If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
In what distance would a Bugatti Veyron beat that Vauxhall dragster?
On Jul 16, 8:06 am, "Burgerman" > wrote:
> I see you cut all the stuff you didnt like again... > I have forgotten more about really fast cars and bikes than <snip self-aggrandizing> I said I was done with this but thought I'd share with the world what I just found while clearing out my spamcatcher e-mail address. Spaketh Burgerman in e-mail: ">> Its accellerating harder at 150 than the veyron can off the line! > > > The Veyron does 0 - 60 in 2.46 on street tires. Are you asserting that > Vauxhall is going to do 150 - 212 in 2.5 secs? Approximately yes." How 'bout that. Yet another instance of you saying what you're swearing up and down you never said. |
Ads |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
In what distance would a Bugatti Veyron beat that Vauxhall dragster?
"Doc" > wrote in message
ps.com... > On Jul 16, 8:06 am, "Burgerman" > wrote: > >> I see you cut all the stuff you didnt like again... >> I have forgotten more about really fast cars and bikes than > > > <snip self-aggrandizing> > > > I said I was done with this but thought I'd share with the world what > I just found while clearing out my spamcatcher e-mail address. > > Spaketh Burgerman in e-mail: > > ">> Its accellerating harder at 150 than the veyron can off the line! >> >> >> The Veyron does 0 - 60 in 2.46 on street tires. Are you asserting > that >> Vauxhall is going to do 150 - 212 in 2.5 secs? > > > Approximately yes." > > > How 'bout that. Yet another instance of you saying what you're > swearing up and down you never said. > Look. You claimed that the comparison was laughable. Now it seems that you were a bit wrong. You can pick bits of sentences out of huge posts all you like, it does not alter the fact that the veyron is outgunned at all speeds by the "laughable" vauxhall. Right up to and including its top speed. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
In what distance would a Bugatti Veyron beat that Vauxhall dragster?
On Jul 19, 4:19 pm, "Burgerman" > wrote:
> You can pick bits of sentences out of huge posts all you like, It's more than simply "picking apart sentences". You make all this puffery and noise about comprehension of what a car can do blah blah blah etc. , and then demonstrate that you have no earthly idea. And then waste bandwidth trying to backtrack. Btw, yes, I'm fully aware of how fast a top-fueler is and they too make the big part of their speed/time in the very early stages and experience diminishing returns as they go down the track. > it does not > alter the fact that the veyron is outgunned Unless of course they happen to be going around corners. Btw, you've never actually seen these two cars race at over 200. AFAIK, only one of them has actually proven it's stable and roadworthy at those speeds. Of course we're talking about a tin can some guy shoved a big engine into in his garage -vs- $1.5 million worth of engineering. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
In what distance would a Bugatti Veyron beat that Vauxhall dragster?
"Doc" > wrote in message
ps.com... > On Jul 19, 4:19 pm, "Burgerman" > wrote: > > >> You can pick bits of sentences out of huge posts all you like, > > > It's more than simply "picking apart sentences". You make all this > puffery and noise about comprehension of what a car can do blah blah > blah etc. , and then demonstrate that you have no earthly idea. And > then waste bandwidth trying to backtrack. > > Btw, yes, I'm fully aware of how fast a top-fueler is and they too > make the big part of their speed/time in the very early stages and > experience diminishing returns as they go down the track. > > >> it does not >> alter the fact that the veyron is outgunned > > > Unless of course they happen to be going around corners. Your post said straight line. No corners. Now we have corners? > > > Btw, you've never actually seen these two cars race at over 200. > AFAIK, only one of them has actually proven it's stable and roadworthy > at those speeds. Of course we're talking about a tin can some guy > shoved a big engine into in his garage -vs- $1.5 million worth of > engineering. > Again you cut all the stuff you didnt like and are clutching at straws. The veyron is slower accelerating by miles at ALL speeds and would never pass the vauxhall at any point on the extended straight run that you asked about when you claimed it was laughable! No amount of picking at the huge thread that you keep cutting is ever going to change that. You may worship the veyron in some religous way ignoring the facts as religous nuts do but the vauxhall is simply much faster. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|