![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() No not really. I do have a fgood stand of calurpea and as much good live rock as I could possibly put in that tank and very little room for swimming, but then most mandarins rock hop and scoot around than swim anyhow, so its not like the mandarin is hurting for swimmning space it never uses anyhow. I find mandarins some of the neasted colored fish out there and they are dirt cheap in this reigon $10 to 15 bucks at most. Too bad they have such a strict type of diet. I also have a AC 500 / 110 hob filter on the back which funtions to provide current flow as well as provide a sort of fuge for "extra" pods as well. I have live rock rubble and chaeto in the fuge. On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:08:21 GMT, George Patterson wrote: Tristan wrote: Your gonna be surprised at how many pods a mandarinis capable of eating in short order. I have a mandarin in a 10 gal tank by itself. Yep thats not a typo either and its been in there for over a year now and doing fine. Its never been fed anything that I put into the tank like brine etc on a routine basis. That's great news for me, if I understand you correctly. Your 10 gallon tank maintains an adequate supply of copepods for one mandarin? Then my 125 gallon with ~130 pounds of live rock should be capable of supporting two. Is there anything special you're doing, other than having a bunch of live rock in there? George Patterson Forgive your enemies. But always remember who they are. ------- I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tristan wrote:
Unfortunately the majority of mandarins die within a short period of time from starvation. Not on my watch. g |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
KurtG wrote:
wrote: They could be, if they move. Definitely not then. These are calcified to the rocks. Hi Kurt, It's impossible to say for certain without a good photo but your description sounds like Spirorbis spp. Spirorbis is a sedentary polychaete that builds a tightly coiled calcium carbonate tube. They are known to occasionally 'bloom' in aquaria, presumably in response to food availability. I believe they generally disappear just as quickly (and mysteriously) as they appear. They are filter feeders and present no threat to your tank. OTOH: It's possible that their appearance could be a secondary symptom of excessive nutrients in your water (the primary being the appearance of whatever phytoplankton or bacteria they eat). You can see quite a lot of detail at about 20X magnification but an ordinary magnifying glass ought to enable you to identify them to genus. Here's a picture for comparison: http://www.biopix.dk/Photo.asp?Langu...&PhotoId=18604 Vermicularly yours, Alex |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tidepool Geek wrote:
Spirorbis is a sedentary polychaete that builds a tightly coiled calcium carbonate tube. Good guess, but no. They really look like very small barnacles. My mandarin had a great time eating them, and putting up a dust cloud in it's wake. I don't see any right now, but all my rocks are still coated with tiny white circles where they once were. --Kurt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have had 2 mandarin dragon without a happy ending.
The first one I added too soon for pods to develop. The second one also die even when there were what I think was a substancial population of pods. (Now I have pods running free at nightime on my tank. Somehow my other fish doesn't seem to eat them). That fish needs special care when it come to eating and usually finish starving themselves. They are known to be very picky eaters, wanting only live food, however, you can try pellets, put them on a container where bigger fish can't eat it first. (I read that either on Melev or Don Geddis website, he was able to feed his dragon this way) It worths a shot. Sometimes, as we learn, mistakes are made, unfortunately at others expense(fish). And everyone here have had some losses. Good Luck. Ruben "KurtG" wrote in message ... Another Newbie Question: Are copepods the tiny white barnacle looking things that coat the rocks, etc? (That's what the guy that I bought the tank from told me.) Then I'm looking at this: http://www.reed-mariculture.com/copepod/ And, they appear to be a free floating insect like creatures. Reason I ask is that my Mandarin Dragonnet isn't looking very good. (It was also beaten up by a damsil). As far as I can tell, all the white crustations on the rocks (which it was eating) are gone. --Kurt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Copepods are in a subclass of its own. They vary in shapes and forms but
most of them are not easily seen with the bare eye. There are also Amphipods and Isopods which occur in great numbers in aquariums and are, in most of the cases, beneficial. No, if it can be easily seen moving, there is a 99% chances they are not copepods. http://www.museum.vic.gov.au/crust/amphigal.html http://www.tolweb.org/Isopoda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copepod iy "KurtG" wrote in message ... Another Newbie Question: Are copepods the tiny white barnacle looking things that coat the rocks, etc? (That's what the guy that I bought the tank from told me.) Then I'm looking at this: http://www.reed-mariculture.com/copepod/ And, they appear to be a free floating insect like creatures. Reason I ask is that my Mandarin Dragonnet isn't looking very good. (It was also beaten up by a damsil). As far as I can tell, all the white crustations on the rocks (which it was eating) are gone. --Kurt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Inabón Yunes wrote:
Copepods are in a subclass of its own. They vary in shapes and forms but most of them are not easily seen with the bare eye. Wilkepedia says they run 1 to 2 mm in size. That's easily visible with the bare eye, but you *would* need a microscope to see all the little appendages and be sure it's a copepod. George Patterson Forgive your enemies. But always remember who they are. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message news:6Ynhh.2172$Jb6.1190@trnddc03... Inabón Yunes wrote: Copepods are in a subclass of its own. They vary in shapes and forms but most of them are not easily seen with the bare eye. Wilkepedia says they run 1 to 2 mm in size. That's easily visible with the bare eye, but you *would* need a microscope to see all the little appendages and be sure it's a copepod. George Patterson Forgive your enemies. But always remember who they are. Yes, you can see something 2mm long with the bare eyes but to tell what is it? well, you need more detail, even a food flake moving with the current is that big iy |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My pods arrived. Wow! They are small. --Kurt KurtG wrote: Another Newbie Question: Are copepods the tiny white barnacle looking things that coat the rocks, etc? (That's what the guy that I bought the tank from told me.) Then I'm looking at this: http://www.reed-mariculture.com/copepod/ And, they appear to be a free floating insect like creatures. Reason I ask is that my Mandarin Dragonnet isn't looking very good. (It was also beaten up by a damsil). As far as I can tell, all the white crustations on the rocks (which it was eating) are gone. --Kurt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
KurtG wrote:
My pods arrived. Wow! They are small. Yeah. Mine just arrived. You can't even tell if there's anything in there besides water. Hummmmm. Wonder if ........ George Patterson Forgive your enemies. But always remember who they are. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
copepods? | miskairal | Reefs | 18 | February 4th 06 06:09 PM |
Might be a dumb question... | surewest | Reefs | 7 | April 9th 05 01:55 AM |
copepods for mandarine goby | John B | Reefs | 6 | December 15th 03 11:08 PM |
Getting rid of copepods | Eric Schreiber | Plants | 12 | October 4th 03 03:28 AM |