Cop charged with raping woman during traffic stop

On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 18:19:23 GMT, (Dark Magus)
wrote:

>On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:24:21 -0500, DTJ > wrote:
>
>>>So many feminists, so little cyanide...
>
>>The cure for feminism is large dicks, as dildos simply don't convince
>>them.
>
>Strapons are their favorite. That way they can **** each other.

But no matter how large the dildo, they always, always come around to
the realization that men are superior.

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:01:01 -0700, "Michael Snyder"
> wrote:

>
>"DTJ" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 17:52:35 -0700, "Michael Snyder"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > wrote in message
>> roups.com...
>> >>
>> >> Men rape to show who is in control, they rape because they are cowards.
>> >
>> >So many feminists, so little cyanide...
>>
>> The cure for feminism is large dicks, as dildos simply don't convince
>> them.
>
>The cure for feminism is reason -- but they've become immune to that.

By definition a feminist has no reasoning ability.

"Alex Rodriguez" > wrote in message
...
> In article . com>,
> says...
>>Sounds like the woman chose to provide services in exchange for
>>avoiding tickets, but then decided to pursue action against the cop for
>>whatever reason. Maybe he wrote the ticket after all. Who knows...
>
> sounds plausible. Either way, what the cop did is illegal, even if the
> woman was a willing participant.
> -------------
> Alex
>

Yep, you hit the nail on the head. If he was dumb enough to do either (rape
or let someone go in exchange for sex) then he should be charged and fired.
This is another reason why I love video systems in patrol cars.

--
It is pretty hard to talk about responsibility unless you have exercised it
yourself. -- Bill Clinton, 1987



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"John Smith" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Alex Rodriguez" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article . com>,
> > says...
> >>Sounds like the woman chose to provide services in exchange for
> >>avoiding tickets, but then decided to pursue action against the cop for
> >>whatever reason. Maybe he wrote the ticket after all. Who knows...
> >
> > sounds plausible. Either way, what the cop did is illegal, even if the
> > woman was a willing participant.
> > -------------
> > Alex
> >
>
> Yep, you hit the nail on the head. If he was dumb enough to do either
(rape
> or let someone go in exchange for sex) then he should be charged and
fired.

That's true -- but don't you think it's rather important to determine
which one happened? Accepting sex as a bribe is a firing offense,
but it's not a 20-to-life offense. Violent rape is.

"Michael Snyder" > wrote in message
...
>
> "John Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Alex Rodriguez" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article . com>,
>> > says...
>> >>Sounds like the woman chose to provide services in exchange for
>> >>avoiding tickets, but then decided to pursue action against the cop for
>> >>whatever reason. Maybe he wrote the ticket after all. Who knows...
>> >
>> > sounds plausible. Either way, what the cop did is illegal, even if the
>> > woman was a willing participant.
>> > -------------
>> > Alex
>> >
>>
>> Yep, you hit the nail on the head. If he was dumb enough to do either
> (rape
>> or let someone go in exchange for sex) then he should be charged and
> fired.
>
> That's true -- but don't you think it's rather important to determine
> which one happened? Accepting sex as a bribe is a firing offense,
> but it's not a 20-to-life offense. Violent rape is.
>
>


Oh yes, very important - but if it is a "he said - she said", no one will
ever know the truth except the cop and the woman. The cop is screwed either
way. At a jail near here we had an incident where a male jailer transferred
a female prisoner from one cell to another (one cell block to another). He
violated procedure because it requires 2 jailers when moving a female. The
next day, the female inmate accused the jailer of rape and gave a vivid,
detailed account of the rape - on tape. What she didn't know was that there
were cameras along all the hallways that were used in the transfer, and the
video showed that nothing happened. The jailer was still fired for
violating the rules, but she had several new charges brought against her.


--
It is pretty hard to talk about responsibility unless you have exercised it
yourself. -- Bill Clinton, 1987



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"John Smith" > wrote in message
...
> "Michael Snyder" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "John Smith" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >>
> >> "Alex Rodriguez" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > In article . com>,
> >> > says...
> >> >>Sounds like the woman chose to provide services in exchange for
> >> >>avoiding tickets, but then decided to pursue action against the cop
for
> >> >>whatever reason. Maybe he wrote the ticket after all. Who knows...
> >> >
> >> > sounds plausible. Either way, what the cop did is illegal, even if
the
> >> > woman was a willing participant.
> >> > -------------
> >> > Alex
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yep, you hit the nail on the head. If he was dumb enough to do either
> > (rape
> >> or let someone go in exchange for sex) then he should be charged and
> > fired.
> >
> > That's true -- but don't you think it's rather important to determine
> > which one happened? Accepting sex as a bribe is a firing offense,
> > but it's not a 20-to-life offense. Violent rape is.
> >
> >
>
>
> Oh yes, very important - but if it is a "he said - she said", no one will
> ever know the truth except the cop and the woman. The cop is screwed
either
> way. At a jail near here we had an incident where a male jailer
transferred
> a female prisoner from one cell to another (one cell block to another).
He
> violated procedure because it requires 2 jailers when moving a female.
The
> next day, the female inmate accused the jailer of rape and gave a vivid,
> detailed account of the rape - on tape. What she didn't know was that
there
> were cameras along all the hallways that were used in the transfer, and
the
> video showed that nothing happened. The jailer was still fired for
> violating the rules, but she had several new charges brought against her.

Nice. But if it is a "he said - she said", then the lack of any other
supporting evidence should cause us to lean toward acquittal.
If one is innocent until proven guilty, then the unsupported testimony
of a single witness should never be taken as proof.