If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Poor gas mileage (2005 Honda Civic LX AT) ~25 MPG
According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the
highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive additional 25/30 miles). Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway. According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25. This average is even worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers? Are they accurate when driving 55/65? Can't test that myself since I don't have a patience to drive that slow. This is a new car - I've just bought it (I put almost 3k MI already). Thanks. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article . com>,
Jerzy > wrote: >According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the >highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light >comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive >additional 25/30 miles). Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway. >According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me >about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25. Instead of assuming how much fuel is in the fuel tank when the light turns on, go to the fuel station and refuel until the fuel tank is full. Note the amount of fuel used in refueling and divide that number into the number of miles since you last filled the fuel tank to full. That will give you a more accurate estimate. >Can the >fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If >there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is >probably around 75 mph). On the highway, aerodynamic drag increases greatly as you increase speed. That can greatly worsen fuel economy. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Timothy J. Lee Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome. No warranty of any kind is provided with this message. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
>That will give you a more accurate estimate.
OK. Sounds like a good idea. Thanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
keep an excel spreadsheet with date, mileage, fuel, price, mileage (per
tank), average mileage (last 5 tanks or so, up to you) and also MAINTENANCE recoards: new tires, new plugs, new brake pads, whatever, so that you know is something goes wrong. also note driving conditions: summer, highway, empty car, or winter, hilly, 4 people in the car and the trunck loaded with sports equipment. That also affects the mileage a lot! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Jerzy wrote:
> According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the > highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light > comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive > additional 25/30 miles). which means basically... nothing. it might, might not. its basically a "second warning" > Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway. > According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me > about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25. This average is even set trip odo to 0 fill tank drive until you feel the tank should be refilled refill tank until pump clicks divide number on trip odometer by number of gallons used to refill *thats* your true MPG IOW... dont go by the tank specs and what youre guessing the reserve should be... use REAL FIGURES. > worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the > fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If > there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is > probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers? they pretty much dont apply for 90mph driving. in fact, they only apply if you do the same test cycle the EPA uses. you should get around 29 in mixed driving. if youre doing 90mph, then 25 is a reasonable number. > Are they accurate when driving 55/65? Can't test that myself since I > don't have a patience to drive that slow. This is a new car - I've just > bought it (I put almost 3k MI already). Thanks. it should loosen up more in another 5k miles. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
SoCalMike > wrote:
>Jerzy wrote: >> worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the >> fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If >> there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is >> probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers? > >they pretty much dont apply for 90mph driving. in fact, they only apply >if you do the same test cycle the EPA uses. you should get around 29 in >mixed driving. if youre doing 90mph, then 25 is a reasonable number. The EPA test for highway mileage is to run the car on friction rollers at a constant 48 mph. Running down the road at 80-90 mph should give you about 30 mpg, more or less, depending on the direction and speed of the wind and the severity of the hills. (No road is absolutely flat.) One time I was driving my '98 Civic EX coupe from Flagstaff, AZ to Amarillo, TX on I-40 at a constant 85 mph indicated. I got 42 mpg over 411 miles. I also had a constant 40 mph tail wind. It makes a huge difference. Andy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Jerzy wrote: > > According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the > highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light > comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive > additional 25/30 miles). Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway. > According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me > about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25. This average is even > worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the > fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If > there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is > probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers? > Are they accurate when driving 55/65? Can't test that myself since I > don't have a patience to drive that slow. This is a new car - I've just > bought it (I put almost 3k MI already). Thanks. I get 34 mpg @ 80+ on my 96 Civic Coupe. ;-) -- Why Bill Gates is a crimimal. Microsoft helps China to censor bloggers Jonathan Watts in Beijing Wednesday June 15, 2005 The Guardian Civil liberties groups have condemned an arrangement between Microsoft and Chinese authorities to censor the internet. The American company is helping censors remove "freedom" and "democracy" from the net in China with a software package that prevents bloggers from using these and other politically sensitive words on their websites. The restrictions, which also include an automated denial of "human rights", are built into MSN Spaces, a blog service launched in China last month by Shanghai MSN Network Communications Technology, a venture in which Microsoft holds a 50% stake. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Just a point of reference: I have a 2003 Honda Civic EX,and I routinely
do 80mph on the interstate.I get 29mpg when going that fast.I tend to get better mileage when approaching lower speeds (like 55-60mph) when going on state roads with lower speed limits.I think this is a general observation in any engine no matter what year or engine in the vehicle.The faster you go,the more the fuel efficiency decreases. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Jerzy wrote:
> According to spec the gas consumption is 29 in the city and 38 on the > highway. However, I can drive about 300 MI before the "low fuel" light > comes up (which according to the manual would allow me to drive > additional 25/30 miles). Most of the time (90%) I drive on a highway. > According to the spec the tank size is 13.2 gallons, which gives me > about 25 MPG: 300 + (30 reserve) / 13.2 = 25. This average is even > worst than officially published 29 MPG in the city. What gives? Can the > fuel efficiency drop drastically to this level because of my speed? If > there is no traffic I tend to drive at 80-90 mph (the average is > probably around 75 mph). How good are these advertised 29/38 numbers? > Are they accurate when driving 55/65? Can't test that myself since I > don't have a patience to drive that slow. This is a new car - I've just > bought it (I put almost 3k MI already). Thanks. My son's '05 Civic Coupe (A/T) consistently gets 25 MPG, strictly in town (greater Los Angeles area) driving. When the car does see the freeway (such as it is around here) the F.E. can get close to 30 MPG You can read about EPA ESTIMATES on their web site, but here is Honda's version: Tech Line fields many questions on fuel economy, including why some vehicles don't get the fuel mileage estimates shown on the fuel economy label (part of the Monroney label that's on every new car and truck). Before you read this Q & A, here's a sample label with an explanation of its contents. Question: Why can't I get the City and Highway mpg estimates shown on the label? Answer: The mileage estimates on the label reflect the average mpg attained by similar vehicles in a model line under controlled laboratory conditions and are not the result of an actual road test. And remember, as stated on the fuel economy label: "Actual mileage will vary with options, driving conditions, driving habits, and vehicle's condition." Question: Just how are the EPA mileage estimates made anyway? Answer: Test vehicles are run by professional drivers on a treadmill-like device that easures exhaust emissions and fuel usage. During the test, the vehicle's headlights, A/C, heater, audio unit, and all accessories are turned off. Upshifts on M/T vehicles are typically made at 15 mph (1st to 2nd gear), 28 mph (2nd to 3rd gear), 41 mph (3rd to 4th gear), and 52 mph (4th to 5th gear). The City portion of the test simulates a 7.5 mile stop-and-go trip with an average speed of 20 mph. The trip takes 23 minutes, has 18 stops, and keeps the engine idling about 18 percent of the time to simulate rush hour traffic delays. The Highway portion of the test simulates a 10-mile drive with speeds averaging 48 mph. It's run from a hot start in a mix of rural and interstate driving conditions. There are no stops, and there's not much idling time. When both test results are known, the City mpg is lowered by 10 percent, and the Highway mpg is lowered by 22 percent; this makes the results closer to real worldls fuel consumption. Question: How do I calculate mpg? Answer: You divide the miles driven by the number of gallons of fuel that you used. Question: How can I increase my vehicle's mpg? Answer: To increase your vehicle's mpg, do this: .. As often as possible, accelerate slowly and smoothly, keep your engine speed below 3,000 rpm, and lower your road speed. .. Keep your tires inflated to the specs listed on the doorjamb sticker. .. Keep your vehicle in top condition by following the maintainance schedule listed in your owner's manual and by using the recommended engine oil. Question: Where can I get more info on fuel economy? Answer: You can get a free copy of the Model Year 2001 Fuel Economy Guide by any of these means: Mail: National Alternative Fuels Hotline 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031-1207 Phone: 800-423-1363 Internet: www.fueleconomy.gov -- Tp, -------- __o ----- -\<. -------- __o --- ( )/ ( ) ---- -\<. -------------------- ( )/ ( ) ----------------------------------------- No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2005 Honda Civic LX | rd_dog | Honda | 5 | April 5th 05 05:52 AM |
2005 Civic SI (Cdn) | alyhirji | Honda | 3 | April 2nd 05 04:24 AM |
Honda Civic question | Subhabrata Bhattacharyya | Honda | 11 | March 19th 05 06:01 PM |
Honda Civic Sedan 2001 Service Manual | Christian | Technology | 0 | March 5th 05 04:25 PM |
Buying 2005 Honda Accord EX V6 Sedan - Invoice price good? | John W | Honda | 6 | January 17th 05 03:25 PM |