If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#341
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:19:45 GMT, linda >
wrote: >> How about YOU supply a cite for the John Wayne assertion? NOWHERE >> can I find ANY reference to his being other than heterosexual, and >> none of the readily-available Internet biographies, official or non-official, >> make any such claim. >> >> What I can find is that he was married three times, and had seven >> children, was a strident anti-communist, an ardent supporter of the U.S. >> forces in Vietnam, and in general lived the larger-than-life image >> frequently associated with him. None of these things preclude him from >> possibly being bisexual, I suppose. But if you can't produce >> incontrovertable evidence, I will be forced to conclude this is either >> a.) a smear job, b.) a delusion, or c.) a misunderstanding. >> >> John Wayne Gacy is widely reputed to be gay, perhaps that is the source of your >> confusion. >> >> --Geoff > >Geoff, i can here you saying this: "if anyone says The Duke was gay, >I'll beat the snot out of you. Same with Errol Flynn. They were Men's >Men, and yer a Commie Pinko if you think otherwise. " If that's really what you "here", then you have a problem. That's not anywhere near what was written. What was written was a request for some sort of evidence to support your claim. -- Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
Ads |
#342
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:19:45 GMT, linda >
wrote: >> How about YOU supply a cite for the John Wayne assertion? NOWHERE >> can I find ANY reference to his being other than heterosexual, and >> none of the readily-available Internet biographies, official or non-official, >> make any such claim. >> >> What I can find is that he was married three times, and had seven >> children, was a strident anti-communist, an ardent supporter of the U.S. >> forces in Vietnam, and in general lived the larger-than-life image >> frequently associated with him. None of these things preclude him from >> possibly being bisexual, I suppose. But if you can't produce >> incontrovertable evidence, I will be forced to conclude this is either >> a.) a smear job, b.) a delusion, or c.) a misunderstanding. >> >> John Wayne Gacy is widely reputed to be gay, perhaps that is the source of your >> confusion. >> >> --Geoff > >Geoff, i can here you saying this: "if anyone says The Duke was gay, >I'll beat the snot out of you. Same with Errol Flynn. They were Men's >Men, and yer a Commie Pinko if you think otherwise. " If that's really what you "here", then you have a problem. That's not anywhere near what was written. What was written was a request for some sort of evidence to support your claim. -- Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#343
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:30:16 GMT, linda >
wrote: >Big Bill wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:27:23 GMT, linda > >> wrote: >> >> >>>>Where are you getting this? You* do* realize that, despite the >>>>descrimination against them, gays are productive members of society, >>>>don't you? >>>>No where am I saying that white males aren't doing anything. I'm >>>>saying they are being discriminated against. >>>> >>>>Bill Funk >>>>Change "g" to "a" >>> >>> >>>Bill, being a white female from the south, that argument won't fly with >>>me... i would have to disagree just based on my experience.. nothing >>>scientific... just my own personal experience... >>> >>> >>>Gays are and have always been productive members of society. to name a few: >> >> >> I think you didn't quite understand what I wrote: >> "You* do* realize that, despite the descrimination against them, gays >> are productive members of society, don't you?" >> > > >please read preious posting... regarding the same subject.. i was >agreeing with you and citing documentation which seems to be necessary >for stating any opinion on the NG... > >lw Yes, that was a repost, because my first one didn't show up here, and this was posted before I got your reply. -- Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#344
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:30:16 GMT, linda >
wrote: >Big Bill wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:27:23 GMT, linda > >> wrote: >> >> >>>>Where are you getting this? You* do* realize that, despite the >>>>descrimination against them, gays are productive members of society, >>>>don't you? >>>>No where am I saying that white males aren't doing anything. I'm >>>>saying they are being discriminated against. >>>> >>>>Bill Funk >>>>Change "g" to "a" >>> >>> >>>Bill, being a white female from the south, that argument won't fly with >>>me... i would have to disagree just based on my experience.. nothing >>>scientific... just my own personal experience... >>> >>> >>>Gays are and have always been productive members of society. to name a few: >> >> >> I think you didn't quite understand what I wrote: >> "You* do* realize that, despite the descrimination against them, gays >> are productive members of society, don't you?" >> > > >please read preious posting... regarding the same subject.. i was >agreeing with you and citing documentation which seems to be necessary >for stating any opinion on the NG... > >lw Yes, that was a repost, because my first one didn't show up here, and this was posted before I got your reply. -- Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#345
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote:
> >>Like I said, UN endorsing NAMBLA and pedophilia is > >>documented - not only here, but in the Congressional Record. > > Fine. Post a URL. > > I'll let you take care of the Cong. Record thing. You made the assertion, you back it up -- if you can. > The Wikipedia article references the > Congressional activity on the incident Must be sumpin' wrong with my browser, 'cause, um, no it doesn't. > - suffice it to say that it is indisputable that it happened and is > documented in the Cong. Record. But, Bill, as I've told you, it *doesn't* suffice that you say these things, since you're consistently unwilling to back up your assertions. You make references to websites that don't contain what you say they do, but that's not documentiong your assertion. You say you'll "let me take care of" looking for backup for your assertion, but that also isn't backing up your assertion. So far, it looks as though you're full of hot air. I'd love to be wrong, really I would, but you give me no evidence to the contrary. |
#346
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote:
> >>Like I said, UN endorsing NAMBLA and pedophilia is > >>documented - not only here, but in the Congressional Record. > > Fine. Post a URL. > > I'll let you take care of the Cong. Record thing. You made the assertion, you back it up -- if you can. > The Wikipedia article references the > Congressional activity on the incident Must be sumpin' wrong with my browser, 'cause, um, no it doesn't. > - suffice it to say that it is indisputable that it happened and is > documented in the Cong. Record. But, Bill, as I've told you, it *doesn't* suffice that you say these things, since you're consistently unwilling to back up your assertions. You make references to websites that don't contain what you say they do, but that's not documentiong your assertion. You say you'll "let me take care of" looking for backup for your assertion, but that also isn't backing up your assertion. So far, it looks as though you're full of hot air. I'd love to be wrong, really I would, but you give me no evidence to the contrary. |
#347
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote: > > >>>>Like I said, UN endorsing NAMBLA and pedophilia is >>>>documented - not only here, but in the Congressional Record. > > >>>Fine. Post a URL. >> > >>I'll let you take care of the Cong. Record thing. > > > You made the assertion, you back it up -- if you can. > > >>The Wikipedia article references the >>Congressional activity on the incident > > > Must be sumpin' wrong with my browser, 'cause, um, no it doesn't. In the article referenced in my other post that I was referring to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interna...ay_Association From that article: "In 1993, the ILGA was an organization of about 300 gay and lesbian organizations throughout the world, including NAMBLA, Martijn and other pederast/pedophile groups, as well as gay and lesbian groups that had pederast/pedophile sub-groups. "In the summer of 1993, the International Lesbian and Gay Association gained consultative status in the United Nations, as a Non-Governmental-Organization, joining 3,000 orgs throughout the world. "In October of 1993, pressure from American right-wing groups and politicians began to be exerted on ILGA to kick out its pedophile organization members. The US Mission to the UN asked ILGA to 'disassociate itself from NAMBLA and other affiliate organizations' whose 'objectives are not consonant with the UN's human rights activities'. "In November of 1993, the executive committee declared that ILGA 'condems pedophilia', contrary to some past resolutions on the matter, and asked NAMBLA, Martijn, and Project Truth to resign voluntarily from ILGA. None of the groups agreed to do so. On the 15th of November, NAMBLA issued a press release reaffirming its membership in ILGA. ******"In January 1994, the AMERICAN SENATE, on the motion of the right-wing senator Jesse Helms, UNANIMOUSLY decided that the USA had to WITHHOLD FUNDS of more than 118 million dollars due to the UN and its sub-organizations unless the President of the USA could certify to the CONGRESS by 30 September 1994 that no agency of the UNITED NATIONS 'grants any official status, accreditation or recognition to any organization which promotes, condones or seeks the legalization of pedophilia or which includes as a subsidiary or member any such organization'. (From the VSG release)"****** (emphasis added so you don't miss it) "On June 23, 1994, at the Annual Conference, NAMBLA, Martijn and Project Truth were expelled from ILGA, on the motion of the executive committee, and it was decided that 'groups or associations whose predominant aim is to support or promote pedophilia are incompatible with the future development of ILGA'." (notice the change in direction because of the action of the U.S. Congress) ...."In October 1994, the executive committee of ILGA suspended the membership of VSG, one of the LARGEST GAY GROUPS IN GERMANY, due to its vocal solidarity with NAMBLA and its REFUSAL TO PURGE PEDOPHILE MEMBERS. Its membership was suspended until the next Annual Conference of ILGA in June 1995 when the matter could be dealt with in accordance to ILGA's constitution, namely, expulsion." So, what it boils down to is that apparently the U.S. was the only voice against the UN pushing pedophilia thru its endorsements of gay rights organizations which unavoidably were highly co-mingled with pedophilia organizations. Further, if the U.S. Congress had not taken positive action in the matter (threatened to stop paying dues), pedophilia would still have the official endorsement of the UN by its sanctioning of sponsoring organizations. Created quite a stir within the homo community - kind of like what the dems have to deal with now - that to win elections nationally, they have to start disavowing themselves of gay and gay rights peripheral gay rights causes (and yes - pedophilia is one of those causes within the activist segment of the gay rights people). And about this time, your buddy Linda will object to my mentioning gays and pedophiles in the same conversation when it's clear that the gays have already determined the association by their inevitiable teaming efforts to promote common causes around the world, starting with getting the support of the UN. >>- suffice it to say that it is indisputable that it happened and is >>documented in the Cong. Record. > > > But, Bill, as I've told you, it *doesn't* suffice that you say these > things, since you're consistently unwilling to back up your assertions. You are so FOS on this. Are you blind? > You make references to websites that don't contain what you say they do, > but that's not documentiong your assertion. You say you'll "let me take > care of" looking for backup for your assertion, but that also isn't > backing up your assertion. So your false logic is that, even though the Wikipedia article generally but clearly states the Congressional action on the matter with the UN dues and the reason for that action, since I don't spoon feed you the official Congressional records on the matter, it didn't happen. I don't owe that to you. > So far, it looks as though you're full of hot air. I'd love to be wrong, > really I would, but you give me no evidence to the contrary. Whatever. I think the truth on the matter is clear to anyone else who might happen to read the sources already supplied. If I get time over the next few days, I will try to find a source for documenting the congresional activities from official sources. Something tells me that even if I do that, you still won't accept the facts of the matter. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#348
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote: > > >>>>Like I said, UN endorsing NAMBLA and pedophilia is >>>>documented - not only here, but in the Congressional Record. > > >>>Fine. Post a URL. >> > >>I'll let you take care of the Cong. Record thing. > > > You made the assertion, you back it up -- if you can. > > >>The Wikipedia article references the >>Congressional activity on the incident > > > Must be sumpin' wrong with my browser, 'cause, um, no it doesn't. In the article referenced in my other post that I was referring to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interna...ay_Association From that article: "In 1993, the ILGA was an organization of about 300 gay and lesbian organizations throughout the world, including NAMBLA, Martijn and other pederast/pedophile groups, as well as gay and lesbian groups that had pederast/pedophile sub-groups. "In the summer of 1993, the International Lesbian and Gay Association gained consultative status in the United Nations, as a Non-Governmental-Organization, joining 3,000 orgs throughout the world. "In October of 1993, pressure from American right-wing groups and politicians began to be exerted on ILGA to kick out its pedophile organization members. The US Mission to the UN asked ILGA to 'disassociate itself from NAMBLA and other affiliate organizations' whose 'objectives are not consonant with the UN's human rights activities'. "In November of 1993, the executive committee declared that ILGA 'condems pedophilia', contrary to some past resolutions on the matter, and asked NAMBLA, Martijn, and Project Truth to resign voluntarily from ILGA. None of the groups agreed to do so. On the 15th of November, NAMBLA issued a press release reaffirming its membership in ILGA. ******"In January 1994, the AMERICAN SENATE, on the motion of the right-wing senator Jesse Helms, UNANIMOUSLY decided that the USA had to WITHHOLD FUNDS of more than 118 million dollars due to the UN and its sub-organizations unless the President of the USA could certify to the CONGRESS by 30 September 1994 that no agency of the UNITED NATIONS 'grants any official status, accreditation or recognition to any organization which promotes, condones or seeks the legalization of pedophilia or which includes as a subsidiary or member any such organization'. (From the VSG release)"****** (emphasis added so you don't miss it) "On June 23, 1994, at the Annual Conference, NAMBLA, Martijn and Project Truth were expelled from ILGA, on the motion of the executive committee, and it was decided that 'groups or associations whose predominant aim is to support or promote pedophilia are incompatible with the future development of ILGA'." (notice the change in direction because of the action of the U.S. Congress) ...."In October 1994, the executive committee of ILGA suspended the membership of VSG, one of the LARGEST GAY GROUPS IN GERMANY, due to its vocal solidarity with NAMBLA and its REFUSAL TO PURGE PEDOPHILE MEMBERS. Its membership was suspended until the next Annual Conference of ILGA in June 1995 when the matter could be dealt with in accordance to ILGA's constitution, namely, expulsion." So, what it boils down to is that apparently the U.S. was the only voice against the UN pushing pedophilia thru its endorsements of gay rights organizations which unavoidably were highly co-mingled with pedophilia organizations. Further, if the U.S. Congress had not taken positive action in the matter (threatened to stop paying dues), pedophilia would still have the official endorsement of the UN by its sanctioning of sponsoring organizations. Created quite a stir within the homo community - kind of like what the dems have to deal with now - that to win elections nationally, they have to start disavowing themselves of gay and gay rights peripheral gay rights causes (and yes - pedophilia is one of those causes within the activist segment of the gay rights people). And about this time, your buddy Linda will object to my mentioning gays and pedophiles in the same conversation when it's clear that the gays have already determined the association by their inevitiable teaming efforts to promote common causes around the world, starting with getting the support of the UN. >>- suffice it to say that it is indisputable that it happened and is >>documented in the Cong. Record. > > > But, Bill, as I've told you, it *doesn't* suffice that you say these > things, since you're consistently unwilling to back up your assertions. You are so FOS on this. Are you blind? > You make references to websites that don't contain what you say they do, > but that's not documentiong your assertion. You say you'll "let me take > care of" looking for backup for your assertion, but that also isn't > backing up your assertion. So your false logic is that, even though the Wikipedia article generally but clearly states the Congressional action on the matter with the UN dues and the reason for that action, since I don't spoon feed you the official Congressional records on the matter, it didn't happen. I don't owe that to you. > So far, it looks as though you're full of hot air. I'd love to be wrong, > really I would, but you give me no evidence to the contrary. Whatever. I think the truth on the matter is clear to anyone else who might happen to read the sources already supplied. If I get time over the next few days, I will try to find a source for documenting the congresional activities from official sources. Something tells me that even if I do that, you still won't accept the facts of the matter. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#349
|
|||
|
|||
So Linda - are you smelling that Latte yet? Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#350
|
|||
|
|||
So Linda - are you smelling that Latte yet? Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_gadkypy | Michael Barnes | Driving | 4 | January 4th 05 06:47 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ mixqec | [email protected] | Chrysler | 37 | November 18th 04 04:18 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ gadkypy | Paul | Antique cars | 3 | November 9th 04 06:54 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!___________ mixqec | indago | Chrysler | 7 | November 8th 04 05:05 PM |