![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Can someone point me to a link that describes pump performance a little better? There is a chart, at the bottom of this page: http://tinyurl.com/4kxjl But, what I don't understand is, how do you determine the flow rate in GPH if when using the pump listed, the maxium HT. of a water feature can be only 2 or 3 feet? The chart says the pump can make the maximum head be 11 feet for example, with the P1600 pump at which point the flow rate would be only 220 GPH, but what if you are using a foam jet fountain, of which the maximum height can only be 3 feet or so? Does this mean, that using a nozzle that is limited to 3 feet in height is automatically consuming the pumps flow rate so that it would be the same as if an 11 foot high nozzle was being used? I'm a little confused. -- LittleScooby ------------------------------------------------------------------------ posted via www.GardenBanter.co.uk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think what your asking is "if you put the fountain on, will the pump be
maxed out" No, the pump will only pump what it can, be it a HT restriction or a fountain restriction. Your fountain fitting should have a valve to release extra water pressure. This allows you to adjust your fountain also. PLMK if this is the case. "LittleScooby" wrote in message .. . Can someone point me to a link that describes pump performance a little better? There is a chart, at the bottom of this page: http://tinyurl.com/4kxjl But, what I don't understand is, how do you determine the flow rate in GPH if when using the pump listed, the maxium HT. of a water feature can be only 2 or 3 feet? The chart says the pump can make the maximum head be 11 feet for example, with the P1600 pump at which point the flow rate would be only 220 GPH, but what if you are using a foam jet fountain, of which the maximum height can only be 3 feet or so? Does this mean, that using a nozzle that is limited to 3 feet in height is automatically consuming the pumps flow rate so that it would be the same as if an 11 foot high nozzle was being used? I'm a little confused. -- LittleScooby ------------------------------------------------------------------------ posted via www.GardenBanter.co.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pump head is the height the water is pumped to and the friction loss in
getting it there. The higher the head, the lower the flow rate. At maximum head, the flow rate should be zero, and at maximum flow, the head should be near zero. In between, the flow is reduced as shown on the chart. The foam head has some restriction that acts as friction head. As far as the height of the spray, it is a matter of the pressure behind the spray head. Think of the height of flow from an open garden hose, and the height of flow if the garden hose is put on full stream type spray, but then if the flow is restricted enough, as in mist spray, then the height is again lowered significantly. I don't know how these factors would affect your foam head. -- RichToyBox http://www.geocities.com/richtoybox/pondintro.html "LittleScooby" wrote in message .. . Can someone point me to a link that describes pump performance a little better? There is a chart, at the bottom of this page: http://tinyurl.com/4kxjl But, what I don't understand is, how do you determine the flow rate in GPH if when using the pump listed, the maxium HT. of a water feature can be only 2 or 3 feet? The chart says the pump can make the maximum head be 11 feet for example, with the P1600 pump at which point the flow rate would be only 220 GPH, but what if you are using a foam jet fountain, of which the maximum height can only be 3 feet or so? Does this mean, that using a nozzle that is limited to 3 feet in height is automatically consuming the pumps flow rate so that it would be the same as if an 11 foot high nozzle was being used? I'm a little confused. -- LittleScooby ------------------------------------------------------------------------ posted via www.GardenBanter.co.uk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So if my pump is maxed out with no restrictions, and the foam jet fountain head is only 2 feet in the air because the pump can't make the head any higher because it's running at maximum, does it mean that the pump is at closer to 0 GPH flow rate, regardless of what the chart says? Because the chart would say 2 feet of head = a much higher flow rate than if it were at 11 Feet. Because a normal fountain head could actually go up to 11 feet or whatever the chart maximum is, but foam jets only ever get to be a fraction of that height because of how they work. I guess I just need to confirm that if I have no restrictions on a pump, and it is powering a foam jet at the foam jets maximum head, does that mean the pump is very close to 0 GPH (same as if the height were closer to 11 feet of a normal fountain)? RichToyBox wrote: *Pump head is the height the water is pumped to and the friction loss in getting it there. The higher the head, the lower the flow rate. At maximum head, the flow rate should be zero, and at maximum flow, the head should be near zero. In between, the flow is reduced as shown on the chart. The foam head has some restriction that acts as friction head. As far as the height of the spray, it is a matter of the pressure behind the spray head. Think of the height of flow from an open garden hose, and the height of flow if the garden hose is put on full stream type spray, but then if the flow is restricted enough, as in mist spray, then the height is again lowered significantly. I don't know how these factors would affect your foam head. -- RichToyBox http://tinyurl.com/6k2bp "LittleScooby" wrote in message .. . Can someone point me to a link that describes pump performance a little better? There is a chart, at the bottom of this page: http://tinyurl.com/4kxjl But, what I don't understand is, how do you determine the flow rate in GPH if when using the pump listed, the maxium HT. of a water feature can be only 2 or 3 feet? The chart says the pump can make the maximum head be 11 feet for example, with the P1600 pump at which point the flow rate would be only 220 GPH, but what if you are using a foam jet fountain, of which the maximum height can only be 3 feet or so? Does this mean, that using a nozzle that is limited to 3 feet in height is automatically consuming the pumps flow rate so that it would be the same as if an 11 foot high nozzle was being used? I'm a little confused. -- LittleScooby ------------------------------------------------------------------------ posted via www.GardenBanter.co.uk * -- LittleScooby ------------------------------------------------------------------------ posted via www.GardenBanter.co.uk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LittleScooby wrote in message ...
So if my pump is maxed out with no restrictions, and the foam jet fountain head is only 2 feet in the air because the pump can't make the head any higher because it's running at maximum Your theory is pretty much right, pressure head includes the height of the plume or fountain, but may be flow losses in the head itself. The foam head can be self limiting because of two things: 1. Internal restrictions 2. External loss due to turbulent output The head has pressure loss to produce the foam effect. Therefore there is back pressure, which shows up as flow somewhere else in the system. In other words, the water comes out someplace else if it can. If it can't then the pump efficiency drops off to dump the power; it cavitates. -- Crashj |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the pump were maxed out, the flow rate would be 0 or no flow, as far as
maximum head. If you add a different pump, that has a higher flow rate, then you should expect the height of the foam jet to increase, but not necessarily double the flow rating of the pump, double the height of the foam jet. The friction in the pipes would increase very rapidly increasing the total head, and therefore, the flow rate would not be double, but would still be more than the smaller pump. If the actual flow rate doubled, then I would expect the height of the foam jet would come close to doubling. -- RichToyBox http://www.geocities.com/richtoybox/pondintro.html "LittleScooby" wrote in message .. . So if my pump is maxed out with no restrictions, and the foam jet fountain head is only 2 feet in the air because the pump can't make the head any higher because it's running at maximum, does it mean that the pump is at closer to 0 GPH flow rate, regardless of what the chart says? Because the chart would say 2 feet of head = a much higher flow rate than if it were at 11 Feet. Because a normal fountain head could actually go up to 11 feet or whatever the chart maximum is, but foam jets only ever get to be a fraction of that height because of how they work. I guess I just need to confirm that if I have no restrictions on a pump, and it is powering a foam jet at the foam jets maximum head, does that mean the pump is very close to 0 GPH (same as if the height were closer to 11 feet of a normal fountain)? RichToyBox wrote: *Pump head is the height the water is pumped to and the friction loss in getting it there. The higher the head, the lower the flow rate. At maximum head, the flow rate should be zero, and at maximum flow, the head should be near zero. In between, the flow is reduced as shown on the chart. The foam head has some restriction that acts as friction head. As far as the height of the spray, it is a matter of the pressure behind the spray head. Think of the height of flow from an open garden hose, and the height of flow if the garden hose is put on full stream type spray, but then if the flow is restricted enough, as in mist spray, then the height is again lowered significantly. I don't know how these factors would affect your foam head. -- RichToyBox http://tinyurl.com/6k2bp "LittleScooby" wrote in message .. . Can someone point me to a link that describes pump performance a little better? There is a chart, at the bottom of this page: http://tinyurl.com/4kxjl But, what I don't understand is, how do you determine the flow rate in GPH if when using the pump listed, the maxium HT. of a water feature can be only 2 or 3 feet? The chart says the pump can make the maximum head be 11 feet for example, with the P1600 pump at which point the flow rate would be only 220 GPH, but what if you are using a foam jet fountain, of which the maximum height can only be 3 feet or so? Does this mean, that using a nozzle that is limited to 3 feet in height is automatically consuming the pumps flow rate so that it would be the same as if an 11 foot high nozzle was being used? I'm a little confused. -- LittleScooby ------------------------------------------------------------------------ posted via www.GardenBanter.co.uk * -- LittleScooby ------------------------------------------------------------------------ posted via www.GardenBanter.co.uk |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks. I went to that websight but I still get lost. How about I just post the info of what I'm thinking of getting. I'm thinking of getting the Oase Aquarius 2000 pump which is rated at 2000 GPH. I'm going to be hooking it up to an Oase 1 inch Frothy fountain nozzle which supposedly has a maximum hieght of 44 inches when used with the Aquarius 2000 running at maximum. What do you think the average flow rate would be for this setup? http://tinyurl.com/5dra9 http://pondusa.com/heads2.htm bluegill phil wrote: *Here is some data. I have one of these pumps, but only for about 5 months. So far its doing good. It has a baldor motor which are good motors. Ive worked with them in manufactoring for years along with Reliance. I know of some of these motors that have been running continus duty for over 20 years http://tinyurl.com/4hle8 On 20 Jul 2004 05:39:35 -0700, (Crashj) wrote: LittleScooby wrote in message ... So if my pump is maxed out with no restrictions, and the foam jet fountain head is only 2 feet in the air because the pump can't make the head any higher because it's running at maximum Your theory is pretty much right, pressure head includes the height of the plume or fountain, but may be flow losses in the head itself. The foam head can be self limiting because of two things: 1. Internal restrictions 2. External loss due to turbulent output The head has pressure loss to produce the foam effect. Therefore there is back pressure, which shows up as flow somewhere else in the system. In other words, the water comes out someplace else if it can. If it can't then the pump efficiency drops off to dump the power; it cavitates. * -- LittleScooby ------------------------------------------------------------------------ posted via www.GardenBanter.co.uk |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks. I went to that websight but I still get lost. How about I just post the info of what I'm thinking of getting. I'm thinking of getting the Oase Aquarius 2000 pump which is rated at 2000 GPH. I'm going to be hooking it up to an Oase 1 inch Frothy fountain nozzle which supposedly has a maximum hieght of 44 inches when used with the Aquarius 2000 running at maximum. What do you think the average flow rate would be for this setup? http://tinyurl.com/5dra9 http://pondusa.com/heads2.htm bluegill phil wrote: *Here is some data. I have one of these pumps, but only for about 5 months. So far its doing good. It has a baldor motor which are good motors. Ive worked with them in manufactoring for years along with Reliance. I know of some of these motors that have been running continus duty for over 20 years http://tinyurl.com/4hle8 On 20 Jul 2004 05:39:35 -0700, (Crashj) wrote: LittleScooby wrote in message ... So if my pump is maxed out with no restrictions, and the foam jet fountain head is only 2 feet in the air because the pump can't make the head any higher because it's running at maximum Your theory is pretty much right, pressure head includes the height of the plume or fountain, but may be flow losses in the head itself. The foam head can be self limiting because of two things: 1. Internal restrictions 2. External loss due to turbulent output The head has pressure loss to produce the foam effect. Therefore there is back pressure, which shows up as flow somewhere else in the system. In other words, the water comes out someplace else if it can. If it can't then the pump efficiency drops off to dump the power; it cavitates. * -- LittleScooby ------------------------------------------------------------------------ posted via www.GardenBanter.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What size pump??? | GoldLexus | General | 3 | June 16th 04 05:30 PM |
Have you ever measured real water pump output flow rate? | Pszemol | Reefs | 26 | January 19th 04 04:33 AM |
Pump, sump and elbow on the intake | Pszemol | Reefs | 6 | January 3rd 04 01:18 AM |
pump heat transfer; recommendations ? | Kevin M. Smith | Reefs | 2 | October 11th 03 11:43 PM |
I need a good water pump for my pond | Carlos Falcon | General | 1 | August 16th 03 02:19 AM |