A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Chrysler
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

air bag injuries due to propellant chemicals



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old November 5th 04, 04:42 PM
linda
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matt Whiting wrote:
> Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Dan Gates wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Sometimes the cure hurts a few a little bit. But it saves most people
>>> that have to use it.

>>
>>
>>
>> Christ, here we go again with another true-believer airbag freak who
>> hasn't looked at the actual numbers, hasn't seen that statistically
>> one is
>> safer with a 3-point belt and NO airbag than one is with a 3-point belt
>> AND an airbag, but nevertheless he's absolutely sure that airbatgs are
>> the
>> "cure".

>
>
> And safer still with a five-point harness, a full-face helmet and Nomex
> suit. The reality is that many people don't use their seat belts and
> thus the air bag is what we get.
>
>
> Matt



Matt, i think what you are talking about is more in David's (deadbeat)
area of concern.. might want to talk to him...

lw
>

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.