If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Paul. > wrote in
th.net: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:12:53 -0400, Alex Rodriguez , said the > following in rec.autos.driving... > > >> >> I wonder if it was the same idiots for the dog sniffing who voted for >> the seizure of property? > > Probablly. Those 9 senile old idiots have been there for quite a > while. > Uh,the vote was 5-4,not unanimous. It appears that at least 4 USSC Justices still obey the Constitution. This is what the US People get for electing socialist Presidents who select socialist USSC "Justices". -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Yanik wrote:
> Paul. > wrote in > th.net: > > >>On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:12:53 -0400, Alex Rodriguez , said the >>following in rec.autos.driving... >> >> >> >>>I wonder if it was the same idiots for the dog sniffing who voted for >>>the seizure of property? >> >>Probablly. Those 9 senile old idiots have been there for quite a >>while. >> > > > Uh,the vote was 5-4,not unanimous. > It appears that at least 4 USSC Justices still obey the Constitution. > > This is what the US People get for electing socialist Presidents who select > socialist USSC "Justices". > Oh please. It's not so much that I disagree with your point, but can you honestly say with a straight face that either side is worse than the other when it comes to appointing blatantly biased and/or obviously unsuitable people to various positions? The current administration is notable by its adherence to that trend. Or are you calling the Bush administration "socialist?" nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Yanik wrote: > > This is what the US People get for electing socialist Presidents who select > socialist USSC "Justices". > Yeah - John Paul Stevens, that noted leftist (laff) was appointed by another notorious leftist. Gerald Ford. Anthony Kennedy? Yup, a Republican appointed by Reagan. Hey, even David Souter is a Republican. Appointed by Bush I. Better luck next time, doofus. E.P. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Nate Nagel wrote: > > > Oh please. > > It's not so much that I disagree with your point, but can you honestly > say with a straight face that either side is worse than the other when > it comes to appointing blatantly biased and/or obviously unsuitable > people to various positions? The current administration is notable by > its adherence to that trend. Or are you calling the Bush administration > "socialist?" > > nate > Of course not. Since Dubya is one of "Jim's guys", everything *he* does is golden. It's those *other guys* that are the problem. Now, mind you, someone with the opposite bent would say the exact opposite. Neither recognizes the blatant, idiotic hypocrisy of it. E.P. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Nate Nagel > wrote in
news:1119664765.ee5ba4c49269e80fbc3089e16c4bd584@t eranews: > Jim Yanik wrote: >> Paul. > wrote in >> th.net: >> >> >>>On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:12:53 -0400, Alex Rodriguez , said the >>>following in rec.autos.driving... >>> >>> >>> >>>>I wonder if it was the same idiots for the dog sniffing who voted >>>>for the seizure of property? >>> >>>Probablly. Those 9 senile old idiots have been there for quite a >>>while. >>> >> >> >> Uh,the vote was 5-4,not unanimous. >> It appears that at least 4 USSC Justices still obey the Constitution. >> >> This is what the US People get for electing socialist Presidents who >> select socialist USSC "Justices". >> > > Oh please. > > It's not so much that I disagree with your point, but can you honestly > say with a straight face that either side is worse than the other when > it comes to appointing blatantly biased and/or obviously unsuitable > people to various positions? The current administration is notable by > its adherence to that trend. Or are you calling the Bush > administration "socialist?" > > nate > Just look at the DemocRATs;they are rabid socialists. Dean,their chosen leader,is assuredly rabid. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Yanik" .> wrote in message .. . > Just look at the DemocRATs;they are rabid socialists. > Dean,their chosen leader,is assuredly rabid. > You can not even spell the party name without making it a smear, yet you call others "rabid"? Funny, that. Bernard |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:52:31 -0700, "Bernard Farquart"
> wrote: >> Just look at the DemocRATs;they are rabid socialists. >> Dean,their chosen leader,is assuredly rabid. >> >You can not even spell the party name without making it a smear, >yet you call others "rabid"? > >Funny, that. While I see your point, sometimes people get so upset over the radicals in the other party that they stoop to the same low level that the radicals do. I hate liberalism. I know a lot of democrats I like and respect. There are republicans I disapprove of also. We all know I can respond like that, even though I respect opinions I disagree with, simply by allowing said radical to incite me. The fact is that anyone who wants to look at the situation objectively will know which party is better, or less evil. The ones who can't see that are not going to listen to reason. Those who can see that won't change their minds easily, because they have seen the facts. Interestingly enough, those people who can see, make up a decent portion of both parties. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"DTJ" > wrote in message news > The fact is that anyone who wants to look at the situation objectively > will know which party is better, or less evil. The ones who can't see > that are not going to listen to reason. Those who can see that won't > change their minds easily, because they have seen the facts. > Interestingly enough, those people who can see, make up a decent > portion of both parties. It is possible for two people to come to different conclusions using the same facts. I just feel that posters who use "democRATS" are about as resonable as those who use "REPUGS" |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
DTJ wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:52:31 -0700, "Bernard Farquart" > > wrote: > > >> Just look at the DemocRATs;they are rabid socialists. > >> Dean,their chosen leader,is assuredly rabid. > >> > >You can not even spell the party name without making it a smear, > >yet you call others "rabid"? > > > >Funny, that. > > While I see your point, sometimes people get so upset over the > radicals in the other party that they stoop to the same low level that > the radicals do. That does not make it acceptable. It's an excuse - a way to avoid being responsible for one's actions. > I hate liberalism. All that means is that you *hate.* Nothing more. If liberalism were everything ascribed to it by it's enemies, then it would have seen the dustbin of history long ago. Yet radical ideas find slow acceptance, and soon enough, the Earth is no longer the center of the universe, men no longer own other men in a free society, and people of color may vote. > I know a lot of democrats I like and respect. "Some of my best friends are black." > The fact is that anyone who wants to look at the situation objectively > will know which party is better, or less evil. Except that's just your bias. We know which one *you* think is less evil - but that doesn't mean you arrived at that conclusion using pure logic. Other reasonable people come to just the opposite conclusion. But in your mind, they serve evil, while you serve good. That's just plain bigotry, and has nothing to do with logic or reason. E.P. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
This ruling is crazy! I had no idea about the details until now...
I think they should enact a law saying any property taken for any use must stay owned by the govt for at least 10 years. That way shady people can't get cheap land from the govt very fast at least. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Connecticut Supreme Court hits car rental company for GPS spying | L Sternn | Driving | 1 | May 2nd 05 10:09 PM |
YOU CAN'T DRIVE TOO SLOW | Laura Bush murdered her boy friend | Driving | 93 | April 21st 05 10:34 AM |
NYT: If You Think You've Heard It All, Take a Left and HitTraffic Court | Biwah | Driving | 0 | February 23rd 05 09:56 AM |
A-holes over at Philadephia traffic court jerking me around... | Cory Dunkle | Driving | 20 | December 30th 04 11:30 PM |
Supreme Court Limits Damages to $1,000 for Misleading Loans | MrPepper11 | General | 14 | December 4th 04 06:21 PM |