |
Can tank size limit fish size? (Or why are my friends fish so small?) | asginpg | General | 12 | December 2nd 03 10:45 PM |
What size piping a more detailed question ? | Mickey | General | 2 | August 30th 03 09:01 PM |
What pipe size are you using? | joe | General | 6 | August 28th 03 08:13 PM |