If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, WindsorFox[SS] wrote:
> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. And this proves...what, now? DS |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, WindsorFox[SS] wrote:
> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. And this proves...what, now? DS |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
You're damned right I do. And I would if I could.
Kevin DeAngelis wrote: > Well, you have the right handle, I'll say that! Some folks could sure stand > to smoke a little of the wacky tabacky.... > > > "Wound Up" > wrote in message > ... > >>Maybe it's because you're making simplistic, broad-brushed attributions >>based on half-assed conjecture instead of anything substantial. Or maybe >>you're right, those who drive "peopleskars" are just more erudite, >>intelligent, and naturally more tolerant of humanity. >> >>Those "people", by the way, didn't include gays. Or blacks, Jews, gypsys, >>etc. etc. They were to be gassed, burned or shot. Those "people" >>included nazis, their subjects, and their sympathizers, only. >> >>So what's your point again? You smoked too much pot back in the day to >>make any sense now? >> >>Kevin DeAngelis wrote: >> >>>The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw >>>newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He >>>(or she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and >>>there have been no replies. >>> >>>I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than >>>Volkswagen drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still >>>do) drive VW microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they >>>could eloquently describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the >>>days.... >>> >>> >>>"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message ngin.umich.edu... >>> >>> >>>>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>>>>hate. >>>>>> >>>>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States >>>>>>of Mairca). >>>>> >>>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>>>>target of hatred >>>> >>>>Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view. >>> >>> >>> > > |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
You're damned right I do. And I would if I could.
Kevin DeAngelis wrote: > Well, you have the right handle, I'll say that! Some folks could sure stand > to smoke a little of the wacky tabacky.... > > > "Wound Up" > wrote in message > ... > >>Maybe it's because you're making simplistic, broad-brushed attributions >>based on half-assed conjecture instead of anything substantial. Or maybe >>you're right, those who drive "peopleskars" are just more erudite, >>intelligent, and naturally more tolerant of humanity. >> >>Those "people", by the way, didn't include gays. Or blacks, Jews, gypsys, >>etc. etc. They were to be gassed, burned or shot. Those "people" >>included nazis, their subjects, and their sympathizers, only. >> >>So what's your point again? You smoked too much pot back in the day to >>make any sense now? >> >>Kevin DeAngelis wrote: >> >>>The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw >>>newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He >>>(or she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and >>>there have been no replies. >>> >>>I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than >>>Volkswagen drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still >>>do) drive VW microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they >>>could eloquently describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the >>>days.... >>> >>> >>>"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message ngin.umich.edu... >>> >>> >>>>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>>>>hate. >>>>>> >>>>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States >>>>>>of Mairca). >>>>> >>>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>>>>target of hatred >>>> >>>>Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view. >>> >>> >>> > > |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message n.umich.edu... > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, WindsorFox[SS] wrote: > >> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. > > And this proves...what, now? > > DS That gays can be just as illogical as straights of course. Peter |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message n.umich.edu... > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, WindsorFox[SS] wrote: > >> Shut up Daniel, I know a number of gays that supported Bush. > > And this proves...what, now? > > DS That gays can be just as illogical as straights of course. Peter |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Wound Up wrote:
> indago wrote: > >> 041108 2142 - Wound Up posted: >> >> >>> Daniel J. Stern wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >>>> >>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>> hate. >>>> >>>> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd >>>> States of >>>> Mairca). >>> >>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>> target of hatred >> >> Well, then, maybe derision??? > > That's up to you. I can write derisive hatred very well. I choose not > to, because I don't think it's deserved, warranted, or appropriate. > > I will never understand it, but I know it's not a question of some "vile > lifestyle choice". Believe me, the gay friends I've had all said "it > would have been much easier to grow up, and know you were straight". > Want to throw an insult at me? Well, I grew up (ironic term) in a more > heterogeneous culture than a lot of people. I knew people from many > different walks of life, and had friends from many of them. I don't think "heterogeneous" means what you think it means. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Wound Up wrote:
> indago wrote: > >> 041108 2142 - Wound Up posted: >> >> >>> Daniel J. Stern wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote: >>>> >>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial >>>>> hate. >>>> >>>> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd >>>> States of >>>> Mairca). >>> >>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the >>> target of hatred >> >> Well, then, maybe derision??? > > That's up to you. I can write derisive hatred very well. I choose not > to, because I don't think it's deserved, warranted, or appropriate. > > I will never understand it, but I know it's not a question of some "vile > lifestyle choice". Believe me, the gay friends I've had all said "it > would have been much easier to grow up, and know you were straight". > Want to throw an insult at me? Well, I grew up (ironic term) in a more > heterogeneous culture than a lot of people. I knew people from many > different walks of life, and had friends from many of them. I don't think "heterogeneous" means what you think it means. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
>> That's up to you. I can write derisive hatred very well. I choose
>> not to, because I don't think it's deserved, warranted, or appropriate. >> >> I will never understand it, but I know it's not a question of some >> "vile lifestyle choice". Believe me, the gay friends I've had all >> said "it would have been much easier to grow up, and know you were >> straight". Want to throw an insult at me? Well, I grew up (ironic >> term) in a more heterogeneous culture than a lot of people. I knew >> people from many different walks of life, and had friends from many of >> them. > > > I don't think "heterogeneous" means what you think it means. I'm quite sure it does. Take a look- http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=heterogeneous |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
>> That's up to you. I can write derisive hatred very well. I choose
>> not to, because I don't think it's deserved, warranted, or appropriate. >> >> I will never understand it, but I know it's not a question of some >> "vile lifestyle choice". Believe me, the gay friends I've had all >> said "it would have been much easier to grow up, and know you were >> straight". Want to throw an insult at me? Well, I grew up (ironic >> term) in a more heterogeneous culture than a lot of people. I knew >> people from many different walks of life, and had friends from many of >> them. > > > I don't think "heterogeneous" means what you think it means. I'm quite sure it does. Take a look- http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=heterogeneous |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_gadkypy | Michael Barnes | Driving | 4 | January 4th 05 06:47 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ mixqec | [email protected] | Chrysler | 37 | November 18th 04 04:18 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ gadkypy | Paul | Antique cars | 3 | November 9th 04 06:54 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!___________ mixqec | indago | Chrysler | 7 | November 8th 04 05:05 PM |