![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am about three months into starting my first reef tank. It is 120 gallons
and I am using an aquaspacelight with (2) 250W metal Halide bulbs and (2) 24W Blue lights. I have noticed that these lights along with all the pumps etc. have almost doubled ny electric bill. Are VHOs any more efficient. In otherwords does anybody know whether it would require the same amount of electricty to produce 500 watts of light regardless of whether it is VHO or metal halide. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
500w is 500w. Option #2 is to remove your roof and use the
sun. ![]() Marc david wrote: I am about three months into starting my first reef tank. It is 120 gallons and I am using an aquaspacelight with (2) 250W metal Halide bulbs and (2) 24W Blue lights. I have noticed that these lights along with all the pumps etc. have almost doubled ny electric bill. Are VHOs any more efficient. In otherwords does anybody know whether it would require the same amount of electricty to produce 500 watts of light regardless of whether it is VHO or metal halide. -- Personal Page: http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html Business Page: http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com Marine Hobbyist: http://www.melevsreef.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "david" wrote in message nk.net... I am about three months into starting my first reef tank. It is 120 gallons and I am using an aquaspacelight with (2) 250W metal Halide bulbs and (2) 24W Blue lights. I have noticed that these lights along with all the pumps etc. have almost doubled ny electric bill. Are VHOs any more efficient. In otherwords does anybody know whether it would require the same amount of electricty to produce 500 watts of light regardless of whether it is VHO or metal halide. 500 watts is the amount of electricity, or power to be more specific, that the bulbs are consuming to produce light. What you really want is light output or intensity, usually measured in lumes, lux or candles. As a comparison you're asking for a car that attain the speed of 10 MPG when you really want to know how fast the car goes and you should be asking how many miles per hour it can go. Generally speaking fluorescents, such as T8, T5 and VHO bulbs are somewhat more efficient than metal halide and much more efficient than traditionnal incadescent bulbs. But the lighting is different with fluorescents. The light is more difuse and you don't get that shimmering effect you get with MH. Two things you may consider. Using a combination of fluorescents and MH. Keep half of the MH running, 250W, for about 4-5 hours a day and replace the other with about 125 watts of actinic and T5 fluorescent lighting. That way your peak consumption will be 375 watts for 4-5 hours and down to 125 for the rest. Most corals do fine with this combination. The other is that MH give off lots of heat. This may very well offset your heating costs in the winter which means your electric bill will only really be higher during the summer. Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The other is that MH give off lots of heat. This may very well offset your heating costs in the winter which means your electric bill will only really be higher during the summer. Robert Hmmm, which would be a bad thing here where the air conditioning bills run higher than the heating bills.... Cindy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wrong, Halides are more efficient than Fluorescent bulbs. The heat in a
halide is more concentrated so it seems more inefficient, but it's not. jb "Robert Cadieux" wrote in message ... "david" wrote in message nk.net... I am about three months into starting my first reef tank. It is 120 gallons and I am using an aquaspacelight with (2) 250W metal Halide bulbs and (2) 24W Blue lights. I have noticed that these lights along with all the pumps etc. have almost doubled ny electric bill. Are VHOs any more efficient. In otherwords does anybody know whether it would require the same amount of electricty to produce 500 watts of light regardless of whether it is VHO or metal halide. 500 watts is the amount of electricity, or power to be more specific, that the bulbs are consuming to produce light. What you really want is light output or intensity, usually measured in lumes, lux or candles. As a comparison you're asking for a car that attain the speed of 10 MPG when you really want to know how fast the car goes and you should be asking how many miles per hour it can go. Generally speaking fluorescents, such as T8, T5 and VHO bulbs are somewhat more efficient than metal halide and much more efficient than traditionnal incadescent bulbs. But the lighting is different with fluorescents. The light is more difuse and you don't get that shimmering effect you get with MH. Two things you may consider. Using a combination of fluorescents and MH. Keep half of the MH running, 250W, for about 4-5 hours a day and replace the other with about 125 watts of actinic and T5 fluorescent lighting. That way your peak consumption will be 375 watts for 4-5 hours and down to 125 for the rest. Most corals do fine with this combination. The other is that MH give off lots of heat. This may very well offset your heating costs in the winter which means your electric bill will only really be higher during the summer. Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clam in blastomussa, now what lighting? | Brad | Reefs | 3 | January 19th 04 02:09 AM |
Lighting - starting over | Henry | Reefs | 3 | January 5th 04 03:33 AM |
Lighting for pond in Basement | Mickey | General | 5 | September 27th 03 11:48 PM |
Need help deciding lighting system. | Bill Beam | Plants | 0 | September 3rd 03 03:10 AM |
Yet another lighting question... | Danae | Plants | 1 | August 12th 03 11:46 AM |