![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Anybody have any advice on how to succesfully break one of the most fundamental rules in fishkeeping......? I must assume that I have a dead adult (~10cm long) Pseudotropheus Acei in my 240 litre Malawi aquarium. The fish looked decidedly off colour for a day, and disappeared. The tank is quite heavily stocked (not initially, but the way the critters breed (especially the Labidochromis) - and hide (catching impossible)!) and filtered by a large 3 basket Eheim external canister filter (~1000lph) and a 25W UV filter. The tank has 2 remaining Pseudotropheus acei, uncountable Labidochromis Ceruleus (5-6 adults, many juveniles), 4 Pseudotropheus Kingsizei, 4-5 adult and many juvenile Iodotropheous sprengerae and a pair of ancistrus. In a nutshell I cannot find the missing fish. The entire back wall is built up of stacked pumice and limestone which is glued in. Removing this wall will necessitate a complete tank emptying and strip down. Suffice to say I have poked a torch / hand into every accesible hole and moved every rock that I dare. Short of emptying the tank, my options on finding the fish are closed. I have two options, the complete tank strip down, or to try and ride the tank through the inevitable decomposition. I am hoping to manage the latter. My plan: 1. Reduced feeding, the fish will be fed once every three days instead of daily. 2. Increased and forced oxygenation (airstone + extra eheim powerhead). 3. Daily 30% water changes. 4. Monitoring - I use anyhow an ammonia alert in the tank, and will start doing daily nitrite and nitrate readings. I am guessing that 2 weeks should be sufficient time for the fish to completely decompose, and intend to follow the above regime for that time (comments?). The filter is due a clean (~1month since the last one), but since it is still fast flowing I feel it best not to disturb its bacterial population whilst the biological load will be rising. Any advice welcomed, especially from someone who has practical experience of managing something like this. Am I worrying too much, or not enough? Cheers, Gary Whitehead. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary Whitehead" wrote in message
... Hi, Anybody have any advice on how to succesfully break one of the most fundamental rules in fishkeeping......? I must assume that I have a dead adult (~10cm long) Pseudotropheus Acei in my 240 litre Malawi aquarium. The fish looked decidedly off colour for a day, and disappeared. The tank is quite heavily stocked (not initially, but the way the critters breed (especially the Labidochromis) - and hide (catching impossible)!) and filtered by a large 3 basket Eheim external canister filter (~1000lph) and a 25W UV filter. The tank has 2 remaining Pseudotropheus acei, uncountable Labidochromis Ceruleus (5-6 adults, many juveniles), 4 Pseudotropheus Kingsizei, 4-5 adult and many juvenile Iodotropheous sprengerae and a pair of ancistrus. In a nutshell I cannot find the missing fish. The entire back wall is built up of stacked pumice and limestone which is glued in. Removing this wall will necessitate a complete tank emptying and strip down. Suffice to say I have poked a torch / hand into every accesible hole and moved every rock that I dare. Short of emptying the tank, my options on finding the fish are closed. I have two options, the complete tank strip down, or to try and ride the tank through the inevitable decomposition. I am hoping to manage the latter. My plan: 1. Reduced feeding, the fish will be fed once every three days instead of daily. 2. Increased and forced oxygenation (airstone + extra eheim powerhead). 3. Daily 30% water changes. 4. Monitoring - I use anyhow an ammonia alert in the tank, and will start doing daily nitrite and nitrate readings. I am guessing that 2 weeks should be sufficient time for the fish to completely decompose, and intend to follow the above regime for that time (comments?). The filter is due a clean (~1month since the last one), but since it is still fast flowing I feel it best not to disturb its bacterial population whilst the biological load will be rising. Any advice welcomed, especially from someone who has practical experience of managing something like this. Am I worrying too much, or not enough? Cheers, Gary Whitehead. I can only tell you my expectations, someone else can judge it. At 350-400 litres, a 10cm fish will not make much of an impression to a tank's biology, so I just don't overfeed and keep a watch for the corpse (as it gets lighter, it might come loose from wherever it wedged itself). At 240 litre, I'm a bit more worried about the biological load, but I would still be tempted to take a low key approach (don't overfeed, don't mess with the filters, watch for the corpse to appear). You can check the ammonia level every couple of days, but ordinarily, an established bacterial culture should not have too much trouble expanding to the requirements of a single corpse. If anything, be a bit more diligent in your gravel vacuuming for a month (it's a similar decay which you don't want adding to the total). -- www.NetMax.tk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the advice.
I now definitely have signs of a dead fish, oil on the water surface (fixed by switching in the surface sucker), bits (yuch), some smell (for once the cleaning siphon is loaded from the tap, I am not sucking on it!). Main filter not touched, added the powerhead and another small canister filter loaded with carbon - which I am hoping will remove some of the organics and smell (I am working on the basis that if it is more comfortable for us, it will also be for the fish). To date ammonia and nitrites OK (as far as I can tell from the colour chart, close to zero on both). Fish are hungry, arerated and 30% water changes ongoing... I will let you know what happens. Cheers, Gary. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NetMax" wrote in message m...
be sufficient time for the fish to I can only tell you my expectations, someone else can judge it. At 350-400 litres, a 10cm fish will not make much of an impression to a tank's biology, so I just don't overfeed and keep a watch for the corpse (as it gets lighter, it might come loose from wherever it wedged itself). At 240 litre, I'm a bit more worried about the biological load, but I would still be tempted to take a low key approach (don't overfeed, don't mess with the filters, watch for the corpse to appear). You can check the ammonia level every couple of days, but ordinarily, an established bacterial culture should not have too much trouble expanding to the requirements of a single corpse. If anything, be a bit more diligent in your gravel vacuuming for a month (it's a similar decay which you don't want adding to the total). I agree with this response, as usual NetMax rocks. If the tank is well established and well maintained, you won't notice any changes whatsoever and everything will be normal. --Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HELP massive fish die-off | Bill K | General | 7 | July 23rd 04 01:40 PM |
Parasite | Graham Ramsay | General | 8 | July 9th 04 09:42 AM |
My Red Fish is Sick - I Think He is Dying! | jstass | General | 7 | May 17th 04 01:26 AM |
Effect of too many fish | Jim Morcombe | General | 19 | February 14th 04 12:37 AM |
Removing ammonia from "baby" fish tank | Tony | General | 7 | September 2nd 03 02:33 AM |