![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've got an Aquaclear 300, which lets me pretty much stuff in bags of
anything I want into it. It's currently filtering a 46 gallon bowfont tank with water parameters and fish appropriate for a South American flooded forest biotope. The pH is closer to neutral than what is supposed to be ideal, but it works well enough for the fish and invertebrates. After having my tank for a half year, the shrimp, snail, and corys have laid plenty of 'treats' for the other residents of the tank- which I take as another sign that the residents are quite happy. (In fact, I've lost no fish since I've had the tank, but have lost one AppleSnail and a half dozen ghost shrimp.) Finally, the tank is lightly planted and lit dimly, but the duckweed and hornwort are more than happy enough as is. I use two sponges to sandwich an activated carbon insert, and it seems to be working great- which is why, of course, I want to perturb the equilibrium :-) So, my question is- when I the activated carbon insert change comes up, is there an benefit at all to using peat instead? Current residents: Hornwort Duckweed 5 Silver Hatchet Fish 5 Harlequin Rasboras 6 Cardinal Tetras 6 Neon Tetras 3 Albino Corydoras aeneus 3 Otoclinus affinis 6 Ghost Shrimp 1 Apple Snail (Pomacea bridgesii) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Thomas" wrote in message ... I've got an Aquaclear 300, which lets me pretty much stuff in bags of anything I want into it. It's currently filtering a 46 gallon bowfont tank with water parameters and fish appropriate for a South American flooded forest biotope. The pH is closer to neutral than what is supposed to be ideal, but it works well enough for the fish and invertebrates. After having my tank for a half year, the shrimp, snail, and corys have laid plenty of 'treats' for the other residents of the tank- which I take as another sign that the residents are quite happy. (In fact, I've lost no fish since I've had the tank, but have lost one AppleSnail and a half dozen ghost shrimp.) Finally, the tank is lightly planted and lit dimly, but the duckweed and hornwort are more than happy enough as is. I use two sponges to sandwich an activated carbon insert, and it seems to be working great- which is why, of course, I want to perturb the equilibrium :-) So, my question is- when I the activated carbon insert change comes up, is there an benefit at all to using peat instead? Current residents: Hornwort Duckweed 5 Silver Hatchet Fish 5 Harlequin Rasboras 6 Cardinal Tetras 6 Neon Tetras 3 Albino Corydoras aeneus 3 Otoclinus affinis 6 Ghost Shrimp 1 Apple Snail (Pomacea bridgesii) peat bags in the filter will make your water a bit more acidic however as soon as the peat is exhausted then the PH will climb back up. If things are working well now why bother changing it?. I would do away with the carbon insert which after a few days just becomes a bag that acts as a mechanical filtration and add another sponge or some bio max rings. Rick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
peat bags in the filter will make your water a bit more acidic however as
soon as the peat is exhausted then the PH will climb back up. It will only climb back up as a result of water changes with harder water. Treating water with peat (in or out of the tank) basically drops the Kh. A lower Kh gives a lower Ph at a constant level of CO2 i.e. it basically removes the buffer from the water and its a permanent change. If things are working well now why bother changing it?. Indeed I would do away with the carbon insert which after a few days just becomes a bag that acts as a mechanical filtration and add another sponge or some bio max rings. Agreed. I. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the advice, all. Pretty much what I'd thought, but its nice
to get a sanity check. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iain Miller" wrote in message ... peat bags in the filter will make your water a bit more acidic however as soon as the peat is exhausted then the PH will climb back up. It will only climb back up as a result of water changes with harder water. Treating water with peat (in or out of the tank) basically drops the Kh. A lower Kh gives a lower Ph at a constant level of CO2 i.e. it basically removes the buffer from the water and its a permanent change. snip well then I guess don't do water changes and maintain the same PH and KH. So let me clarify , when the peat becomes exhausted AND you do a water changes using tap water which I assume is harder water or why would you be using peat, your PH and KH will rise and unless you are testing constantly you will not know when this is occurring. Rick |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
peat moss question | Limnophile | General | 3 | June 10th 04 02:27 AM |
Canister filters and the use of peat in a South American tank | Birru Morgan | Plants | 2 | April 25th 04 05:08 PM |
Changing Filtration in established tank. | Glenn Serpas | General | 5 | January 10th 04 03:04 AM |
use peat to reduce pH? | Shawn | General | 3 | August 21st 03 11:20 AM |
HELP needed: Pond filtration & Filter media in Montreal | MIke | General | 0 | July 22nd 03 08:34 PM |