air bag injuries due to propellant chemicals

matt,

yes, and i always have preferred that... i use for this purpose Mozilla
thunderbird. if yall prefer i can go to outlook, outlook express.. let
me know.. i don't want this to be an issue when i am trying to talk
about other matters..

thank you.

linda

Matt Whiting wrote:
> Bob Shuman wrote:
>
>> Linda,
>>
>> I personally prefer "top posting" as you have done (and I have done
>> here as
>> well). This is the way my newsreader works by default and also allows
>> me to
>> read threads in order so I don't need to waste time skipping down to the
>> body of each message.
>
>
> Which newsreader so you use? I use Netscape and it shows messages and
> replies as they were made. To read the thread in order requires bottom
> posting. Are you saying that your newsreader automatically moves a top
> post to the bottom when it is viewed to allow the thread to remain in
> order?
>
>
> Matt
>

matt, yes, i can read back and forth, up and down, and most of the time
i can and am allowed to read the ending of a book first. and if you
knew what you wrote to begin with then a reply at the top would make
sense, however, i will try to comply with everyones wwishes. and
Chrysler is aware of the airbag propellant problem, just ask Deadbeat,
he works there.. he won't tell you the truth.. i am not an ACTIVIST, i
am a researcher trying to better your planet.. (which one was it anyway?)

lw

Matt Whiting wrote:
> linda wrote:
>
>> Thank you Bob. i am a newby in all areas of this research and thought
>> i could learn some things... apparently, i have learned that i am a
>> typical stupid **** and i don't use proper capitalization, and am
>> probably related to some douche bag who sues at the drop of a
>> hat...also, i am fodder for 'experienced NGs". i will become thick
>> skinned, and i will learn... i am not a spammer, troll, etc..
>> i am here to learn.... and i guess i have learned the first and the
>> hardest lesson... and if otherrs think they have heard the last of
>> me, well, they need to think again!
>
>
> It would be nice if you would show us the courtesy to post in a
> newsgroup dedicated to political/activist topics, rather than this one
> which is specific to Chryslers. Airbag safety isn't unique to Chryslers
> insofar as I'm aware.
>
>
>> thanks for the info...
>>
>> linda
>>
>> p.s. please excuse the fact that i wrote ABOVE your email, instead of
>> below it, this is one lesson i can't seem to understand.. but if that
>> is the worst i do, then people will have to deal with it...
>
>
> You really don't understand that English is read from left to right and
> top to bottom? Do you read books backwards? Posting at the top
> requires you to read the message backwards chronologically. This simply
> isn't convention in the English speaking and reading world. And the
> fact the this is the default in some newsreaders is not a reasonable
> excuse.
>
>
> Matt
>

matt, yes, i can read back and forth, up and down, and most of the time
i can and am allowed to read the ending of a book first. and if you
knew what you wrote to begin with then a reply at the top would make
sense, however, i will try to comply with everyones wwishes. and
Chrysler is aware of the airbag propellant problem, just ask Deadbeat,
he works there.. he won't tell you the truth.. i am not an ACTIVIST, i
am a researcher trying to better your planet.. (which one was it anyway?)

lw

Matt Whiting wrote:
> linda wrote:
>
>> Thank you Bob. i am a newby in all areas of this research and thought
>> i could learn some things... apparently, i have learned that i am a
>> typical stupid **** and i don't use proper capitalization, and am
>> probably related to some douche bag who sues at the drop of a
>> hat...also, i am fodder for 'experienced NGs". i will become thick
>> skinned, and i will learn... i am not a spammer, troll, etc..
>> i am here to learn.... and i guess i have learned the first and the
>> hardest lesson... and if otherrs think they have heard the last of
>> me, well, they need to think again!
>
>
> It would be nice if you would show us the courtesy to post in a
> newsgroup dedicated to political/activist topics, rather than this one
> which is specific to Chryslers. Airbag safety isn't unique to Chryslers
> insofar as I'm aware.
>
>
>> thanks for the info...
>>
>> linda
>>
>> p.s. please excuse the fact that i wrote ABOVE your email, instead of
>> below it, this is one lesson i can't seem to understand.. but if that
>> is the worst i do, then people will have to deal with it...
>
>
> You really don't understand that English is read from left to right and
> top to bottom? Do you read books backwards? Posting at the top
> requires you to read the message backwards chronologically. This simply
> isn't convention in the English speaking and reading world. And the
> fact the this is the default in some newsreaders is not a reasonable
> excuse.
>
>
> Matt
>

Matt Whiting wrote:
> linda wrote:
>
>> To Bill and Ted ONLY:
>>
>> i can do two things in regards to your being rude and mean....
>>
>> 1. tuck my tail and run ....
>>
>> 2. remind my self that the world is filled with assholes and go
>> on...i like option 2...
>
>
> Ah, the true colors always show through eventually.
>
>
>> Your posts are the world's greatest proof of reincarnation; no one
>> could get that dumb in just one lifetime.
>
>
>
> Which life are you on? Just trying to get a calibration here. :-)
>
>
> Matt


i am probably on the same life level as you are..

did you read your email first so that you could remember what you said
to me, so that my response would make sense?

linda

Matt Whiting wrote:
> linda wrote:
>
>> To Bill and Ted ONLY:
>>
>> i can do two things in regards to your being rude and mean....
>>
>> 1. tuck my tail and run ....
>>
>> 2. remind my self that the world is filled with assholes and go
>> on...i like option 2...
>
>
> Ah, the true colors always show through eventually.
>
>
>> Your posts are the world's greatest proof of reincarnation; no one
>> could get that dumb in just one lifetime.
>
>
>
> Which life are you on? Just trying to get a calibration here. :-)
>
>
> Matt


i am probably on the same life level as you are..

did you read your email first so that you could remember what you said
to me, so that my response would make sense?

linda

linda wrote:

> matt,
>
> yes, and i always have preferred that... i use for this purpose Mozilla
> thunderbird. if yall prefer i can go to outlook, outlook express.. let
> me know.. i don't want this to be an issue when i am trying to talk
> about other matters..

I'm not familiar with Thunderbird, but I use Netscape which is Mozilla
based as well and it lets me select either top or bottom posting. I
suspect, but don't know for sure, that Thunderbird also is configurable.


Matt

linda wrote:

> matt,
>
> yes, and i always have preferred that... i use for this purpose Mozilla
> thunderbird. if yall prefer i can go to outlook, outlook express.. let
> me know.. i don't want this to be an issue when i am trying to talk
> about other matters..

I'm not familiar with Thunderbird, but I use Netscape which is Mozilla
based as well and it lets me select either top or bottom posting. I
suspect, but don't know for sure, that Thunderbird also is configurable.


Matt

linda wrote:

> matt, yes, i can read back and forth, up and down, and most of the time
> i can and am allowed to read the ending of a book first. and if you
> knew what you wrote to begin with then a reply at the top would make
> sense, however, i will try to comply with everyones wwishes. and
> Chrysler is aware of the airbag propellant problem, just ask Deadbeat,
> he works there.. he won't tell you the truth.. i am not an ACTIVIST, i
> am a researcher trying to better your planet.. (which one was it anyway?)

No, you are someone who has too much time on their hands and thus looks
for trouble. And, I'm quite willing to look out for myself. Why do you
liberals feel compelled to "help" those of us who are more than willing
to take responsibility for ourselves?


Matt

linda wrote:

> matt, yes, i can read back and forth, up and down, and most of the time
> i can and am allowed to read the ending of a book first. and if you
> knew what you wrote to begin with then a reply at the top would make
> sense, however, i will try to comply with everyones wwishes. and
> Chrysler is aware of the airbag propellant problem, just ask Deadbeat,
> he works there.. he won't tell you the truth.. i am not an ACTIVIST, i
> am a researcher trying to better your planet.. (which one was it anyway?)

No, you are someone who has too much time on their hands and thus looks
for trouble. And, I'm quite willing to look out for myself. Why do you
liberals feel compelled to "help" those of us who are more than willing
to take responsibility for ourselves?


Matt

linda wrote:

> did you read your email first so that you could remember what you said
> to me, so that my response would make sense?

I don't read unsolicited or unexpected email.


Matt