CIA Bombs London

Your post reminds me of a quote by Gomez Adams:

"There's a touch of madness about."

More like a body slam than a touch, in your case, I'm afraid.

Delusional you may be, but amazing, nonetheless.

- nopcbs


"Awake" > wrote in message
...
> As the smoke begins to clear we see the same pattern develop as after
> 9-11-2001.
> The perpetrator (the fictional "Al Qaeda") is immediately named by the
> media. The
> political agenda -whatever it may have been- is gone and replaced by the
> "War on Terror".
> Issues such as poverty and domestic spending priorities are pushed off the
> map.
> Political dissenters find little tolerance and may find themselves warned
> to shut up
> and get with the program (throw up the one arm salute!).
>
> And what of the evidence for this being a strike by "Al Qaeda"? Oh, there
> will be no
> investigation of that by the media. All claims by the "security services"
> will be transmitted
> unquestioned. No blame will befall MI6. Instead the budgets for security
> will immediately
> go up. Civil liberties will be retracted in order to "fight terror".
>
> So while the blast is still topical and before things are pushed down the
> Orwellian memory
> hole let us examine this supposed "claim of responsibility". Here in
> America there has never
> been even the slightest attention paid to the details of any "claim of
> responsibility". All we
> get is that "the CIA confirms".
>
> In the Guardian on July 9, 2005 David Gallister reports that the claim was
> made on a Web site
> registered by "Qalaah Qalaah in Abu Dhabi" and the site was hosted not in
> the mysterious
> mountains of Pakistan, but "by a server in Houston, Texas".
>
> Oh my.
>
> Now we Americans reading this can see why we are never given details.
>
> It gets worse actually because even this is not traceable to any
> webmaster. The claim is on
> a "forum" where anyone can post. That means some kid could have posted
> this child like
> claim of an organization called "the Secret Organisation of the al-Qaida
> Jihad in Europe".
>
> Sounds like something from Batman.
>
> Almost a year ago a man in San Francisco named Benjamin Vanderford faked
> his own
> beheading and uploaded the video through file sharing programs. His
> "beheading" was
> then reported as fact by the "American" media, in fact they seemed gleeful
> to have such
> a gory incident to report.
>
> The only thing different here is that we have real dead bodies, but there
> is no evidence
> whatsoever to point to any "terror group".
>
> However, we can do some theorizing. Let's look at that language of the
> claim that was
> made at www.al-qal3ah.com . "The Secret Organisation of the al-Qaida Jihad
> in Europe",
> oh my doesn't that sound evil! Kind of like the "axis of evil" and
> referring to unnamed people
> as "evil doers" and "bad guys".
>
> Who does that? Perhaps it is better to ask "who writes that for Dubya to
> say?"
>
> Climate change? Debt forgiveness for Africa? World poverty? Peace in the
> Middle East?
>
> Poof!
>
> Replaced by the "War on Terror"!
>
> Can you see the smile on Dubya's face?
>
> They're all smiles at Langley and Tel Aviv as well.
>
>
> - - - - - -
> "According to Michael Moloney, Gehring had even applied to
> the CIA, and used to tell a story about it. The marine from
> Dayton 'had no academic credentials,' Moloney relates, but
> the CIA 'liked his attitude. "The world is full of commie *******s
> and all I wanted to do at that time was kill, kill, kill."'
> Moloney quotes Gehring as having said."
> -Jonathan Kwitny,"The Crimes of Patriots" ISBN: 0-393-02387-7
>
>

In article >,
Awake > wrote:
> And what of the evidence for this being a strike by "Al Qaeda"? Oh,
> there will be no investigation of that by the media. All claims by the
> "security services" will be transmitted unquestioned. No blame will
> befall MI6. Instead the budgets for security will immediately go up.
> Civil liberties will be retracted in order to "fight terror".

The UK has one of the most sophisticated CCTV network in the world.
Including the buses. And the recorder in the bus almost certainly
survived. The checking of the relevant tapes will be a vast task - and
carried out by police and other security services. If a security member
(from any country) is caught boarding that bus and has survived he would
be a prime witness. If he left the bus before the incident he will be as
much a suspect as any other who did - although there's still the
possibility it was a suicide bomber. The bus is the prime choice for the
most thorough investigation since it carries less than 100 passengers. And
this is being done, including forensic investigation of all other passing
or parked vehicles hit by the explosion.
A crowded tube has thousands plus all the others waiting at the station,
etc. To the best of my knowledge there aren't cameras in every carriage.

--
*If all the world is a stage, where is the audience sitting?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:37:29 -0400, "SwStudio"
> wrote:

>"AL" > wrote in messag
>> Get a life. This is a car newsgroup. Your posting on the wrong site.
>> IF you think the CIA is behind this mess, watch out they are right behind
>> you. BOOO....
>
>You own a BMW and you don't know the difference between
>"your" and "you're"?

We heard you the first time.
--
Dan.