If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Prestone Rather Than DesCool ?
On 8 Aug 2014 10:46:48 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
> > wrote: >>On Thursday, August 7, 2014 12:08:24 PM UTC-7, Bob wrote: >>> >>> Have a 2009 Buick LaCrosse. >>> >>> Manual says to use DexCool for antifreeze. >>> I think it also says, somewhere, "only". >>> >>> I see that the Prestone product(s) all say "for any car". >>> >>> Safe to use Prestone, instead ? >> >>Prestone says it meets GM 6277M, the specification for DexCool: >> >> http://prestone.com/enmx/learn_more/...sked_questions >> >>OTOH why bother switching when Prestone makes its own version of >>DexCool, and at most you'll save just $15 every 5 years or 150,000 >>miles? > >Long-term, using DexCool is supposed to save you money due to the extended >change interval, and the Prestone equivalent is just fine. > >However, I know several people who have changed from DexCool to conventional >antifreeze because they were getting black gooey material in their cooling >system, the source of which was never properly tracked down but which went >away when they moved to Prestone. >--scott I tried some Orange stuff, not sure if it was literally dexcool or some other name, in my 92 explorer and as soon as I started using it little orange foamy "leakage" bubbles started forming around the edges of all the hoses where they were clamped down. None of those places had ever leaked any of the green stuff but somehow that orange stuff managed to ooze it's way out. I drained it back out within a few months and went back to the green stuff and no more of that problem. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Prestone Rather Than DesCool ?
On Fri, 08 Aug 2014 11:49:42 -1000, Geoff Welsh >
wrote: >Bob wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Have a 2009 Buick LaCrosse. >> >> Manual says to use DexCool for antifreeze. >> I think it also says, somewhere, "only". >> >> I see that the Prestone product(s) all say "for any car". >> >> Safe to use Prestone, instead ? >> >> Thanks, >> Bob > > >Prestone sells DexCool spec fluid. > >If you are really wondering about mixing two-year coolant with >five-year...it just turns it all into two-year. It says that on the >bottle and in the fffing manual. > >Don't forget the true weak link is that the pressurized cap has a >one-year expected life span! > >GW > Where did you get the idea that caps have a one year life span. Most of mine came with the car and are still working just fine, some for over 20 years. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Prestone Rather Than DesCool ?
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 12:14:27 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
wrote: >On Thursday, August 7, 2014 2:37:32 PM UTC-10, Ashton Crusher wrote: >> On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:08:24 -0400, Bob > wrote: >> >> >> >> >Hello, >> >> > >> >> >Have a 2009 Buick LaCrosse. >> >> > >> >> >Manual says to use DexCool for antifreeze. >> >> >I think it also says, somewhere, "only". >> >> > >> >> >I see that the Prestone product(s) all say "for any car". >> >> > >> >> >Safe to use Prestone, instead ? >> >> > >> >> >Thanks, >> >> >Bob >> >> > >> >> >--- >> >> >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. >> >> >http://www.avast.com >> >> >> >> From what I've read, yes, it's fine to use the Prestone. The only >> >> difference is it won't last 100K miles like the dexcool supposedly >> >> does. Of course, you could use Dexcool and not worry. The price >> >> can't be much different. The big issue about dexcool, again, this is >> >> from what I read, was that people who are always opening their >> >> radiator cap to 'check the antifreeze' are letting air into the system >> >> and the air reacts with the dexcool and if enough air gets in it can >> >> cause problems. If the system is just left alone and the level >> >> checked by simply looking at the level in the overflow bottle there >> >> should not be a problem. I would NOT use Dexcool in any car that did >> >> not use it from the factory. And if you mix other non-dexcool stuff >> >> with it you lose the long life benefit. > >I had that problem with my Chevy Lumina or rather many people had that problem with their coolant on that car. The problem was supposed to be solved by slightly changing the design of the cap by adding a little spring to the vent the equalized the pressure with the atmosphere. I never could figure out how that was supposed to work. I would guess the change in cap design allowed the system to form a vacuum of a few psi instead of letting the reservoir suck in air as it cooled. The vacuum would have caused the hoses to slightly collapse when cool. That would prevent a lot of "fresh air" full of oxygen from getting in and reacting with the dexcool and degrading it. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Prestone Rather Than DesCool ?
On 8/8/2014 12:23 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:
> > I would guess the change in cap design allowed the system to form a > vacuum of a few psi instead of letting the reservoir suck in air as it > cooled. The vacuum would have caused the hoses to slightly collapse > when cool. That would prevent a lot of "fresh air" full of oxygen > from getting in and reacting with the dexcool and degrading it. > The old Lumina cap had a design that prevented a vacuum from forming in the radiator. If there's no vacuum present, water won't be sucked back into the radiator from the coolant reservoir on cool-down. What gives? OTOH, I suppose that all that doesn't matter much these days. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Prestone Rather Than DesCool ?
On Fri, 08 Aug 2014 13:25:50 -1000, dsi1
> wrote: >On 8/8/2014 12:23 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote: >> >> I would guess the change in cap design allowed the system to form a >> vacuum of a few psi instead of letting the reservoir suck in air as it >> cooled. The vacuum would have caused the hoses to slightly collapse >> when cool. That would prevent a lot of "fresh air" full of oxygen >> from getting in and reacting with the dexcool and degrading it. >> > >The old Lumina cap had a design that prevented a vacuum from forming in >the radiator. If there's no vacuum present, water won't be sucked back >into the radiator from the coolant reservoir on cool-down. What gives? >OTOH, I suppose that all that doesn't matter much these days. With the coolant recovery system there is not supposed to be any air IN the engine side of the cooling system. There will be air inside the coolant recovery bottle (on top of the coolant that's in it) but that air is OUTside the actual cooling system. So when the engine cools down the coolant will either flow back into the engine side and form a vacuum in the space above the coolant in the recovery bottle. I doubt it's much of a vacuum, you wouldn't want to collapse the bottle but a few PSI isn't going to hurt it. I'm just theorizing as to what the change might have been in the cap and why. The issue was the need to keep fresh air from being able to mix with the dexcool and the only way to prevent it is to do what you can to stop air from getting into the bottle. Not opening it keeps giant amounts from getting in when you take the cap off, forcing it to form a slight vacuum (by having a spring loaded valve in the cap) would be a way to stop air from "breathing" in and out as the engine heats and cools. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Prestone Rather Than DesCool ?
I always use Prestone, no problems yet. I change it at least once a year.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Prestone Rather Than DesCool ?
I thought Prestone specifically had a Dexcool product. Bought some back in February. Did they stop already? I could swear that's what the bottle said, as I wouldn't have put anything else, being that's what the manual calls for.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
$16 a gallon Prestone antifreeze | abcd[_2_] | Technology | 30 | September 10th 10 10:50 PM |
Prestone All Make All Model Antifreeze | mk | Chrysler | 13 | November 1st 05 04:04 PM |