A Fishkeeping forum. FishKeepingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishKeepingBanter.com forum » ponds » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Algae control: first take one shark, basically OT



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 16th 05, 12:53 AM
kathy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Algae control: first take one shark, basically OT

This is a fascinating article.

According to the Navy, algae and barnacles on hulls increase drag,

slowing ships and reducing fuel efficiency. Of the $550 million to $600
million the Navy spends annually on powering its ships and submarines,
at least $50 million stems directly from fouling-related increased
drag....
Sharks have placoid scales, which consist of a rectangular base
embedded in the skin with tiny spines or bristles that poke up from the
surface - the reason a shark's skin feels rough to the touch.
Brennan decided to try mimicking that surface with an artificial
coating to see if it would also have antifouling properties.

His first product: a combination plastic/rubber coating that a
microscope reveals is made of billions of tiny raised diamond-shaped
patterns. Each "sharklet" diamond measures 15 microns, or 15
thousandths of a millimeter, and contains seven raised ribs that at
close examination resemble different lengths of raised horizontal bars.
Laboratory tests show that the coating prevents a very common and
detrimental type of algae, called Ulva, from becoming established
because the algae's spores have great difficulty attaching to the
diamond-shaped configuration.

Entire article can be read he
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0310180225.htm

  #2  
Old March 16th 05, 03:56 PM
Hal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 15 Mar 2005 16:53:11 -0800, "kathy" wrote:

Entire article can be read he
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0310180225.htm


Thanks,

Hal
  #3  
Old March 16th 05, 04:14 PM
Derek Broughton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

kathy wrote:

This is a fascinating article.

According to the Navy, algae and barnacles on hulls increase drag,

slowing ships and reducing fuel efficiency. Of the $550 million to $600
million the Navy spends annually on powering its ships and submarines,
at least $50 million stems directly from fouling-related increased
drag....


It is fascinating. That figure only looks at the immediate cost of fuel.
Then there's the cost of regular dry-docking for the addition of expensive
anti-fouling paints & the completely hidden costs to the environment of the
use of anti-fouling paints. Anybody involved with sea-going vessels has
been searching for this sort of solution.
--
derek
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Algae control poll Tony Volk Plants 11 July 1st 11 07:26 PM
Green algae forming Iain Reefs 8 May 8th 04 03:35 AM
Why good plant growth= bad algae growth [email protected] Plants 2 February 22nd 04 10:45 PM
algae affected by temp? Dunter Powries Plants 23 February 13th 04 06:05 PM
getting mixed info about algae control sexandcheerios General 3 July 27th 03 04:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishKeepingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.