anybody with pH over 7.8 got floating plants?

YOu ****ed up lying bitch. My PH is 8.2 and my ****ing plants do not
float! Yet more erroneous info from a bucnh of wanna be fish****kers
inthe moderated pond group. Such crap, if your ph is 7.8 or h igher
your plants will float........shesh such a dumbass Jan Jordan is. She
needs to come up for some fresh air and get out from between Ron
Schomperts legs and off his talley wacker.......and JAN contrary to
what RON and the other males n that gorup tell you, the male dick is
not also used to check capacity of a females stomach or its juice is
not to treat heart burn and coat the stomach for ulcers...

Please remove alt.vampyres from your spamthreads. We would appreciate
being able to use our newsgroup again for ontopic discussion. Thank
you.

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:25:40 -0700, wrote:

Please remove alt.vampyres from your spamthreads. We would appreciate
being able to use our newsgroup again for ontopic discussion. Thank
you.


Please stay tuned. We are presently having difficulties with our
programing. We are doing everything possible to recity this situation
so please bear with us. In the mean time please feel free to use the
rec.aquaria.freshwater.misc or rec.ponds group as a home base.

USENET control group INC., LLC...BBB approved

I've read about the majority of plants preferring acid conditions, and
I've read that an acidic tank is easier to maintain, because it makes
Ammonia less toxic as Ammonium. Most of my experience is with a
neutral tank, due to gravitation and the fact that 500g of KH2PO4 is
$135.

Reefs and coral-based life I can't answer for, because I don't know
that all of them prefer being bound to Aragonite and Apatite versus
sand. Anemones almost certainly prefer the Calcium base. More motile
beings might prefer a substrate with decaying plant matter, like black
soil or peat moss.
_______
You've just won a trip to Los Angeles, and if you believe that, then
we hope you farm mushrooms, because we hav a much more expensiv line
of manure to sell you.
_______
As it happens, I do happen to aim at farming aquatic fungus.
At least I think that's what sponges are. That's certainly
what they look like: Morel mushrooms. Then there's a couple with the
distinctive fruiting body containing the mycelium of a mushroom.

Anybody else got that clue? Got any better evidence that sponges are
mostly aquatic fungus?

Only fungi around here is you dumbass. NO a sponge is not a ****ing
fungi, and neither are what is normally called mushrooms in the SW
reefing world..Talk about a dumbass witho no clue!

On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:14:36 -0700, Ded Objekts In Veevoh
wrote:

I've read about the majority of plants preferring acid conditions, and
I've read that an acidic tank is easier to maintain, because it makes
Ammonia less toxic as Ammonium. Most of my experience is with a
neutral tank, due to gravitation and the fact that 500g of KH2PO4 is
$135.

Reefs and coral-based life I can't answer for, because I don't know
that all of them prefer being bound to Aragonite and Apatite versus
sand. Anemones almost certainly prefer the Calcium base. More motile
beings might prefer a substrate with decaying plant matter, like black
soil or peat moss.
_______
You've just won a trip to Los Angeles, and if you believe that, then
we hope you farm mushrooms, because we hav a much more expensiv line
of manure to sell you.
_______
As it happens, I do happen to aim at farming aquatic fungus.
At least I think that's what sponges are. That's certainly
what they look like: Morel mushrooms. Then there's a couple with the
distinctive fruiting body containing the mycelium of a mushroom.

Anybody else got that clue? Got any better evidence that sponges are
mostly aquatic fungus?

Ded Objekts In Veevoh wrote:
I've read about the majority of plants preferring acid conditions, and
I've read that an acidic tank is easier to maintain, because it makes
Ammonia less toxic as Ammonium. Most of my experience is with a
neutral tank, due to gravitation and the fact that 500g of KH2PO4 is
$135.

Well in the freshwater world it depend on the fish that you are keeping
as to which tank is easier to maintain. It is true that Ammonia is less
toxic with a lower pH but is sure to be hoped that once the nitrogen
cycle is complete that ALL tanks will have zero Ammonia....and even in a
lower pH tank it is for sure that Ammonia followed by Nitrites do not
have a good impact on your fishes health....



Reefs and coral-based life I can't answer for, because I don't know
that all of them prefer being bound to Aragonite and Apatite versus
sand. Anemones almost certainly prefer the Calcium base. More motile
beings might prefer a substrate with decaying plant matter, like black
soil or peat moss.

So why are you posting to a reef group......a marine tank needs a high
pH.......under no circumstances should you be adding black water into a
reef tank or even a FOWLR or just plain Marine Tank.....Now a sof****er
South American freshwater tank might do better that way but this is a
marine/reef group......


_______
You've just won a trip to Los Angeles, and if you believe that, then
we hope you farm mushrooms, because we hav a much more expensiv line
of manure to sell you.

Yeah, you want to keep people in the dark and sell them sh*t....that way
if you are selling marine mushroom colonies you can blame your
customer's for not following your advice of keeping them at low pH.....

_______
As it happens, I do happen to aim at farming aquatic fungus.
At least I think that's what sponges are. That's certainly
what they look like: Morel mushrooms. Then there's a couple with the
distinctive fruiting body containing the mycelium of a mushroom.

Anybody else got that clue? Got any better evidence that sponges are
mostly aquatic fungus?


Well I would suggest until you do more research you stick to farming
fungus of the edible mushroom variety......

Of course, I have been a bit harsh here and if you are genuine please
come back and ask for proper advice......

Gill

Gill, stop feeding the trolls.

Wayne Sallee
Wayne's Pets


Gill Passman wrote on 7/3/2007 4:45 PM:
Ded Objekts In Veevoh wrote:
I've read about the majority of plants preferring acid conditions, and
I've read that an acidic tank is easier to maintain, because it makes
Ammonia less toxic as Ammonium. Most of my experience is with a
neutral tank, due to gravitation and the fact that 500g of KH2PO4 is
$135.

Well in the freshwater world it depend on the fish that you are keeping
as to which tank is easier to maintain. It is true that Ammonia is less
toxic with a lower pH but is sure to be hoped that once the nitrogen
cycle is complete that ALL tanks will have zero Ammonia....and even in a
lower pH tank it is for sure that Ammonia followed by Nitrites do not
have a good impact on your fishes health....



Reefs and coral-based life I can't answer for, because I don't know
that all of them prefer being bound to Aragonite and Apatite versus
sand. Anemones almost certainly prefer the Calcium base. More motile
beings might prefer a substrate with decaying plant matter, like black
soil or peat moss.

So why are you posting to a reef group......a marine tank needs a high
pH.......under no circumstances should you be adding black water into a
reef tank or even a FOWLR or just plain Marine Tank.....Now a sof****er
South American freshwater tank might do better that way but this is a
marine/reef group......


_______
You've just won a trip to Los Angeles, and if you believe that, then
we hope you farm mushrooms, because we hav a much more expensiv line
of manure to sell you.

Yeah, you want to keep people in the dark and sell them sh*t....that way
if you are selling marine mushroom colonies you can blame your
customer's for not following your advice of keeping them at low pH.....

_______
As it happens, I do happen to aim at farming aquatic fungus.
At least I think that's what sponges are. That's certainly
what they look like: Morel mushrooms. Then there's a couple with the
distinctive fruiting body containing the mycelium of a mushroom.

Anybody else got that clue? Got any better evidence that sponges are
mostly aquatic fungus?


Well I would suggest until you do more research you stick to farming
fungus of the edible mushroom variety......

Of course, I have been a bit harsh here and if you are genuine please
come back and ask for proper advice......

Gill

Gill Passman wrote:
Ded Objekts In Veevoh wrote:

I've read about the majority of plants preferring acid conditions, and
I've read that an acidic tank is easier to maintain, because it makes
Ammonia less toxic as Ammonium. Most of my experience is with a
neutral tank, due to gravitation and the fact that 500g of KH2PO4 is
$135.


Sorry Jay if I was a bit blunt last night......only just realised who
you are this morning.....

Gill

"Ded Objekts In Veevoh" wrote in message
oups.com...
I've read about the majority of plants preferring acid conditions, and
I've read that an acidic tank is easier to maintain, because it makes
Ammonia less toxic as Ammonium.


BUT AT LOWER pH NITRITE is more toxic!
So no win there.
Bacteria breed slower at lower pH's too, which makes it harder in my
opinion.




Most of my experience is with a
neutral tank, due to gravitation and the fact that 500g of KH2PO4 is
$135.

Reefs and coral-based life I can't answer for, because I don't know
that all of them prefer being bound to Aragonite and Apatite versus
sand. Anemones almost certainly prefer the Calcium base. More motile
beings might prefer a substrate with decaying plant matter, like black
soil or peat moss.
_______
You've just won a trip to Los Angeles, and if you believe that, then
we hope you farm mushrooms, because we hav a much more expensiv line
of manure to sell you.
_______
As it happens, I do happen to aim at farming aquatic fungus.
At least I think that's what sponges are. That's certainly
what they look like: Morel mushrooms. Then there's a couple with the
distinctive fruiting body containing the mycelium of a mushroom.

Anybody else got that clue? Got any better evidence that sponges are
mostly aquatic fungus?


sponges are way primitive.
sea squirts on the other hand are vertibrates and probably our most
primitive ancestor we can point at today.
Quite cool to see them at embryo and see that spine!
big things came from that, big things!
oh yea and us too!
Woooot