Why republicans shouldn't be allowed to drive

TV's David W Poole, Jr. wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:40:53 -0500, "MC Pee Pants"
> > was understood to have stated the following:
>
>>TV's David W. Poole, Jr. wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 03:18:14 -0500, "MC Pee Pants"
>>> > was understood to have stated the following:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ah, coming from the mental midget who watches Sesame Street like it's a
>>>>religion. Tell me something, David. Are you Bert or Ernie?
>>>
>>> None of the above. No wonder you can't get anything right.
>>
>>*PLONK*
>>
>>I got that one right.
>
> Oh boo hoo; a retard plonked me. What ever am I to do.

Oh, boo hoo. A ****stain changed his email address to evade my killfile.

--

Beliefs are dangerous. Beliefs allow the mind to stop functioning.
A non-functioning mind is clinically dead. Believe in nothing.
- Maynard James Keenan

"David W. Poole, Jr." > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 03:18:14 -0500, "MC Pee Pants"
> > was understood to have stated the following:
>
>>
>>Ah, coming from the mental midget who watches Sesame Street like it's a
>>religion. Tell me something, David. Are you Bert or Ernie?
>
> None of the above. No wonder you can't get anything right.
>

Repeat after me:

"Bush lied. People died."

I'm waiting for him to say "read my lips: no new taxes" :-r

MC Pee Pants wrote:
> TV's DTJ wrote:
> > On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 21:00:10 -0400, Nate Nagel >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> David W. Poole, Jr. wrote:
> >>
> >>> As for beliefs, I would prefer to be an ignorant conservative over an
> >>> ignorant liberal; the liberals can't seem to figure out which side of
> >>> the issues they are on.
> >>
> >> I agree, but where can you find a conservative at all these days?
> >>
> >> nate
> >
> > Hi there.
> >
> > Seriously, I am a conservative. I see things in both parties I like.
> > I hate how the democratic party is moving farther and farther left,
> > and I am not fond of some things the republicans are doing.
> >
> > That said, the lesser of two evils is, IMO, the republicans.
>
> If you don't care about civil rights or national security, sure.

....or property rights...oh wait the Libs in the SC threw those out the
window
>
> --
>
> Beliefs are dangerous. Beliefs allow the mind to stop functioning.
> A non-functioning mind is clinically dead. Believe in nothing.
> - Maynard James Keenan

TV's Mr Sparkle wrote:
> MC Pee Pants wrote:
>> TV's DTJ wrote:
>> > On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 21:00:10 -0400, Nate Nagel >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> David W. Poole, Jr. wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> As for beliefs, I would prefer to be an ignorant conservative over an
>> >>> ignorant liberal; the liberals can't seem to figure out which side of
>> >>> the issues they are on.
>> >>
>> >> I agree, but where can you find a conservative at all these days?
>> >>
>> >> nate
>> >
>> > Hi there.
>> >
>> > Seriously, I am a conservative. I see things in both parties I like.
>> > I hate how the democratic party is moving farther and farther left,
>> > and I am not fond of some things the republicans are doing.
>> >
>> > That said, the lesser of two evils is, IMO, the republicans.
>>
>> If you don't care about civil rights or national security, sure.
>
> ...or property rights...oh wait the Libs in the SC threw those out the
> window

There aren't any true "liberals" on the supreme court. Just some
right-wingers and a couple of right-leaning moderates.

--

Beliefs are dangerous. Beliefs allow the mind to stop functioning.
A non-functioning mind is clinically dead. Believe in nothing.
- Maynard James Keenan

In article .com>,
"Mr Sparkle" > wrote:

> MC Pee Pants wrote:
> > TV's DTJ wrote:
> > > On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 21:00:10 -0400, Nate Nagel >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> David W. Poole, Jr. wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> As for beliefs, I would prefer to be an ignorant conservative over an
> > >>> ignorant liberal; the liberals can't seem to figure out which side of
> > >>> the issues they are on.
> > >>
> > >> I agree, but where can you find a conservative at all these days?
> > >>
> > >> nate
> > >
> > > Hi there.
> > >
> > > Seriously, I am a conservative. I see things in both parties I like.
> > > I hate how the democratic party is moving farther and farther left,
> > > and I am not fond of some things the republicans are doing.
> > >
> > > That said, the lesser of two evils is, IMO, the republicans.
> >
> > If you don't care about civil rights or national security, sure.
>
> ...or property rights...oh wait the Libs in the SC threw those out the
> window

Not really. First off, I don't know a single liberal who likes that
ruling, but even that ruling does not through property rights out the
window. The ruling simply said its a state matter and states have the
option of banning the use of eminent domain for commercial purposes.
This is why there is a new push in many states to strengthen their
eminent domain laws.

Shawn Hirn wrote:
>
> In article .com>,
> "Mr Sparkle" > wrote:
>
> > MC Pee Pants wrote:
> > > TV's DTJ wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 21:00:10 -0400, Nate Nagel >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> David W. Poole, Jr. wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> As for beliefs, I would prefer to be an ignorant conservative over an
> > > >>> ignorant liberal; the liberals can't seem to figure out which side of
> > > >>> the issues they are on.
> > > >>
> > > >> I agree, but where can you find a conservative at all these days?
> > > >>
> > > >> nate
> > > >
> > > > Hi there.
> > > >
> > > > Seriously, I am a conservative. I see things in both parties I like.
> > > > I hate how the democratic party is moving farther and farther left,
> > > > and I am not fond of some things the republicans are doing.
> > > >
> > > > That said, the lesser of two evils is, IMO, the republicans.
> > >
> > > If you don't care about civil rights or national security, sure.
> >
> > ...or property rights...oh wait the Libs in the SC threw those out the
> > window
>
> Not really. First off, I don't know a single liberal who likes that
> ruling, but even that ruling does not through property rights out the
> window. The ruling simply said its a state matter and states have the
> option of banning the use of eminent domain for commercial purposes.
> This is why there is a new push in many states to strengthen their
> eminent domain laws.

Isn't that a little like the foxes demanding better henhouse security?

--
Cheers,
Bev
================================================== =
"I love deadlines... especially the whooshing sound
they make as they go by." -Douglas Adams

Shawn Hirn wrote:

> In article .com>,
> "Mr Sparkle" > wrote:
>
>>MC Pee Pants wrote:
>>
>>>TV's DTJ wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 21:00:10 -0400, Nate Nagel >
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>David W. Poole, Jr. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>As for beliefs, I would prefer to be an ignorant conservative over an
>>>>>>ignorant liberal; the liberals can't seem to figure out which side of
>>>>>>the issues they are on.
>>>>>
>>>>>I agree, but where can you find a conservative at all these days?
>>>>>
>>>>>nate
>>>>
>>>>Hi there.
>>>>
>>>>Seriously, I am a conservative. I see things in both parties I like.
>>>>I hate how the democratic party is moving farther and farther left,
>>>>and I am not fond of some things the republicans are doing.
>>>>
>>>>That said, the lesser of two evils is, IMO, the republicans.
>>>
>>>If you don't care about civil rights or national security, sure.
>>
>>...or property rights...oh wait the Libs in the SC threw those out the
>>window
>
> Not really. First off, I don't know a single liberal who likes that
> ruling, but even that ruling does not through property rights out the
> window. The ruling simply said its a state matter and states have the
> option of banning the use of eminent domain for commercial purposes.
> This is why there is a new push in many states to strengthen their
> eminent domain laws.

Why are you even arguing with moron nutjobs who couldn't ID
the constitution if you put a copy under their noses?