air bag injuries due to propellant chemicals

Matthew, i am sorry, i got so into getting off the subject i actually
came to learn about.. .can you email me about your experience? i am
just researching, i am not litigating anything.. i just want to know...
i care.. believe it or not... i have been accused of being, well you
read david's emails... i may be a newbie in all senses of the word and
the worlds cruelties, but i am not uncaring like some i have seen and i
am not blind and do not believe everything i have been told...

if you don't want to share your experience with me in more detail, i
understand.. you are always free to email me directly at home...

linda


Matthew Russotto wrote:
> In article >,
> Dori A Schmetterling > wrote:
>
>>In case you are referrng to leaks while just driving along, there aren't
>>any.
>>
>>As regards gas poisoning on air bag deployment, I am not aware of any
>>reports, nor of any long-term effects. Could be that the survivors are so
>>grateful to be alive that they don't care about a brief respiratory
>>annoyance, which they might not notice anyway if they are otherwise injured.
>
>
> _I_ sure as hell noticed it. It was pretty bad, even given the open
> area of my Miata. And the airbag did me no good, contacting only my
> right arm (scraping it) while my seat belt kept the rest of my body
> from contacting it.
>
>
>>Certainly air bags have given rise to new types of injury, or at least
>>changed the injury profile in car accidents. Two 'common' ones are whiplash
>>and skin burn (from the bag fabric rubbing against skin).. and so? Give me
>>these any day...
>
>
> Against nothing at all? Why?

i really don't understand your comment, please explain in little words
so that i can understand.....

linda

Mot Adv-NSW wrote:
> "linda" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>please do not belittle my concern. i understand the problems associated
>>with getting in to a car.. the guy next to me could have had a bit too
>>much to drink and crash in to me and my casket will have to be closed...i
>>am informed about these things you mention, but i am mad as hell about
>>not being properly informed about the chemical hazards associated with the
>>deployment of the "life saving" apparatus'.
>>
>>thanks you for your cute email..
>>i hope you have a great day...
>>
>>linda
>
>
> Frig! The world is being made to your level.
>
>

i really don't understand your comment, please explain in little words
so that i can understand.....

linda

Mot Adv-NSW wrote:
> "linda" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>please do not belittle my concern. i understand the problems associated
>>with getting in to a car.. the guy next to me could have had a bit too
>>much to drink and crash in to me and my casket will have to be closed...i
>>am informed about these things you mention, but i am mad as hell about
>>not being properly informed about the chemical hazards associated with the
>>deployment of the "life saving" apparatus'.
>>
>>thanks you for your cute email..
>>i hope you have a great day...
>>
>>linda
>
>
> Frig! The world is being made to your level.
>
>

thank you Dori for the tip... i am new here, and want to learn... your
help is appreciated...

lwatkins at midsouth {dot} rr {com}



Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
> Tip: Don't post your real address in correct form, or show it as the sender.
>
> This will attract lots of spam. Have you not noticed how many people use
> fake addresses? A number will write out how to contact them in the body of
> the address, e.g.
>
> lwatkins at midsouth {dot} rr {dot} com.
>
> Spiders are crawling everywhere. I have direct evidence from my own
> experience when starting to post to NGs.
>
> DAS

thank you Dori for the tip... i am new here, and want to learn... your
help is appreciated...

lwatkins at midsouth {dot} rr {com}



Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
> Tip: Don't post your real address in correct form, or show it as the sender.
>
> This will attract lots of spam. Have you not noticed how many people use
> fake addresses? A number will write out how to contact them in the body of
> the address, e.g.
>
> lwatkins at midsouth {dot} rr {dot} com.
>
> Spiders are crawling everywhere. I have direct evidence from my own
> experience when starting to post to NGs.
>
> DAS

Daviid, i have a question.. if air bags are not dangerous, why are so
many people taking "them out of the ****ing car"?

hmmmm

lw

deadbeat wrote:
> If you are just researching this now, why are you condemning the airbags
> already! Typical stupid **** who wants to complain, and sue the
> manufacturers for having airbags. If you don't like them, take them out of
> the ****ing car!
>
> Probably related to the douche bag who sued Honda for not having an airbag
> in the car, before the were mandated.
>
> "linda" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>http://dmses.dot.gov/docimages/pdf10/11590_web.pdf
>>
>>
>>i really have heard of people with major difficulites from the chemical
>>hazards (Sodium Azide, Nitrogen, phosgene) associated with air bags.
>>and if those "airbags are the cure" folks would kindly look at the link
>>i provided above (Federal Register / Vol. 60,November 9, 1995 / Proposed
>>Rules) you will see that they do not talk about any respiratory
>>illnessess associated with the dangerous chemicals. Please also check
>>http://dms.dot.gov/reports/ and do a simple search on air bags, and no
>>where will you find any mention of respiratory illnesses associated with
>>the chemical hazards. Please check your MSDS (Material Safety Data
>>Sheet) for each of these chemicals and see if you think that "the cure
>>hurts a few a little bit".. Just pray to whatever entity you pray to
>>that you are never inflicted with this type of injury. I am assuming
>>that some would prefer a closed casket rather than a respiratory illness
>>to live with a long time...
>>
>>please forgive my harshness, but i am new at this and i am in the
>>process of researching this and would appreciate information that is
>>useful and not blatantly disregarding my honest approaches at trying to
>>help ALL.
>>
>>linda
>>
>>Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Dan Gates wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sometimes the cure hurts a few a little bit. But it saves most people
>>>>that have to use it.
>>>
>>>
>>>Christ, here we go again with another true-believer airbag freak who
>>>hasn't looked at the actual numbers, hasn't seen that statistically one
>
> is
>
>>>safer with a 3-point belt and NO airbag than one is with a 3-point belt
>>>AND an airbag, but nevertheless he's absolutely sure that airbatgs are
>
> the
>
>>>"cure".
>
>
>

Daviid, i have a question.. if air bags are not dangerous, why are so
many people taking "them out of the ****ing car"?

hmmmm

lw

deadbeat wrote:
> If you are just researching this now, why are you condemning the airbags
> already! Typical stupid **** who wants to complain, and sue the
> manufacturers for having airbags. If you don't like them, take them out of
> the ****ing car!
>
> Probably related to the douche bag who sued Honda for not having an airbag
> in the car, before the were mandated.
>
> "linda" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>http://dmses.dot.gov/docimages/pdf10/11590_web.pdf
>>
>>
>>i really have heard of people with major difficulites from the chemical
>>hazards (Sodium Azide, Nitrogen, phosgene) associated with air bags.
>>and if those "airbags are the cure" folks would kindly look at the link
>>i provided above (Federal Register / Vol. 60,November 9, 1995 / Proposed
>>Rules) you will see that they do not talk about any respiratory
>>illnessess associated with the dangerous chemicals. Please also check
>>http://dms.dot.gov/reports/ and do a simple search on air bags, and no
>>where will you find any mention of respiratory illnesses associated with
>>the chemical hazards. Please check your MSDS (Material Safety Data
>>Sheet) for each of these chemicals and see if you think that "the cure
>>hurts a few a little bit".. Just pray to whatever entity you pray to
>>that you are never inflicted with this type of injury. I am assuming
>>that some would prefer a closed casket rather than a respiratory illness
>>to live with a long time...
>>
>>please forgive my harshness, but i am new at this and i am in the
>>process of researching this and would appreciate information that is
>>useful and not blatantly disregarding my honest approaches at trying to
>>help ALL.
>>
>>linda
>>
>>Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Dan Gates wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sometimes the cure hurts a few a little bit. But it saves most people
>>>>that have to use it.
>>>
>>>
>>>Christ, here we go again with another true-believer airbag freak who
>>>hasn't looked at the actual numbers, hasn't seen that statistically one
>
> is
>
>>>safer with a 3-point belt and NO airbag than one is with a 3-point belt
>>>AND an airbag, but nevertheless he's absolutely sure that airbatgs are
>
> the
>
>>>"cure".
>
>
>

Where. You said I was in a location with ECE etc air bags etc. The rest of
it was vitriolic. No need for that. Don't bother telling me again that you
treat all stupid posts the same, that it's not personal etc.

DAS
--
For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
n.umich.edu...
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
>
>> Fine, just add the "non-US" prefix.
>
> I did. You ignored it.

Where. You said I was in a location with ECE etc air bags etc. The rest of
it was vitriolic. No need for that. Don't bother telling me again that you
treat all stupid posts the same, that it's not personal etc.

DAS
--
For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
n.umich.edu...
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Dori A Schmetterling wrote:
>
>> Fine, just add the "non-US" prefix.
>
> I did. You ignored it.

deadbeat wrote:
>
>
> P.S. it's the internet, and newsgroups are for opinions. If your researching
> you should research all opinions. Not just the ones YOU want. You know, like
> the ones Bush wanted! To prove to his father by chasing Saddam out of power,
> by lying about weapons of mass destruction! Only cost Billions of dollars
> and untold amount of innocent lives of our troops. Just so George W can say
> " Dad, Are you proud of me know! I got rid of Saddam for you" But then again
> his research for Weapons of mass destruction, was the research he wanted to
> hear! Not what the rest of the entire free world had researched! THE ARE NO
> WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION! By the way George W. if you are watching this
> newsgroup, Osama is in Afganistan! Do you need a new map to go get him?

Deadbeat Dave, i don't believe i saw your name on my ballot when i went
to vote...i am sure George would listen to you if you had real info..
why not email him yourself..