![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Elaine T" wrote in message
.. . Margolis wrote: "Elaine T" wrote in message ... You know, you can take some old filter media like spent carbon, a worn out sponge or cartridge, or some biomedia from one of your established tanks and put it in your new filter for a few weeks. You will transfer enough bacteria to keep fish immediately with no cycle. Just be sure the "donor" tank is healthy. Not quite true. You can seed a filter to speed up the cycle, but it still has to cycle and will cycle. It will just do it faster since it has "seed" bacteria to get things started. The fishless cycle is still the way to go until it is COMPLETELY cycled. I beg to differ. I have a month-old carbon bag from an Aquaclear on an established tank and put it in the new filter of a new tank and added a few fish. I never saw ammonia or nitrite in that tank. The next time I was planning a tank, I put extra bio media in the filter of my largest tank for a month and transfered that to the new filter. Again, no ammonia or nitrite. This was a Tanganyikan tank and I had to stock pretty heavily right away too. What, exactly do you mean by COMPLETELY cycled? There's a craze for fishless cycling now that is IMO completely unnecessary. A properly managed tank with a generous load of bacteria on filter media from an established tank does not "cycle" or stress fish at all. The fishkeeper must simply consider how many bacteria have been added and stock accordingly, giving the bacteria time to reproduce as the tank is filled. -- __ Elaine T __ __' http://eethomp.com/fish.html '__ I guess it depends on which version of semantics you hold to. If 'cycling' means for a system's waste processing capability to be balanced against the rate of waste being produced, then yes, it is still cycling. For example, if the bacterial capability of the filter material which has been added, exceeds the waste production of the new tank, then the tank is essentially cycled, but there is a die off of bacteria (which is harmless) until the processing capability drops down to the waste production rate. If you take the more pedestrian view (which works for me :~), the tank is cycled when the waste processing capability equals or exceeds the waste production rate, so then no, it is instantly cycled in the above case. Even if that old filter material only had half the bacteria needed, in less than 24 hours, it would be up to the right numbers, so again, you are cycled. I agree with Elaine, that it's an easily managed phenomenon after you have at least one tank running. Pet shops routinely take tanks out of service (maintenance, sterilization, refits) and they are back up operating in a few hours. There is no thought to doing a fishless cycle, or cycling with fish. The environment is almost immediately re-established using aged filter media. -- www.NetMax.tk |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fishless cycle question. | johnhuddleston | General | 8 | July 14th 04 12:27 AM |
fishless cycling question.... | disco | Goldfish | 2 | July 4th 04 02:27 AM |
Fishless cycle + ammonia question | Chris Palma | General | 4 | January 24th 04 08:58 AM |
new reef set up cycle rock question | John Smith | Reefs | 2 | January 17th 04 04:22 AM |
Fishless (temporary) planted tank question | Cichlidiot | Plants | 0 | July 1st 03 09:48 PM |