![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thomas Bartkus" wrote in message . ..
"Steve" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:14:46 -0500, "Pszemol" wrote: This is agains the physics of light reflection theory. Majority of light will be reflected from the water surface and hits the walls, suffit of your room. Are you saying that the beam needs to be vertically down at 90 deg to the water surface for good efficiency? I was not aware that there would be huge differences, I don't know if he's saying that or not. But it would be wrong. You can't really "beam vertically down" because you don't have a coherent beam. It's not a laser. You have an immense multiplicity of "beams" leaving the fixture at every possible angle. You might get a small increase in perpendicular "beams" striking the surface if set the reflector vertically. But it is unlikely to be by much. Well, the goal in building a good lamp fixture is to aim as much light as possible going stright from the lamp... Not at the angle. The goal is achived by making a source of light as small as posible, being close to the point source, and to place this light source in the focal point of the parabolic reflector... And this is not a problem it is not a laser. We do not care if the beam is coherent or not... We do not care even for light to be monochromatic, since the reflection ratio or the angle of the polished aluminium reflector is pretty much the same for any color... What is the problem in an ordinary lamp is the light source which is not an ideal point source but usually a quite large bright spot. In case of HQI lamp it will be this electric arc in the ceramic bulb of the size of 1/2" or so... and this is much easier to focus than the light coming from a fluorescent tube. If we could get a point source of light and place it directly in the focal point of ideal parabolic reflector we would get a nice beam of parallel rays of light coming out of the lamp fixture... Basic principle is shown on the picture below: http://www.btinternet.com/~k.trethew...ng_systems.htm |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ...
I find it humorous the way the CatoptricReflector1.jpg is drawn in such a way that it is misleading with the light rays not all coming at a 90 degree angle from the light source. The drawing is correct, Wayne! The light will reflect at the same angle you direct the light source from the flat surface... This is exactly how the parabolic reflector works IF... IF is important: the light source has to be in the focus poit of this parabole shape... Of course - reflectors you can buy at the fish stores are not perfectly parabolic, but they try to estimate the shape with multiple stright bends of the sheet metal. Here is a better picture of this process: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflection_%28physics%29 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, not really. Imagine if you were to draw that same
drawing, and you were to make a yellow circle, and then demonstrate the light coming out of it in all directions. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Pszemol wrote on 6/19/2006 4:56 PM: "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ... I find it humorous the way the CatoptricReflector1.jpg is drawn in such a way that it is misleading with the light rays not all coming at a 90 degree angle from the light source. The drawing is correct, Wayne! The light will reflect at the same angle you direct the light source from the flat surface... This is exactly how the parabolic reflector works IF... IF is important: the light source has to be in the focus poit of this parabole shape... Of course - reflectors you can buy at the fish stores are not perfectly parabolic, but they try to estimate the shape with multiple stright bends of the sheet metal. Here is a better picture of this process: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflection_%28physics%29 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That drawing implies that more of the light is reflected
than actually is. Much of it never hits the reflector. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne Sallee wrote on 6/19/2006 5:11 PM: No, not really. Imagine if you were to draw that same drawing, and you were to make a yellow circle, and then demonstrate the light coming out of it in all directions. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Pszemol wrote on 6/19/2006 4:56 PM: "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ... I find it humorous the way the CatoptricReflector1.jpg is drawn in such a way that it is misleading with the light rays not all coming at a 90 degree angle from the light source. The drawing is correct, Wayne! The light will reflect at the same angle you direct the light source from the flat surface... This is exactly how the parabolic reflector works IF... IF is important: the light source has to be in the focus poit of this parabole shape... Of course - reflectors you can buy at the fish stores are not perfectly parabolic, but they try to estimate the shape with multiple stright bends of the sheet metal. Here is a better picture of this process: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflection_%28physics%29 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Around 25% never hits the reflector.
Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne Sallee wrote on 6/19/2006 5:15 PM: That drawing implies that more of the light is reflected than actually is. Much of it never hits the reflector. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Wayne Sallee wrote on 6/19/2006 5:11 PM: No, not really. Imagine if you were to draw that same drawing, and you were to make a yellow circle, and then demonstrate the light coming out of it in all directions. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Pszemol wrote on 6/19/2006 4:56 PM: "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ... I find it humorous the way the CatoptricReflector1.jpg is drawn in such a way that it is misleading with the light rays not all coming at a 90 degree angle from the light source. The drawing is correct, Wayne! The light will reflect at the same angle you direct the light source from the flat surface... This is exactly how the parabolic reflector works IF... IF is important: the light source has to be in the focus poit of this parabole shape... Of course - reflectors you can buy at the fish stores are not perfectly parabolic, but they try to estimate the shape with multiple stright bends of the sheet metal. Here is a better picture of this process: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflection_%28physics%29 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ...
Around 25% never hits the reflector. Of course, the rays of light that not hit the reflector will not get reflected and will travel on the stright route from the source. But how can you tell it is 25% or 75% without knowing how good your reflector is ? :-) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow that's quite a stretch of the subject of the
indifference being discussed about the drawing. Wayne Sallee Wayne's Pets Pszemol wrote on 6/19/2006 5:40 PM: "Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ... Around 25% never hits the reflector. Of course, the rays of light that not hit the reflector will not get reflected and will travel on the stright route from the source. But how can you tell it is 25% or 75% without knowing how good your reflector is ? :-) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Sallee" wrote in message ...
Wow that's quite a stretch of the subject of the indifference being discussed about the drawing. Not only this - I still do not see this 90 deg you have mentioned before ;-) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Steve,
That's a cool setup you've got there. Where'd you get that spotlight fixture? Marc Steve wrote: Well it doesn't answer your particular question, but I've decided that I definitely won't be using expensive aquarium units myself in future. I used an inexpensive industrial spot type halide fitting for the little nano tank I set up last month, it's got a 150W 10K MH bulb bought separately. It sits well clear of the water and is not likely to corrode any time soon, I'd seen them used with success over dealers tanks. There is a bubbler in there, yet the salt doesn't get near it, even though it's an open setup. Excuse the temporary top up arrangements etc on shelf above, about to sort out a decent auto topup for it and tidy up. http://www.risedale.com/nonpublic/tank01.jpg Steve -- Business Page: http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com Marine Hobbyist: http://www.melevsreef.com Reef Podcast: http://www.reefcast.com Co-Author of: http://reefkeepingbasics.com/ml.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aquarium hood light fixture | eilir | General | 2 | February 2nd 05 04:12 AM |
Eclipse light fixture - replacement? | Mandy | General | 11 | January 23rd 05 01:53 AM |
OT - How many rec.pond'ers does it take to change a light bulb? | Benign Vanilla | General | 21 | June 23rd 04 08:15 PM |
scratched acrylic shield in light fixture | Dave | Reefs | 4 | November 15th 03 02:53 PM |
OT How many group posters does it take to change a light bulb? | Richard Reynolds | Reefs | 6 | September 1st 03 08:23 AM |