![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a
pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. So.... thats my 2 cents on the subject. YMMV. ![]() Roark --- wouldn't know a real winter if it bit him in the rumpus! Ventura, Ca. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ kathy :-) algae primer http://hometown.aol.com/ka30p/myhomepage/garden.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Distilled/RO water? | Nitesbane | General | 13 | July 4th 04 10:35 PM |
stuck in the cycle | Chris Palma | General | 4 | February 20th 04 07:03 AM |
RO recycle of waste water | Mark Breithaupt | Reefs | 14 | February 5th 04 04:19 AM |
No Better RO/DI Anywhere!!! | Pat Hogan | General | 0 | November 14th 03 05:57 PM |
Bleach in a fountain? | Rob | General | 16 | July 14th 03 03:28 AM |