![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boog, what I'm confused about here is, you only have 1 coral
and it's a hardy coarl at that. So perhaps your tank setup and no water changes ... "bo0ger1" .@. wrote on Sat, 02 Dec 2006: If you have a question regarding the science I have mentioned in responses above OR science I have not mentioned, I will try and explain things to you. You're radically overestimating your own level of scientific knowledge. You don't seem to appreciate that reef tanks are as much an engineering enterprise (or even artistic) as they are science. This is why we care about demonstrated results, not just your unusual theories. You CLAIM that water changes are not necessary for reef tanks, but in fact all you offer are your theories on what science would support your strategy. What you never acknowledge is the possibility that biochemistry may be going on that you are NOT aware of. (And you can't possibly know 100% of the biochemical needs of 100% of reef organisms.) But most important, you've never DEMONSTRATED success with your approach in a reef tank. You started with your hypothesis (water changes are not necessary in a reef tank), and you lept right to believing the conclusion (all you reef tank fools that do water changes are wasting your time), but you've missed the most important part: the actual experiments. You're a horrible scientist. That's why, when you finally broke down and admitted that in reality you had only a fish-only tank, and just in the last few weeks got your very first coral (and a hardy one at that), nobody is very impressed. EVERYONE knows that there is much more challenge is successfully growing difficult (e.g. stony) corals over a long period of time (e.g. years), than in just doing a fish-only tank, or a hardy coral for a couple of weeks. Lots of bad strategies seem just fine in a short time period or without sensitive corals. If you want to be taken seriously as a scientist, try to learn the difference between hypothesis and conclusion, and maybe you should keep quiet until you've got some actual evidence. Especially when your theories contradict the practice of real reef keepers, who -- unlike you -- have actually demonstrated success with sensitive corals over a long period of time. -- Don __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Don Geddis http://reef.geddis.org/ Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick it once and you will suck forever. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
goldfish question | [email protected] | General | 29 | January 30th 06 05:59 AM |
Starting off a planted tank -- starting one (or maybe) two strikes down.... | [email protected] | Plants | 1 | November 9th 05 01:31 AM |
PHYSICAL symptoms of overstocking | Gfishery | General | 26 | April 15th 05 09:38 PM |
HELP massive fish die-off | Bill K | General | 7 | July 23rd 04 01:40 PM |
Advice on my new tank plan | richard reynolds | General | 2 | August 2nd 03 08:08 PM |