If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#861
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Pontbriand" <TRIMsprocketATstormDOTcaTRIM> wrote in message
news > Yikes! Remind me to stay away from those pools ... its really not uncommon in large pools because its more economical. the downside is that if a leak were to develop in the pump room somebody would probably die before it was discovered. -- Nathan W. Collier http://InlineDiesel.com http://7SlotGrille.com http://UtilityOffRoad.com http://BighornRefrigeration.com |
Ads |
#862
|
|||
|
|||
You can't take a shower without chlorine. Test kits:
http://www.recreonics.com/lamotte_test_kits.htm God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Peter Pontbriand wrote: > > Yikes! Remind me to stay away from those pools ... > > /Peter |
#863
|
|||
|
|||
"jeff" > wrote in message
news:bqUDe.8337$k_.3822@trnddc07... > Is your reading comprehension level that low, or is is a simple case of > denial? POT, KETTLE, BLACK! no matter how loud you cry about it, "freon" is a trademark and NOTHING more! people call all sorts of 4x4's "jeeps" but that does not make them jeeps. or are you suggesting that a land rover or a samauri are indeed "jeeps" just because its commonly used in a generic manner? ANSWER DIRECTLY PLEASE. > First, it it says quite plainly that Freons are compounds, secondly it > continues to use the term in a generic manner. wrong. FIRST your own link says "[trade name]" which defines what freon is. from there it explains it farther. bottom line, "freon" is indeed a trademark and NOTHING MORE regardless of its common usage by those ignorant to the industry. that you would continue to argue that shows just how assinine and ignorant you really are. > Chlorine gas (Cl2) is pure chlorine and it dissolves in sunlight which is why it must be continually fed into pools. wanna see my CPO card too? :-) -- Nathan W. Collier http://InlineDiesel.com http://7SlotGrille.com http://UtilityOffRoad.com http://BighornRefrigeration.com |
#864
|
|||
|
|||
Chlorinated water I understand, but "pure chlorine gas" sounds mighty
dangerous to me. /Peter "L.W. (ßill) Hughes III" > wrote in message ... > You can't take a shower without chlorine. Test kits: > http://www.recreonics.com/lamotte_test_kits.htm > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > http://www.billhughes.com/ > > Peter Pontbriand wrote: > > > > Yikes! Remind me to stay away from those pools ... > > > > /Peter |
#865
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message = ... > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20 > .. . > > Tell us what happens when you don't stop mixing! >=20 > i know why you cling to this belief but the wind doesnt constantly = blow. I know why you cling to this belief but the atmosphere is never still. __ Steve .. |
#866
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message = ... .... > concentration. i know that the wind will blow it around a mix it up, = but=20 > its not going to carry it all the way to the ozone layer. do you have = any=20 > idea how short the life of chlorine is in sunlight? Stop it... I'm gonna hurl... *again*! Take a tablespoon of salt... put it in the sun. Tell us when it degrades. No fair letting it get wet... even though that wouldn't degrade it. In fact, you'd have a hard time making chlorine do anything but be chlorine. Go ahead and try....=20 Of course, the point is, chlorine can't get to the stratosphere without being bound up into a gaseous molecule that is extremely strong... otherwise, rain would precipitate it out. That's the entire problem... chlorinated fluorocarbons are highly insoluble in water, and stay bound up until they get to the upper atmosphere where UV light can attack them. __ Steve .. |
#867
|
|||
|
|||
"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message = ... > Stephen Cowell wrote: > >=20 > > Bill... how old is the Earth? > OK, that's should be easy enough for even you. Give me a formula > with the volume and square root in the equation. Here's one you should like... volume =3D square root. > The earth is 4.55 billion years old (plus or minus about 1%).=20 That's not what your Bible tells you! __ Steve .. |
#868
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message = ... > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20 > .. . > >Of course I am... otherwise, you'd be a damn > >fool, and you can't be a damn fool, we know > >that! Right? >=20 > heh...as if we didnt already know that. Or... you could be a damn fool! =20 > > You still don't see your grammatical error! >=20 > lol....crying about grammar is yet another sign of your pitiful = desperation! Grammer is how we communicate... if you can't=20 create a proper English sentence, then how do you expect to be able to make sense to someone? Your uncomprehending use of the double-negative precludes understanding what you're trying to say... indeed, it implies just the opposite. If you tell your helper "don't not open that valve!", and he opens it... who's at fault? >=20 > >>great! now give me an alternative to replacing an HMC in a pinch. >=20 > > No ambient specification. >=20 > that wasnt my post to you.....that was my post to jeff. my post to = YOU=20 > clearly stated -30 degrees. Spinning.... spinning. How your head does spin! =20 > >>and "in a pinch" means an alternative to "doing it right" to get you = > >>through > >>temporarily when youre "in a pinch" (such as on a roof top on a -30 = degree > >>day). >=20 > > The 'such as' condition is by no means limiting >=20 > lol you can squirm like a little weasel all day long and it wont = change a=20 > thing! i clearly listed -30 degrees and you later accused me of = trying to=20 > change criteria and slip one in. i have exposed your lies yet again, = and=20 > its fun to watch you try to squirm. :-D You forgot "TRANSLATION"... although you have discovered another goofy smiley to use. It still doesn't help you change the original=20 specifications of the challenge... which I met quite adequately. I said just bypass the head pressure control, as long as ambient wasn't low... you try to weasel in a condition where the ambient is low... but you didn't make the condition, you merely suggested it as an elaboration of being 'in a pinch'. You are a welch. > > Call me a liar, too... >=20 > liar. Here's a lie for you... someone once suggested to me that he'd change his views on ozone depletion when presented with convincing evidence of the cause-and-effect due to CFC usage... after presenting reams of high-quality evidence, the person did not change their views... indeed, he proceeded to pontificate his own version of atmospheric science garnered from a leak detector user manual. I'd call such a person a damn liar, wouldn't you? And lest we forget, the millstone around your neck: <> you: > more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and=20 > immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us = with=20 > bull**** in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance. me: You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you, an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what you get. </> You deserve what you get... remember that. __ Steve .. |
#869
|
|||
|
|||
"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message = ... > Stephen Cowell wrote: > >=20 > > But the point is... you type in gibberish! > Well at least I have common sense and not stupid, like you.=20 I'd pretty much have to say that you have stupid, too. __ Steve .. |
#870
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message = ... > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20 > .. . > > > youre still just a liar. >=20 > > What? No smileys? No 'TRANSLATION'? >=20 > no need, theres nothing funny in that statement. you are a liar. Now he's not smiling... I'm getting somewhere! Now that I've wiped that goofy grin off your face... answer this one: <> you: > more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and=20 > immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us = with=20 > bull**** in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance. me: You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you, an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what you get. </> You deserve what you get... remember that. __ Steve .. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Conditioning (A/C) Trouble | [email protected] | Chrysler | 5 | June 2nd 05 04:24 AM |
Maxi-Frig for R12/R134A ? | Henry Kolesnik | Technology | 39 | May 26th 05 06:31 AM |
Disposal of Refrigerant 12 dichlorodifluoromethane? | Wayne Pein | Technology | 4 | April 13th 05 11:26 PM |
Climatronic Diagnostic Controls | Luís Lourenço | Audi | 1 | November 12th 04 08:22 AM |