A 6/2 WELCOME TO REC.PONDS :-)

"DE" wrote in message
...
NO, just EXERCISE SOME SELF CONTROL.
============
You're a real BROKEN RECORD with this already DE. Where is your self
control? Pot calling the kettles black again? Stop making me the target of
your personal issues. If you have nothing constructive to say - say
nothing!

You yourself obviously love this "problem" as you *FEED THE TROLL* with
every one of your endlessly CRITICIZING posts, boring repetitious
CRITICIZING!. How sad you need to do this to feel better about yourself -
and the TROLL loves it - so keep feeding him if you want him on AFN!

There are groups where you can vent you spleen and where your daily
repetitious *rant* as you call it, is welcome, and you may actually find
help.

CR.........

Courageous wrote:
Nothing can be done.


This is not actually true.

rec.ponds could become moderated.

It's fairly easy to arrange, and not anywhere near as cumbersome as most
people think.

Moderation software even allows you to set up accept lists. These can be
as finicky as specific ip addresses of origin, or even hardware mac addresses.

C//

You really think you know more about moderation, and the
(un)likelihood of success with it than your news admin?

You think you can retro-moderate an unmoderated group, no less one in
the rec hierarchy?

You don't even know what group to post the QUESTION to, and cross post
to NANAU of all places!

Just because moderation software is easy to obtain doesn't mean that
moderated groups are easy to set up and manage long-term ...
especially not one in the rec. hierarchy! And they are ALWAYS the
wrong answer to a troll, just giving the troll even more power than
before.


More putting it off on others instead of doing what YOU should do, eh,
Carol?


I know, let's go create a new group that everyone should have to move
to just because Carol is incapable of controlling herself! That'll
really show Jabriol, especially using auto-moderation trying to keep
out a troll! (Far easier to just filter out Carol completely, and
not even read her pond-related posts, since she keeps defending her
inability to SHUT UP.)


snicker It would be funny if it wasn't so sad that you really don't
get how easily you could get rid of him, if you -- one person, Carol,
YOU -- would just SHUT UP.


x-posts modified to more appopriate groups and with apologies to
rec.ponds, whose readers are hopefully killing cross-posts now.

http://www.swcp.com/~dmckeon/mod-faq.html

-- DE

Courageous wrote:
Nothing can be done.


This is not actually true.

rec.ponds could become moderated.

It's fairly easy to arrange, and not anywhere near as cumbersome as most
people think.

Moderation software even allows you to set up accept lists. These can be
as finicky as specific ip addresses of origin, or even hardware mac addresses.

C//


Oh, I left this one out, which is the one the "I know more than my
news admin" and "I just CAN'T CONTROL MYSELF" Carol ought to read (but
she won't; she'll just go on inviting the troll over to play and
adding more groups):

http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/mod-pitfalls.html


Geesh, you don't even know the intended purpose of nanau but you feel
free to post this "I can't deal with the troll" BS there even though
just about EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS HOW TO DEAL WITH A
TROLL -- all you have to do is SHUT UP, Carol.

-- DE

Courageous wrote:
Is it possible you can do this for rec.ponds? Perhaps we can have two pond
groups - one where those who don't mind trolls can post, and one moderated?
Is that possible?


Someone needs to look into newsgroup formation. I'm not sure, but I don't
think one can simply change a group to moderated status.

Keep in mind that moderation doesn't have to introduce difficulty to using
the group. Usually the way it works is that newcomers, who want to post,
have to have several of their posts approved by one of a group of moderators.
Once this happens, all posts are automatically approved.

C//

You're full of it, you know nothing about actual newsgroup moderation,
even less about auto-moderation.

All that is needed here is for ONE PERSON -- YOU -- to SHUT UP.

I don't think everyone in rec.ponds is willing to go through the
newsgroup creation process in the rec hierarchy, no less move to
posting to a new group, just to get rid of ONE TROLL, when the answer
is so easy: Carol, SHUT UP and that is all it takes.

SHUT UP, Carol. Talk about PONDS in rec.ponds, period, nothing else,
no response to Jabriol and he will go away, and then people MIGHT
start reading your posts again ... maybe ... if you haven't already
made everyone so nauseous by your inability to control yourself for a
second that they can't stand to read anything you write anymore.


What, are you 2 years old, that you have NO IMPULSE CONTROL?


AUK added as you're headed for some kind of award for persistent
insistent infinite cluelessness.

"DE" wrote in message
...
More putting it off on others instead of doing what YOU should do, eh,
Carol?
====================================
You still haven't produced all these messages I keep asking about - why
not? Because you lied or because you feel like an idiot now that you know
they all have forged headers and are all from Jabbers? You are nothing but
another TROLL DE, that's pretty plain to see. You love this and you will
continue on and on like the busy-body troll you are........ why don't you
add a few more NG and blame that on me as well? ;-)

You also have memory problems don't you? He claimed he's going to destroy
rec.ponds unless I give in to his blackmail and you know that will never
happen. So perhaps you can find someone else to troll like a good girl?
:-)))

CR...........

"DE" wrote in message
...
Oh, I left this one out, which is the one the "I know more than my
news admin" and "I just CAN'T CONTROL MYSELF" Carol ought to read (but
she won't; she'll just go on inviting the troll over to play and
adding more groups):
=======================
Keep feeding the troll DE. He's loving every minute of your attention and
time..... it's a shame you just CAN'T CONTROL YOURSELF isn't it? You
still haven't produced all the messages complete with headers you claim are
from me. No proof eh? I figured. You're nothing but another bored troll.

CR...........

Someone will post a rational response to your question.

All I see is wise crack responses.

That's simply not true.

C//

"DE" wrote in message
...
Courageous wrote:
Is it possible you can do this for rec.ponds? Perhaps we can have two
pond
groups - one where those who don't mind trolls can post, and one
moderated?
Is that possible?


Someone needs to look into newsgroup formation. I'm not sure, but I
don't
think one can simply change a group to moderated status.

Keep in mind that moderation doesn't have to introduce difficulty to
using
the group. Usually the way it works is that newcomers, who want to post,
have to have several of their posts approved by one of a group of
moderators.
Once this happens, all posts are automatically approved.

C//
----------------------------------------------
You're full of it, you know nothing about actual newsgroup moderation,
even less about auto-moderation.

All that is needed here is for ONE PERSON -- YOU -- to SHUT UP.

## Now you're SHRIEKING your insults at Courageous???? What the hell did he
do to you? You can't tell one poster from another and yet have the gall to
claim everyone else can!!!!

I don't think everyone in rec.ponds is willing to go through the
newsgroup creation process in the rec hierarchy, no less move to
posting to a new group, just to get rid of ONE TROLL, when the answer
is so easy: Carol, SHUT UP and that is all it takes.

## No DE - YOU SHOULD SHUT UP = You can't tell one poster from another.
Courageous and I am not the same person. No wonder you think all Jabber's
inane posts with forged headers are mine! You don't know what you're
talking about!

SHUT UP, Carol.

## WHY? Because you can't tell one poster from another, on another NG you
know nothing about no less?

Talk about PONDS in rec.ponds, period, nothing else,

## You still run your mouth after claiming everyone is smart enough to know
Jab's forgeries - and YOU don't even know them!!!! Why don't YOU just talk
about newsservers here instead of feeding this troll over and over again?

no response to Jabriol and he will go away,

## Then why do you keep responding to him? What is your motive? Where have
I responded to him? You haven't produced one post yet you accuse and rant
and rave and shriek.....

and then people MIGHT
start reading your posts again ... maybe ... if you haven't already
made everyone so nauseous by your inability to control yourself for a
second that they can't stand to read anything you write anymore.

## You would make anyone nauseous with your repetitious, redundant broken
record posts trying to keep this going so you can get your rocks off every
day.

What, are you 2 years old, that you have NO IMPULSE CONTROL?

## What, are you 2 years old, that you have NO IMPULSE CONTROL and must get
your jollies this way?

AUK added as you're headed for some kind of award for persistent
insistent infinite cluelessness.

## Keep adding NGs, that's what trolls do....... maybe you and your new
friend should get a room together. :-))

CR........

Cracklin' wrote:
UTBill wrote:

On 3 Jun 2005 12:07:25 -0700, wrote:

nahh.. try to cross post to talk.origins.

Is thaT A GOOD FROUP TO TROLL?


Yes fred.


Oh, great, now Carol will have to come along AGAIN and 'splain to us
idjits, cuz we jes' cain't figger out who it is who posts from
63.154.80.4, we'z jes' all two ST00PID to figger it owt.


I shall go prepare for my rant-at-Carol-today for tomorrow, post-haste.

-- DE

snicker It would be funny if it wasn't so sad that you really don't
get how easily you could get rid of him, if you -- one person, Carol,
YOU -- would just SHUT UP.

I am not "Carol," but /you/ might be ill, as is evidenced by your
irrational triple response to a single message. Lithium, perhaps?

C//