If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#331
|
|||
|
|||
"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message . .. "Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message ... > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message > . .. > > In that case, I win, by default. > > just goes to show how full of **** you are. seminar liberals are taught to > never _ever_ let an opposing view get the last word (yes, i know how it > works) no matter what. you feel that if you tell a lie often enough that > everyone around you will believe it. well mr. seminar liberal, nobody is > falling for your line of crap no matter how many times you puke it up. win? > lol.... by your own admission youre a loser and im not referencing a silly > internet argument, im talking about in life. :-) In that case, I win, by default. __ Steve .. I suspect the only thing you are winning is the ire of those of us who've suffered through this ****ing match for far too long. Back when you were making cogent arguments I was actually enjoying this to some degree, but for a while now the only thing you're proving is that you are too stubborn to bow out gracefully when your adversaries are reduced to incoherent foul-mouthed name calling. Not very sporting. /Peter .... expecting photographs of firearms to be posted any time now ... |
Ads |
#332
|
|||
|
|||
http://www.billhughes.com/savage69rxl.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O Peter Pontbriand wrote: ><snip> > > /Peter > > ... expecting photographs of firearms to be posted any time now ... |
#333
|
|||
|
|||
"L.W. ("ßill") Hughes III" > wrote in message
... > have you listened the Howard Dean > lately, his the best promotion the Republicans have ever had. lol for sure. i really hope he's the next democratic presidential nominee. -- Nathan W. Collier http://7SlotGrille.com http://UtilityOffRoad.com |
#334
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message = ... > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20 > . .. > > In that case, I win, by default. >=20 > you just tell yourself whatever you need to in order to convince = yourself=20 > that youve actually accomplished something to promote your agenda = (beyond=20 > exposing yourself for the true dumb ass that you are). :-) >=20 > youve tried to impress us with your education, made multiple direct = and=20 > indirect references to my ass and my penis, spun more straw men then = ive=20 > seen in some time, thrown so many herrings that you simply must be=20 > tired....but in the end its quite evident that your just one big pile = of=20 > ****....human garbage who is here only to promote his political = agenda. >=20 > .....and you failed miserably. :-) .... to promote my *science* agenda... you never did debunk NOAA, Nate... don't think we've forgotten. What about the rest of the planet? You asserted that you would change your mind if given good evidence... I gave you the best... you stonewalled. That makes you a *lying piece of *****. Chomp that. __ Steve .. |
#335
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Pontbriand" <TRIMsprocketATstormDOTcaTRIM> wrote in message = ... >=20 > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message > . .. >=20 > "Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message > ... > > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message > > . .. > > > In that case, I win, by default. > > > > just goes to show how full of **** you are. seminar liberals are = taught > to > > never _ever_ let an opposing view get the last word (yes, i know how = it > > works) no matter what. you feel that if you tell a lie often enough = that > > everyone around you will believe it. well mr. seminar liberal, = nobody is > > falling for your line of crap no matter how many times you puke it = up. > win? > > lol.... by your own admission youre a loser and im not referencing a = silly > > internet argument, im talking about in life. :-) >=20 > In that case, I win, by default. > __ > Steve > . > I suspect the only thing you are winning is the ire of those of us = who've > suffered through this ****ing match for far too long. Back when you = were > making cogent arguments I was actually enjoying this to some degree, = but for > a while now the only thing you're proving is that you are too stubborn = to > bow out gracefully when your adversaries are reduced to incoherent > foul-mouthed name calling. Not very sporting. Sporting? > ) Who said this had to be sporting? If I'm having sport, then it's sporting! Try reasoning with Nate... I'm sure you'll find him much more=20 reasonable than I am. BTW, I have a hard time believing that one post a day, apiece, is tearing you guys up. __ Steve .. |
#336
|
|||
|
|||
"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
. .. > ... to promote my *science* agenda.. youre "science" agenda was nothing more than "could be's" from self serving governmental agencies. > You asserted that > you would change your mind if given good evidence... so give me something _conclusive_ that doesnt come from a self serving governmental agency. -- Nathan W. Collier http://7SlotGrille.com http://UtilityOffRoad.com |
#337
|
|||
|
|||
"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
. .. > Sporting? > ) Who said this had to be sporting? exactly. this is about promoting your liberal agenda just as youve been taught to do. > I have a hard time > believing that one post a day, apiece, is tearing you > guys up. ****, we agree on something! :-) -- Nathan W. Collier http://7SlotGrille.com http://UtilityOffRoad.com |
#338
|
|||
|
|||
"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message . .. > Try reasoning with Nate... I'm sure you'll find him much more > reasonable than I am. That's just it - to me the preponderance of evidence is against there being a point bothering to try to reason with such an unreasonable individual. Continuing to butt your head against a rock in plain view of all of us is undermining my opinion of your own reasonableness. /Peter Refrigerant-free '02 TJ |
#339
|
|||
|
|||
Peter,
The "preponderance of evidence" is what Nathan has stated over and over and over again Chlorofluorocarbons are heavier than air, that's fact! Stevie has argued with only the rhetoric from other bleeding heart liberals sucking the tax payers moneys while feeding bogus government grants, that it miraculously floats up and crosses the equator to destroy the ozone in the southern hemisphere. Pure unadulterated bullsh*t! Every Real Scientist knows ozone changes have happen many times in history, the radiation is recorded in our lava rocks, and is caused by the sun's solar flares: http://www.google.com/search?biw=784...=Google+Search God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Peter Pontbriand wrote: > > That's just it - to me the preponderance of evidence is against there being > a point bothering to try to reason with such an unreasonable individual. > Continuing to butt your head against a rock in plain view of all of us is > undermining my opinion of your own reasonableness. > > /Peter > Refrigerant-free '02 TJ |
#340
|
|||
|
|||
So Bill, how did you make out with the gasoline experiment I suggested?
As I haven't seen any fireballs out west I am guessing you are too chicken**** to stand in the middle of a puddle of gasoline and light a match, even though the "preponderance of the evidence" is that gasoline vapors are heavier than air. BTW, while the actual effect of CFCs on ozone are still somewhat uncertain, the presence of CFCs in the stratosphere has been measured in samples taken during high altitude flights. Also, FWIW, even though freon is much lighter than water, it has been measured in the deepest parts of the ocean. This is the source of much of the uncertainty in the ozone depletion models: They assumed no natural sinks, whereas the the oceans, and the ground itself absorb and sequester CFCs, and there is some evidence for bacterial breakdown as well. -- jeff L.W.(ßill) Hughes III wrote: > Peter, > The "preponderance of evidence" is what Nathan has stated over and > over and over again Chlorofluorocarbons are heavier than air, that's > fact! Stevie has argued with only the rhetoric from other bleeding heart > liberals sucking the tax payers moneys while feeding bogus government > grants, that it miraculously floats up and crosses the equator to > destroy the ozone in the southern hemisphere. Pure unadulterated > bullsh*t! Every Real Scientist knows ozone changes have happen many > times in history, the radiation is recorded in our lava rocks, and is > caused by the sun's solar flares: > http://www.google.com/search?biw=784...=Google+Search > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > http://www.billhughes.com/ > > Peter Pontbriand wrote: > >>That's just it - to me the preponderance of evidence is against there being >>a point bothering to try to reason with such an unreasonable individual. >>Continuing to butt your head against a rock in plain view of all of us is >>undermining my opinion of your own reasonableness. >> >>/Peter >>Refrigerant-free '02 TJ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Conditioning (A/C) Trouble | [email protected] | Chrysler | 5 | June 2nd 05 04:24 AM |
Maxi-Frig for R12/R134A ? | Henry Kolesnik | Technology | 39 | May 26th 05 06:31 AM |
Disposal of Refrigerant 12 dichlorodifluoromethane? | Wayne Pein | Technology | 4 | April 13th 05 11:26 PM |
Climatronic Diagnostic Controls | Luís Lourenço | Audi | 1 | November 12th 04 08:22 AM |