134a Refrigerant

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >=20
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
> >=20
<>
Heterosphere
Below an altitude of about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere has a =
more-or-less uniform composition (apart from water vapor) as described =
above. However, above about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere begins to =
have a composition which varies with altitude. This is essentially =
because, in the absence of mixing, the density of a gas falls off =
exponentially with increasing altitude, but at a rate which depends on =
the molecular mass. Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and =
nitrogen, fall off more quickly than lighter constituents such as =
helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. Thus there is a layer, =
called the heterosphere, in which the earth's atmosphere has varying =
composition. As the altitude increases, the atmosphere is dominated =
successively by helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. The =
precise altitude of the heterosphere and the layers it contains varies =
significantly with temperature.[2]
</>
>=20
> thanks for making my point stephen. heavier falls, lighter rises. =
:-)

Above 100km altitude... that's pretty high up there.. in fact, it's
above a major portion of the ozone layer, as evidenced by the
second link. This means that part of the ozone layer lies below the
Heterosphere, which means that the atmospheric mixing can
carry CFC up to those heights. I told you you wouldn't
want to understand... we all realize this. It's no longer=20
important what you say... just keep posting, and I'll
keep making you look like a fool.
__
Steve
..

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
...

> Above 100km altitude... that's pretty high up there

lol.....so youre suggesting that heavier only falls when its above 100km?
BUWHAHA!

you made my point for me liberal. thanks. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20
> ...
>>Funny how I'm crumbling with my foot on your
>>neck... yeah, I always crumble that way. What
>>was it Newt said? Oh yeah... "Go negative early,
>>don't give up". He's my mentor!
>=20
> put the crack pipe down. :-)
>=20
> ...too ignorant to debate logic and fact,=20

??

> to foolish to know when to shut=20
> up,=20

???

>and to stupid to think that you can actually fool anybody by declaring=20
> victory which youve done at least a dozen times. lol

Haven't I won? Haven't I posted information debunking
every assertion you've made? =20
__
Steve
..

"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message =
...
> Pity, Stevie you're so clueless, I doubt that you have any common
> sense, at all.=20

Does air cross the equator?
__
Steve
..

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...

> youre really having that much trouble understanding what ive said? =
_youre_=20
> the one singing the bandwagon song. i dont need the "support" that =
youre=20
> begging for.

You and Bill... the only question is, which one's
the brains, and which one's the brawn?
=20
> >Suva is HCFC based, so it's *much* less of
> >a problem
>=20
> uh-huh....so its "ok" to vent it? are you suggesting that once cfcs =
are=20
> totally phased out that youll be content? absolutely not....youre a =
whiny=20
> liberal and you always have to be controlling something. youll never =
be=20
> satiated and when youre crying about the hazards of the hcfcs ill be =
the=20
> first to remind you that you said it wasnt much of a problem. :-)

Look who's putting words in whose mouth... the
need to control is happening here, but I'm not
the one doing it. Go ahead, fantasize...
__
Steve
..

What was that saying about pots, kettles? Something about calling each other
black?

Never mind.

/Peter

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Funny how I'm crumbling with my foot on your
> > neck
>
> put the crack pipe down. :-)
>
> ...too ignorant to debate logic and fact, to foolish to know when to shut
> up, and to stupid to think that you can actually fool anybody by declaring
> victory which youve done at least a dozen times. lol
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
>
>

Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> the enviro-whackos make this crap up as they go along and
> _always_ (in every link they publish) leave a way out for when theyre proven
> wrong.

According to you. Please show cites proving fabrication of data. IOW,
PPOSTFU.

BTW Nate, do you shut off the blowers when you get your sniffer out
looking for leaks? According to your world view is should not matter.
The refrigents will fall right through the turbulent air.

--
jeff

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
...
> ...
> Sorry, Earle... I choose to live in Austin, because I like it here.

Thus explaining a lot.

Earle

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...

....

> great! now give me an alternative to replacing an HMC in a pinch. =
:-)

What is that, High Mobility Coupling? Like a big double-thick
steel-braided hose? We had two of those on the radiotelescope
dish (they always come in pairs in your line of business!).
Do you mean the coupling is in a pinch, or that you're in
a pinch to replace it?
__
Steve
..

"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...
> "L.W. ("=DFill") Hughes III" > wrote in message=20
> ...
> > Pity, Stevie you're so clueless, I doubt that you have any =
common
> > sense, at all.
>=20
> of course not bill. stephen is a seminar liberal parrot who is =
repeating=20
> what he has been taught to say. put him in a situation where he would =
have=20
> to think for himself and he'll choke.

I've been in those situations, and haven't
choked... keep dreaming. All the scientific
stuff coming at you is from Google... the
Liberal Search Engine. Dig it.
__
Steve
..