If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Premium fuel - production car - required?
I'm considering buying a car where the manufacturer recommends premium
fuel. The car has an 11:1 compression ratio. A salesman told me I could use regular gas without a problem; I would just sacrifice a small part of the full horsepower potential of the car. But it wouldn't ping or cause any other problems. Was the salesman just trying to make a sale? I thought if you don't use premium when you're supposed to, you get pre-ignition/pinging which is NOT good for the engine. Where I live the octane of the gas is 87 regualar, 89 silver, 93 premium. (Using the mid-grade was also something I was considering). Any comments? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Premium fuel - production car - required?
On 2014-04-09 7:36 AM, WrongWayWade wrote:
> the manufacturer recommends premium > A salesman told me I could use regular Wow. That's a tough one. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Premium fuel - production car - required?
WrongWayWade > wrote:
>I'm considering buying a car where the manufacturer recommends premium >fuel. The car has an 11:1 compression ratio. A salesman told me I could >use regular gas without a problem; I would just sacrifice a small part of >the full horsepower potential of the car. But it wouldn't ping or cause >any other problems. Depends what the car was. Most modern cars have detonation sensors that will retard the timing if the engine starts to ping, and stop the pinging. The thing is, running that way, although you won't damage the engine, you also will lose a lot of power. So you're paying for a high compression high performance engine and not getting the performance you paid for. >Was the salesman just trying to make a sale? I thought if you don't use >premium when you're supposed to, you get pre-ignition/pinging which is NOT >good for the engine. In the days before electronic ignition controls, that was the case. It was a very quick way to destroy your engine. Today, we have controls to keep you from destroying the engine. But, that doesn't mean using them is a good idea. And, if the car you're looking at buying is an Mustang with points and plugs, then by all means be careful to prevent pinging. >Where I live the octane of the gas is 87 regualar, 89 silver, 93 premium. >(Using the mid-grade was also something I was considering). > >Any comments? What does the owner's manual say? If the owner's manual says to use 93, use 93. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Premium fuel - production car - required?
On 4/9/2014 7:36 AM, WrongWayWade wrote:
> I'm considering buying a car where the manufacturer recommends premium > fuel. The car has an 11:1 compression ratio. A salesman told me I could > use regular gas without a problem; I would just sacrifice a small part of > the full horsepower potential of the car. But it wouldn't ping or cause > any other problems. > > Was the salesman just trying to make a sale? I thought if you don't use > premium when you're supposed to, you get pre-ignition/pinging which is NOT > good for the engine. > > Where I live the octane of the gas is 87 regualar, 89 silver, 93 premium. > (Using the mid-grade was also something I was considering). > > Any comments? Difficult question. I would research this thoroughly for the specific engine you're considering. Every platform has experienced experts, find one for this car first. I have used products like this: http://www.caltex.com.au/PRODUCTSAND...n.aspx?ID=1829 in a race environment but they're impractical for street use, expensive, and limited in that you just will not get to the old 110 Premium octane level with modern consumer fuel using additives. Unless you have a personal connection at a nearby airport, avgas is also impractical. I have also added head height with different pistons to get lower compression but that is involved and may obviate the car's innate appeal, right? -- Andrew Muzi <www.yellowjersey.org/> Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Premium fuel - production car - required?
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 2:36:52 AM UTC-10, WrongWayWade wrote:
> I'm considering buying a car where the manufacturer recommends premium > > fuel. The car has an 11:1 compression ratio. A salesman told me I could > > use regular gas without a problem; I would just sacrifice a small part of > > the full horsepower potential of the car. But it wouldn't ping or cause > > any other problems. > > > > Was the salesman just trying to make a sale? I thought if you don't use > > premium when you're supposed to, you get pre-ignition/pinging which is NOT > > good for the engine. > > > > Where I live the octane of the gas is 87 regualar, 89 silver, 93 premium. > > (Using the mid-grade was also something I was considering). > > > > Any comments? It's probably not a good idea to put much faith in what a salesguy says. Chances are they're giving you a standard response to your question. Mostly, you have to experiment with the car in question. If you're not sensitive to engine knock, don't try it cause it's not good to run and engine under such conditions. OTOH, back in the 70s/80s light engine knock was supposed to be acceptable. My experience has been that the ethanol blends will allow you to use one grade lower grade gas just fine. I used to run my Hyundai Sonata V6 on regular grade gas and that had a lot of get up and go. Possibly, it would have had even more power with premium but I'm a cheap kind of guy and not all that power hungry. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Premium fuel - production car - required?
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:36:52 -0400, WrongWayWade >
wrote: >I'm considering buying a car where the manufacturer recommends premium >fuel. The car has an 11:1 compression ratio. A salesman told me I could >use regular gas without a problem; I would just sacrifice a small part of >the full horsepower potential of the car. But it wouldn't ping or cause >any other problems. > >Was the salesman just trying to make a sale? I thought if you don't use >premium when you're supposed to, you get pre-ignition/pinging which is NOT >good for the engine. > >Where I live the octane of the gas is 87 regualar, 89 silver, 93 premium. >(Using the mid-grade was also something I was considering). > >Any comments? > > A lot of new cars these days come with an owners manual. You might look in the glove box for one. It will tell you in there whether you MUST burn premium or not. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Premium fuel - production car - required?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Premium fuel - production car - required?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Premium fuel - production car - required?
On Monday, April 14, 2014 4:50:39 AM UTC-10, Bluto wrote:
> "WrongWayWade" wrote in message > > t... > > > > In article >, > > says... > > > > > >On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:36:52 -0400, WrongWayWade > > > >wrote: > > > > > >>I'm considering buying a car where the manufacturer recommends premium > > >>fuel. The car has an 11:1 compression ratio. A salesman told me I could > > >>use regular gas without a problem; I would just sacrifice a small part of > > >>the full horsepower potential of the car. But it wouldn't ping or cause > > >>any other problems. > > >> > > >>Was the salesman just trying to make a sale? I thought if you don't use > > >>premium when you're supposed to, you get pre-ignition/pinging which is NOT > > >>good for the engine. > > >> > > >>Where I live the octane of the gas is 87 regualar, 89 silver, 93 premium. > > >>(Using the mid-grade was also something I was considering). > > >> > > >>Any comments? > > >> > > >> > > > > > >A lot of new cars these days come with an owners manual. You might > > >look in the glove box for one. It will tell you in there whether you > > >MUST burn premium or not. > > > > Unsure how the smarminess is necessary here. Notice I said I was > > CONSIDERING a new car (i.e. no access to the glove compartment or owner's > > manual) and that I already KNOW the manufacturer recommends premium fuel. > > That wasn't the question. Thanks to the people that actually had answers.. > > > > You came to a newsgroup for answers, did you ever try the > > manufacturers website? My owners manual and maintenance schedules are > > available online and the site has FAQ and blogs for added information. The manufacturer's website and the manual will give the standard stock answer. My experience is that you have some leeway and you just have to test each vehicle to get the real, correct, answer. There's a lot of times where I like to ignore the manufacturer's stock answer. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reg versus Premium Fuel experiament in 09 PT Cruiser | Ashton Crusher[_2_] | Driving | 136 | November 23rd 09 01:54 PM |
Reg versus Premium Fuel experiament in 09 PT Cruiser | Steve[_1_] | Technology | 1 | November 11th 09 06:04 PM |
Reg versus Premium Fuel experiament in 09 PT Cruiser | Steve[_1_] | Technology | 0 | November 11th 09 04:10 PM |
Reg versus Premium Fuel experiament in 09 PT Cruiser | Steve[_1_] | Technology | 0 | November 11th 09 04:04 PM |
Premium Fuel? | [email protected] | Mazda | 21 | March 30th 06 11:14 AM |