If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
GTR2 Rank
Alan Bernardo wrote:
> There is a difference between a typo (my spell-checker missed it) and what > the initial poster did-- using "laff" instead of "laugh". His was done on > purpose, and mine was an accident. BS, it wasn't an accident. You just didn't know how to spell striking. Putting a "c" before the "k" is no accident. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
GTR2 Rank
"Garrot" > wrote in message news:CteDg.372010$Mn5.333588@pd7tw3no... > Alan Bernardo wrote: > >> There is a difference between a typo (my spell-checker missed it) and >> what the initial poster did-- using "laff" instead of "laugh". His was >> done on purpose, and mine was an accident. > > BS, it wasn't an accident. You just didn't know how to spell striking. > Putting a "c" before the "k" is no accident. Okay. Whatever you say. I would think that I know how to spell a word that is quite elementary. You're only fooling yourself or wishing things were other than they are if you think differently. And the last book you read was-- _The Hoties of the Nascar Circuit: In Living Color_ Alanb |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
GTR2 Rank
Alan Bernardo wrote:
> "Garrot" > wrote in message > news:CteDg.372010$Mn5.333588@pd7tw3no... >> Alan Bernardo wrote: >> >>> There is a difference between a typo (my spell-checker missed it) and >>> what the initial poster did-- using "laff" instead of "laugh". His was >>> done on purpose, and mine was an accident. >> BS, it wasn't an accident. You just didn't know how to spell striking. >> Putting a "c" before the "k" is no accident. > > Okay. Whatever you say. I would think that I know how to spell a word that > is quite elementary. You're only fooling yourself or wishing things were > other than they are if you think differently. > > And the last book you read was-- _The Hoties of the Nascar Circuit: In > Living Color_ > > Alanb > > hurry up and print this out and show ur 4th grade teacher before she croaks |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
GTR2 Rank
"PlowBoy" > wrote in message news:RB5Dg.3509$uW1.381@dukeread06... > Now Alan, > > dig the hook out of 'yer' mouth. take a deep breath and let OE mark > the post as read and move on... <VBG> Life is too short.... > This whole thing was only meant to aggravate those who are forever writing stupid stuff and are too lazy to actually spell a word out, instead choosing some fashionable internet jargon nonsense. Life being actually too long, I can't let it crowd in on me by letting some kid toss me about. I will, however, be looking forward to GTR2. I use rFactor mainly for the open-wheelers, and GTR suits me fine for the other types of cars. Alanb |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
GTR2 Rank
>>
>> > hurry up and print this out and show ur 4th grade teacher before she > croaks At least you have some original thoughts lodged somewhere in your brain. I think if we continue this most engaging conversation any longer, you might prove more about yourself than you'd really want to. Bye now! Alanb |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
GTR2 Rank
Alan Bernardo wrote:
>>> >> hurry up and print this out and show ur 4th grade teacher before she >> croaks > > At least you have some original thoughts lodged somewhere in your brain. I > think if we continue this most engaging conversation any longer, you might > prove more about yourself than you'd really want to. > > Bye now! > > Alanb > > BYE |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
GTR2 Rank
Alan Bernardo wrote:
> I will, however, be looking forward to GTR2. I use rFactor mainly for the > open-wheelers, and GTR suits me fine for the other types of cars. The 1979 F1 mod demo for rFactor is looking rather good. I have been a bit disappointed with the development of rFactor, but it seems to be coming of age. I guess it does take some time to produce a top quality mod and we are starting to see them now. The sounds are fantastic. I always found the trainers to feel the best in rfactor and the winged open wheelers not so good. This mod feels just right. Very good. Cheers Tony |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
GTR2 Rank
"Tony Rickard" > wrote in message k... > Alan Bernardo wrote: > >> I will, however, be looking forward to GTR2. I use rFactor mainly for >> the open-wheelers, and GTR suits me fine for the other types of cars. > > The 1979 F1 mod demo for rFactor is looking rather good. I have been a bit > disappointed with the development of rFactor, but it seems to be coming of > age. I guess it does take some time to produce a top quality mod and we > are starting to see them now. > > The sounds are fantastic. I always found the trainers to feel the best in > rfactor and the winged open wheelers not so good. This mod feels just > right. Very good. > > Cheers > Tony I agree. The '79 F1 Mod is rather nice, even though it is but a demo. I do like it better than any of the F1 Mods currently released. Alanb |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
GTR2 Rank
Alan Bernardo wrote:
> And the last book you read was-- _The Hoties of the Nascar Circuit: In > Living Color_ > > Alanb > > Correct! But it is spelled "Hotties", two "t's", not one. Bwahahahaaa.. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
GTR2 Rank
"Garrot" > wrote in message news:jvtDg.371193$iF6.35466@pd7tw2no... > Alan Bernardo wrote: > >> And the last book you read was-- _The Hoties of the Nascar Circuit: In >> Living Color_ >> >> Alanb > > Correct! But it is spelled "Hotties", two "t's", not one. Bwahahahaaa.. You might be correct, but it was written by an idiot (or reported by one). Alanb |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will GTR2 be multithreaded? | Cris Eichler | Simulators | 4 | August 24th 06 04:25 AM |
rF Rank | Uwe Schürkamp | Simulators | 1 | December 30th 05 04:29 PM |
GTR: GT Rank | Damien Smith | Simulators | 4 | November 29th 04 12:34 PM |
GT Rank alfa test | Uwe Schürkamp | Simulators | 1 | November 14th 04 08:47 PM |