PDA

View Full Version : Algae control: first take one shark, basically OT


kathy
March 16th 05, 12:53 AM
This is a fascinating article.

>>According to the Navy, algae and barnacles on hulls increase drag,
slowing ships and reducing fuel efficiency. Of the $550 million to $600
million the Navy spends annually on powering its ships and submarines,
at least $50 million stems directly from fouling-related increased
drag....
Sharks have placoid scales, which consist of a rectangular base
embedded in the skin with tiny spines or bristles that poke up from the
surface - the reason a shark's skin feels rough to the touch.
Brennan decided to try mimicking that surface with an artificial
coating to see if it would also have antifouling properties.

His first product: a combination plastic/rubber coating that a
microscope reveals is made of billions of tiny raised diamond-shaped
patterns. Each "sharklet" diamond measures 15 microns, or 15
thousandths of a millimeter, and contains seven raised ribs that at
close examination resemble different lengths of raised horizontal bars.
Laboratory tests show that the coating prevents a very common and
detrimental type of algae, called Ulva, from becoming established
because the algae's spores have great difficulty attaching to the
diamond-shaped configuration.<<

Entire article can be read here:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/03/050310180225.htm

Hal
March 16th 05, 03:56 PM
On 15 Mar 2005 16:53:11 -0800, "kathy" > wrote:

>Entire article can be read here:
>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/03/050310180225.htm

Thanks,

Hal

Derek Broughton
March 16th 05, 04:14 PM
kathy wrote:

> This is a fascinating article.
>
>>>According to the Navy, algae and barnacles on hulls increase drag,
> slowing ships and reducing fuel efficiency. Of the $550 million to $600
> million the Navy spends annually on powering its ships and submarines,
> at least $50 million stems directly from fouling-related increased
> drag....

It is fascinating. That figure only looks at the immediate cost of fuel.
Then there's the cost of regular dry-docking for the addition of expensive
anti-fouling paints & the completely hidden costs to the environment of the
use of anti-fouling paints. Anybody involved with sea-going vessels has
been searching for this sort of solution.
--
derek