A Fishkeeping forum. FishKeepingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishKeepingBanter.com forum » ponds » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Evaporation rate guesses



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 25th 03, 03:17 AM
tim chandler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evaporation rate guesses

Yes, sounds reasonable. Here in Memphis, TN with about 120 square feet pond
area, I lose about an inch a week, up to 1 1/2" per week during hot weather
and running the splashy 3 ft. ledgy waterfall, or about 70-80 gallons to 120
or so. You might try not running the waterfalls for a bit and see how much
difference, if any, that makes.

Tim

"Dennis Clark" wrote in message
...
LYNN FORRES wrote:

I thought that I'd chip in here on this. We just built a 7000 gallon

pond
with two waterfalls, one that splashes a lot (but not much leaves the

pond)
with an upper pond of 8x10 ft (more or less) and then a ledge waterfall to
a lower pond that is 13.5' x 14.5'. It appears that I'm losing about an
inch every 3-4 days which is about 172 gallons. If I have any leaks, I'll
never know because the main drain is a three inch pipe that is under the
four foot deep concrete main pond - I'll never see that space!

Does this rate seem reasonable? I'm in Colorado where the average

relative
humidity is less than 20% and I have very little cover for the water (it

is
new) and the wind is unblocked by trees.

What is the consensus for my losses?

thanks,
DLC

: I'm in New Braunfels, with a 700 gal pond - adding about 30 gallons a

day.
: Hope that is helpful.


: "graham" wrote in message
: . ..
: I have a 1400 gallon pond with about 140sf of surface area and a 5 foot
: water fall. With the heat and humidity we have had the past two weeks I

am
: replacing about 60 gallons a day with the fall running.
:
:
:
: "bob carwell" wrote in message
: m...
: Could somebody at least give me some very, VERY rough guesses as to

on
: average how much water I might have to replace due to evaporation for
: a pond. I have seen threads and understand it is very complex with
: all sorts of equations, variables of relative humidity, amount of
: splashing, surface area, etc., etc. but I just need to get a rough
: handle on how ambitious to get. Some anecdotal real examples would

be
: helpful. I'm currently looking at maybe a 10x15x2 ft. pond with
: perhaps a run of 75 ft. of water effects (mostly a small stream with

a
: few little waterfalls) and a recirculating tank below. I'm in

Austin,
: TX, and the water would get maybe 60 % sun during the day. I am
: clueless whether I'm looking at 10 gallons/month or 1000 or

whatever..
: Thanks.
:
:



--

================================================== ==========================
* Dennis Clark www.techtoystoday.com

*
* "Programming and Customizing the OOPic Microcontroller" Mcgraw-Hill 2003

*

================================================== ==========================


  #2  
Old October 27th 03, 06:00 PM
Dennis Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evaporation rate guesses

tim chandler wrote:

Hmm,

Well, it is comforting that I'm apparently not looking for a big leak
anywhere (no doubt there are small ones...). I'd love to be able to
turn off the falls, but I'd have to replumb something to get water back
into the pond, currently, the falls are the exit from the bio filter (ala
skippy's stock tank design.)

thanks all,
DLC

: Yes, sounds reasonable. Here in Memphis, TN with about 120 square feet pond
: area, I lose about an inch a week, up to 1 1/2" per week during hot weather
: and running the splashy 3 ft. ledgy waterfall, or about 70-80 gallons to 120
: or so. You might try not running the waterfalls for a bit and see how much
: difference, if any, that makes.

: Tim

: "Dennis Clark" wrote in message
: ...
: LYNN FORRES wrote:
:
: I thought that I'd chip in here on this. We just built a 7000 gallon
: pond
: with two waterfalls, one that splashes a lot (but not much leaves the
: pond)
: with an upper pond of 8x10 ft (more or less) and then a ledge waterfall to
: a lower pond that is 13.5' x 14.5'. It appears that I'm losing about an
: inch every 3-4 days which is about 172 gallons. If I have any leaks, I'll
: never know because the main drain is a three inch pipe that is under the
: four foot deep concrete main pond - I'll never see that space!
:
: Does this rate seem reasonable? I'm in Colorado where the average
: relative
: humidity is less than 20% and I have very little cover for the water (it
: is
: new) and the wind is unblocked by trees.
:
: What is the consensus for my losses?
:
: thanks,
: DLC
:
: : I'm in New Braunfels, with a 700 gal pond - adding about 30 gallons a
: day.
: : Hope that is helpful.
:
:
: : "graham" wrote in message
: : . ..
: : I have a 1400 gallon pond with about 140sf of surface area and a 5 foot
: : water fall. With the heat and humidity we have had the past two weeks I
: am
: : replacing about 60 gallons a day with the fall running.
: :
: :
: :
: : "bob carwell" wrote in message
: : m...
: : Could somebody at least give me some very, VERY rough guesses as to
: on
: : average how much water I might have to replace due to evaporation for
: : a pond. I have seen threads and understand it is very complex with
: : all sorts of equations, variables of relative humidity, amount of
: : splashing, surface area, etc., etc. but I just need to get a rough
: : handle on how ambitious to get. Some anecdotal real examples would
: be
: : helpful. I'm currently looking at maybe a 10x15x2 ft. pond with
: : perhaps a run of 75 ft. of water effects (mostly a small stream with
: a
: : few little waterfalls) and a recirculating tank below. I'm in
: Austin,
: : TX, and the water would get maybe 60 % sun during the day. I am
: : clueless whether I'm looking at 10 gallons/month or 1000 or
: whatever..
: : Thanks.
: :
: :
:
:
:
: --
:
: ================================================== ==========================
: * Dennis Clark www.techtoystoday.com
: *
: * "Programming and Customizing the OOPic Microcontroller" Mcgraw-Hill 2003
: *
:
: ================================================== ==========================



--
================================================== ==========================
* Dennis Clark www.techtoystoday.com *
* "Programming and Customizing the OOPic Microcontroller" Mcgraw-Hill 2003 *
================================================== ==========================
  #3  
Old August 3rd 03, 03:33 AM
tim chandler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evaporation rate guesses


In a 150 square foot pond, a mere 1" water loss is 12.5 cubic feet of water,
or almost 95 gallons. I have a small 900 gallon pond with about 120 sq. ft
of surface area and a too-splashy waterfall cascading about 3 feet over
rocks which get wetted off to the sides. In the hot summers here in Memphis
I can lose almost 2" a week if I run the falls a lot (about 150 gallons, or
over 20 gallons/day). If I don't run the falls at all, I lose less than 1"
a week. When our power was out for almost 10 days from July 22-31 after the
bad storm here, I lost only about an inch, so that's a rate of about 7-8
gallons/day. The goldfish seemed to be totally unaffected by the stagnant
water, but the algae gained a bit on me...


  #4  
Old August 4th 03, 04:59 AM
bob carwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Evaporation rate guesses

(bob carwell) wrote in message om...
Could somebody at least give me some very, VERY rough guesses as to on
average how much water I might have to replace due to evaporation for
a pond. I have seen threads and understand it is very complex with
all sorts of equations, variables of relative humidity, amount of
splashing, surface area, etc., etc. but I just need to get a rough
handle on how ambitious to get. Some anecdotal real examples would be
helpful. I'm currently looking at maybe a 10x15x2 ft. pond with
perhaps a run of 75 ft. of water effects (mostly a small stream with a
few little waterfalls) and a recirculating tank below. I'm in Austin,
TX, and the water would get maybe 60 % sun during the day. I am
clueless whether I'm looking at 10 gallons/month or 1000 or whatever..
Thanks.


Yikes !!! Thank you all for replying with very valuable
information. Exactly what I was looking for to get me in the
ballpark, and I think I will have to consider scaling back some-
perhaps foregoing the pond with covered reservoir and collection tanks
since surface area appears to be the key or maybe if I stay with a
non-organic pond, some sort of cover on it like a swimming pool cover
during the hot days, placing it all in shade, or being satisfied with
the running water effects of the stream and waterfalls. We're coming
up on a week of 100+ degrees here in Austin. Again, very valuable
data points. Thanks !
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Marineland Penguin Bio-Wheel 170 Power Filter Dave S Tech 1 June 21st 04 07:44 PM
Marineland Penguin Bio-Wheel 170 Power Filter Dave S General 1 June 21st 04 07:44 PM
Initial CO2 Bubble Rate The Kenosha Kid Plants 3 January 28th 04 07:36 PM
u.v. sterilizer lonerider General 4 January 24th 04 03:20 AM
Problem with steady bubble rate for calcium reactor AquaD3843 Reefs 1 September 7th 03 04:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishKeepingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.