![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cardinal Bernardin, chairman of the American bishops’ Committee for
Pro-Life Activities, asserts that abortion is a moral wrong and that the official stand of the church is binding on all Roman Catholics. Again, Roman Catholic professor of moral theology at Notre Dame University in the United States, James T. Burtchaell, wrote in 1982: “My argument is straightforward. Abortion is homicide: the destruction of a child.” Yet, four years later, priest Richard P. McBrien, chairman of the theology department of the same university, took pains to explain that abortion is not a defined doctrine of his church. According to this view, Catholics who subscribe to abortion cannot be excommunicated, even though they may be viewed as being disloyal. On account of this ambiguity of church authority, many prominent Catholics are outspokenly pro-abortion. Included among them in the United States are some priests. Also a number of nuns, some of whom endorsed a controversial abortion newspaper advertisement for which they were threatened with expulsion from their orders. Additionally, lay Catholics now form an active pro-abortion lobby. “I am in the mainstream of Catholic lay thought,” asserted Mrs. Eleanor C. Smeal, president of NOW, the National Organization for Women, at an abortion rally in Washington, D.C., U.S.A. At the same time, according to The New York Times, she mocked the suggestion that her support for the right to abortion could lead to her excommunication from the Roman Catholic Church. The Church of Rome is finding it increasingly difficult to resolve such conflicting views within its ranks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cracklin' wrote:
Cardinal Bernardin, chairman of the American bishops’ Committee for Pro-Life Activities, asserts that abortion is a moral wrong and that the official stand of the church is binding on all Roman Catholics. Again, Roman Catholic professor of moral theology at Notre Dame University in the United States, James T. Burtchaell, wrote in 1982: “My argument is straightforward. Abortion is homicide: the destruction of a child.” Yet, four years later, priest Richard P. McBrien, chairman of the theology department of the same university, took pains to explain that abortion is not a defined doctrine of his church. According to this view, Catholics who subscribe to abortion cannot be excommunicated, even though they may be viewed as being disloyal. On account of this ambiguity of church authority, many prominent Catholics are outspokenly pro-abortion. Included among them in the United States are some priests. Also a number of nuns, some of whom endorsed a controversial abortion newspaper advertisement for which they were threatened with expulsion from their orders. Additionally, lay Catholics now form an active pro-abortion lobby. “I am in the mainstream of Catholic lay thought,” asserted Mrs. Eleanor C. Smeal, president of NOW, the National Organization for Women, at an abortion rally in Washington, D.C., U.S.A. At the same time, according to The New York Times, she mocked the suggestion that her support for the right to abortion could lead to her excommunication from the Roman Catholic Church. The Church of Rome is finding it increasingly difficult to resolve such conflicting views within its ranks. That's why you'll never see a pope speak ex-cathedra on such matters. Only things in the past like the assumption of Mary. The last time they changed the rules, when they made the Pope rather than a group infallible there was a schism. Marriage of priests will be allowed sooner or later and the next moderate to liberal (relatively speaking) pope will almost certainly approve birth control in marriage. Abortion will come along sooner or later. The RCC has survived by changing and several things you went to hell for when I was a kid are every day occurrences now. (Or once a week in the case of meat on Friday) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:59:19 GMT, "Mike Painter"
The Church of Rome is finding it increasingly difficult to resolve such conflicting views within its ranks. That's why you'll never see a pope speak ex-cathedra on such matters. Only things in the past like the assumption of Mary. Very much is an typical mikey error mode. Ex-cathedra is for matters not clearly defined in scripture. If you had attended a Catholic school, you'd know that, mikey. The last time they changed the rules, when they made the Pope rather than a group infallible there was a schism. The rules have never changed. When was the last schism? But I forget - you never were a Catholic, so you wouldn't know. Marriage of priests will be allowed sooner or later and the next moderate to liberal (relatively speaking) pope will almost certainly approve birth control in marriage. Don't hold your breath. Abortion will come along sooner or later. Never on this one. It's directly contrary to God's word. The only way to approve this one is to find another name for this failed church. The RCC has survived by changing and several things you went to hell for when I was a kid are every day occurrences now. (Or once a week in the case of meat on Friday) Required act of penance, but no dogma. duke ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI ***** |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:25:42 -0400, Paul Duca wrote:
The RCC has survived by changing and several things you went to hell for when I was a kid are every day occurrences now. (Or once a week in the case of meat on Friday) Required act of penance, but no dogma. The church will never me, since I don't aspire to the fetid and festing pile of dog vomit it calls "eternal reward"... Paul Your funeral. duke ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI ***** |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
in article , duke at
wrote on 7/27/05 6:25 PM: On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:25:42 -0400, Paul Duca wrote: The RCC has survived by changing and several things you went to hell for when I was a kid are every day occurrences now. (Or once a week in the case of meat on Friday) Required act of penance, but no dogma. The church will never me, since I don't aspire to the fetid and festing pile of dog vomit it calls "eternal reward"... Paul Your funeral. Your dumpster... Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
duke wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:59:19 GMT, "Mike Painter" The Church of Rome is finding it increasingly difficult to resolve such conflicting views within its ranks. That's why you'll never see a pope speak ex-cathedra on such matters. Only things in the past like the assumption of Mary. Very much is an typical mikey error mode. Ex-cathedra is for matters not clearly defined in scripture. If you had attended a Catholic school, you'd know that, mikey. You still have a chance to be $5,000.00 richer if you are right and have the courage of your conviction. The cowardly little man will not take the offer. The last time they changed the rules, when they made the Pope rather than a group infallible there was a schism. The rules have never changed. When was the last schism? This has been pointed ou to you any number of times. The last major one was in 1871 when the pope declared that he was infalliable instead of the magisterium. But I forget - you never were a Catholic, so you wouldn't know Marriage of priests will be allowed sooner or later and the next moderate to liberal (relatively speaking) pope will almost certainly approve birth control in marriage. Don't hold your breath. I don't have to, it is alreadly allowed in some parts of the world. Abortion will come along sooner or later. Never on this one. It's directly contrary to God's word. The only way to approve this one is to find another name for this failed church. They said the same thing about touching the host. The RCC has survived by changing and several things you went to hell for when I was a kid are every day occurrences now. (Or once a week in the case of meat on Friday) Required act of penance, but no dogma. Meat on Friday and touching the host were mortal sins. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:39:39 GMT, "Mike Painter"
wrote: You still have a chance to be $5,000.00 richer if you are right and have the courage of your conviction. The cowardly little man will not take the offer. You had your chance. Too bad you were too paranoid about following thru. The last time they changed the rules, when they made the Pope rather than a group infallible there was a schism. The rules have never changed. When was the last schism? This has been pointed ou to you any number of times. The last major one was in 1871 when the pope declared that he was infalliable instead of the magisterium. Schism? Marriage of priests will be allowed sooner or later and the next moderate to liberal (relatively speaking) pope will almost certainly approve birth control in marriage. Don't hold your breath. I don't have to, it is alreadly allowed in some parts of the world. Nope. Abortion will come along sooner or later. Never on this one. It's directly contrary to God's word. The only way to approve this one is to find another name for this failed church. They said the same thing about touching the host. Not dogma. The RCC has survived by changing and several things you went to hell for when I was a kid are every day occurrences now. (Or once a week in the case of meat on Friday) Required act of penance, but no dogma. Meat on Friday and touching the host were mortal sins. Neither dogma. duke ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI ***** |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
duke wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:39:39 GMT, "Mike Painter" wrote: You still have a chance to be $5,000.00 richer if you are right and have the courage of your conviction. The cowardly little man will not take the offer. You had your chance. Too bad you were too paranoid about following thru. You can't even keep your lies straight. You made excuses but we all know the real reasons. We would know who you are and you know you are wrong. The last time they changed the rules, when they made the Pope rather than a group infallible there was a schism. The rules have never changed. When was the last schism? This has been pointed ou to you any number of times. The last major one was in 1871 when the pope declared that he was infalliable instead of the magisterium. Schism? Yes. Marriage of priests will be allowed sooner or later and the next moderate to liberal (relatively speaking) pope will almost certainly approve birth control in marriage. Don't hold your breath. I don't have to, it is alreadly allowed in some parts of the world. Nope. Specifically FATHER DAVID MEDOW (St. Mary Immaculate Church, Illinois) is a married, with children Roman Catholic priest. In general it is not un common and becoming moe common. Prior to the 12 century it was common. The Eastern Rite of the Roman Catholic Church allows it today, So the proper answer is Yep. Abortion will come along sooner or later. Never on this one. It's directly contrary to God's word. The only way to approve this one is to find another name for this failed church. They said the same thing about touching the host. Not dogma. Neither is priest not marrying or anything else they decide on. The RCC has survived by changing and several things you went to hell for when I was a kid are every day occurrences now. (Or once a week in the case of meat on Friday) Required act of penance, but no dogma. Meat on Friday and touching the host were mortal sins. Neither dogma. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Painter wrote:
duke wrote: On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:59:19 GMT, "Mike Painter" .... The last time they changed the rules, when they made the Pope rather than a group infallible there was a schism. The rules have never changed. When was the last schism? This has been pointed ou to you any number of times. The last major one was in 1871 when the pope declared that he was infalliable instead of the magisterium. The infallibility dogma was promulgated on 18 July 1870, and it led to the schism of the Old Catholics. For a detailed analysis of the shameless manner in which Vatican I was conducted, and of how the passage of the infallibility dogma was orchestrated, I would recommend the book by the Catholic priest August Bernhard Hasler: "HOW THE POPE BECAME INFALLIBLE: Pius IX and the Politics of Persuation," Doubleday (1981) [translation of "WIE DER PAPST UNFEHLBAR WURDE: Macht und Ohnmacht eines Dogmas," R. Piper & Co. Verlag (1979)]. Domenico Rosa |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lost my first red crab | [email protected] | General | 5 | June 11th 05 05:17 AM |
Lost some fish | Nick | General | 7 | April 9th 04 05:01 PM |
Any Eheim 2128 owners? / "Special Control Module" | Bubbles Jackson | General | 3 | January 31st 04 05:28 PM |
Help with Plants and Algae Control | Scott | General | 1 | November 22nd 03 04:42 PM |
ping John Rutz on mosquito control koi babies and gambusia | Phyllis and Jim Hurley | General | 4 | July 29th 03 03:52 PM |