If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#241
|
|||
|
|||
yes, Dori, there are at least two male posting police, but they are just
going to have to get used to the fact that i am going to do whatever i feel like at the time..sometimes i obey, sometimes i don't.... typical of us females, huh???? and men too...:-) Dori A Schmetterling wrote: > So do I, and the Posting Police has been after me, too... > > There are one or two male ranters here, too, don't you think? > > DAS |
Ads |
#242
|
|||
|
|||
take care of yourself Matt, let me do my research, and don't call me a
liberal, i even prefer "typical stupid ****" over liberal anyday!...ok??? Matt Whiting wrote: > linda wrote: > >> matt, yes, i can read back and forth, up and down, and most of the >> time i can and am allowed to read the ending of a book first. and if >> you knew what you wrote to begin with then a reply at the top would >> make sense, however, i will try to comply with everyones wwishes. and >> Chrysler is aware of the airbag propellant problem, just ask Deadbeat, >> he works there.. he won't tell you the truth.. i am not an ACTIVIST, i >> am a researcher trying to better your planet.. (which one was it anyway?) > > > No, you are someone who has too much time on their hands and thus looks > for trouble. And, I'm quite willing to look out for myself. Why do you > liberals feel compelled to "help" those of us who are more than willing > to take responsibility for ourselves? > > > Matt > |
#243
|
|||
|
|||
take care of yourself Matt, let me do my research, and don't call me a
liberal, i even prefer "typical stupid ****" over liberal anyday!...ok??? Matt Whiting wrote: > linda wrote: > >> matt, yes, i can read back and forth, up and down, and most of the >> time i can and am allowed to read the ending of a book first. and if >> you knew what you wrote to begin with then a reply at the top would >> make sense, however, i will try to comply with everyones wwishes. and >> Chrysler is aware of the airbag propellant problem, just ask Deadbeat, >> he works there.. he won't tell you the truth.. i am not an ACTIVIST, i >> am a researcher trying to better your planet.. (which one was it anyway?) > > > No, you are someone who has too much time on their hands and thus looks > for trouble. And, I'm quite willing to look out for myself. Why do you > liberals feel compelled to "help" those of us who are more than willing > to take responsibility for ourselves? > > > Matt > |
#244
|
|||
|
|||
Ted, Ted, Ted.... what can i say...
lw Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > "Matt Whiting" > wrote in message > ... > > >>>he works there.. he won't tell you the truth.. i am not an ACTIVIST, i >>>am a researcher trying to better your planet.. (which one was it > > anyway?) > >>No, you are someone who has too much time on their hands and thus looks >>for trouble. And, I'm quite willing to look out for myself. Why do you >>liberals feel compelled to "help" those of us who are more than willing >>to take responsibility for ourselves? >> > > > Matt, don't class her in with us. She isn't a liberal. She's an > ultraliberal which > is as bad as an ultraconservative. > > Ted > > |
#245
|
|||
|
|||
Ted, Ted, Ted.... what can i say...
lw Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > "Matt Whiting" > wrote in message > ... > > >>>he works there.. he won't tell you the truth.. i am not an ACTIVIST, i >>>am a researcher trying to better your planet.. (which one was it > > anyway?) > >>No, you are someone who has too much time on their hands and thus looks >>for trouble. And, I'm quite willing to look out for myself. Why do you >>liberals feel compelled to "help" those of us who are more than willing >>to take responsibility for ourselves? >> > > > Matt, don't class her in with us. She isn't a liberal. She's an > ultraliberal which > is as bad as an ultraconservative. > > Ted > > |
#246
|
|||
|
|||
you read this one, didn't you??
Matt Whiting wrote: > linda wrote: > >> did you read your email first so that you could remember what you said >> to me, so that my response would make sense? > > > I don't read unsolicited or unexpected email. > > > Matt > |
#247
|
|||
|
|||
you read this one, didn't you??
Matt Whiting wrote: > linda wrote: > >> did you read your email first so that you could remember what you said >> to me, so that my response would make sense? > > > I don't read unsolicited or unexpected email. > > > Matt > |
#248
|
|||
|
|||
Dan, my favorite safety device used to be lying in my mothers protective
arms... i miss that... lw Dan Gates wrote: > Daniel J. Stern wrote: > >> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, linda wrote: >> >> >>> Bill Putney wrote: >> >> >> >>>> a few posts back it looked like you were coming on to Daniel Stern. >> >> >> >>> i do not know Daniel Stern.. i am in a happy contented relationship that >>> is very rewarding. p.s. Daniel, if i were trying to come on to you, >>> believeme, you and everyone here would know it...:-) >> >> >> >> *ROFL* >> >> Oh, man. this is too, too funny on so many different levels that I'm not >> even sure where to begin. It's Usenet Kabuki Theatre at its finest. Linda >> has just learnt about airbag propellants and usenet, combines the two and >> makes her first posts. Daniel responds to Linda with info. Bill uses the >> old DHMO gag on Linda, who swallows it. Linda's never heard of Daniel >> before, but picks up on Daniel's mention of headlamps and -- having just >> learnt about Usenet -- offers her assistance with headlamp research. >> Daniel politely declines Linda's offer, but Bill sees it as Linda coming >> on to Daniel. Daniel doesn't see it as a come-on, because Daniel's a >> member of the Homosexual Menace To Society who, in his committed >> relationship with his other half of more than four years, works busily on >> a daily basis to tear up the social fabric in accordance with Bill's >> politics. Meanwhile, back on Usenet, Linda's amused and a little >> embarrassed by Bill's perception, and takes great (but, as it turns out, >> unnecessary) pains to assure Daniel she wasn't coming on to him. Daniel >> chortles and wonders why everything's always about sex with heterosexuals >> like Bill. >> >> This episode of Usenet Kabuki was brought to you by your Plymouth-DeSoto >> dealer, the number "3" and the letter "Q". Tune in next week for another >> exciting episode! >> >> -DS >> > > > My God Daniel!! No one will ever respond to one of your posts again! It > may "TURN" us too, with your wicked ways. Just corresponding will make > us make irrational choices! |>))))))) > > This has been good amusement though. > > I still think that properly implemented air-bag system, just like > properly implemented DRLs, save lives. No question that a lap/shoulder > belt that is actually buckled and adjusted does the first part of the job. > > My favourite "safety" devices were the "passive" belt systems that GM > and Ford used. The belts attached to the door for GM that got in the > way every time you tried to get into or out of the car, but still had > the standard buckle system so that you could override it if you didn't > want to wear them. And the Ford motorized shoulder belt that still > required you to reach down and buckle the lap belt or decapitate yourself! > > Priceless! > > Dan |
#249
|
|||
|
|||
Dan, my favorite safety device used to be lying in my mothers protective
arms... i miss that... lw Dan Gates wrote: > Daniel J. Stern wrote: > >> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, linda wrote: >> >> >>> Bill Putney wrote: >> >> >> >>>> a few posts back it looked like you were coming on to Daniel Stern. >> >> >> >>> i do not know Daniel Stern.. i am in a happy contented relationship that >>> is very rewarding. p.s. Daniel, if i were trying to come on to you, >>> believeme, you and everyone here would know it...:-) >> >> >> >> *ROFL* >> >> Oh, man. this is too, too funny on so many different levels that I'm not >> even sure where to begin. It's Usenet Kabuki Theatre at its finest. Linda >> has just learnt about airbag propellants and usenet, combines the two and >> makes her first posts. Daniel responds to Linda with info. Bill uses the >> old DHMO gag on Linda, who swallows it. Linda's never heard of Daniel >> before, but picks up on Daniel's mention of headlamps and -- having just >> learnt about Usenet -- offers her assistance with headlamp research. >> Daniel politely declines Linda's offer, but Bill sees it as Linda coming >> on to Daniel. Daniel doesn't see it as a come-on, because Daniel's a >> member of the Homosexual Menace To Society who, in his committed >> relationship with his other half of more than four years, works busily on >> a daily basis to tear up the social fabric in accordance with Bill's >> politics. Meanwhile, back on Usenet, Linda's amused and a little >> embarrassed by Bill's perception, and takes great (but, as it turns out, >> unnecessary) pains to assure Daniel she wasn't coming on to him. Daniel >> chortles and wonders why everything's always about sex with heterosexuals >> like Bill. >> >> This episode of Usenet Kabuki was brought to you by your Plymouth-DeSoto >> dealer, the number "3" and the letter "Q". Tune in next week for another >> exciting episode! >> >> -DS >> > > > My God Daniel!! No one will ever respond to one of your posts again! It > may "TURN" us too, with your wicked ways. Just corresponding will make > us make irrational choices! |>))))))) > > This has been good amusement though. > > I still think that properly implemented air-bag system, just like > properly implemented DRLs, save lives. No question that a lap/shoulder > belt that is actually buckled and adjusted does the first part of the job. > > My favourite "safety" devices were the "passive" belt systems that GM > and Ford used. The belts attached to the door for GM that got in the > way every time you tried to get into or out of the car, but still had > the standard buckle system so that you could override it if you didn't > want to wear them. And the Ford motorized shoulder belt that still > required you to reach down and buckle the lap belt or decapitate yourself! > > Priceless! > > Dan |
#250
|
|||
|
|||
High_Density wrote:
> ***YAWN*** > > The old airbag thread again..... > > Next let us discuss the merits of Daytime Running Lights. don't know a dang thing about daytime running lights, except my son installed some on my car without my knowledge and my approval... can i remove them or is it against the law??? > > After that lets start a thread on Abortion Abortion, i think it is the woman choice.. if man were to get pregnant it would not be a factor..... it would be a RIGHT... > > Then lets do the death penalty............ yes, lets do death penalty.. i got rear ended because some do-gooders against death penalty were protesting and they guy behind me was distracted by them and did not see me stop in front of him.. and my airbags did NOT deploy and he hit me very hard... did i sue him? no, but i am thinking of suing the protesters... :-) > > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|