A Fishkeeping forum. FishKeepingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishKeepingBanter.com forum » ponds » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

legal issues and frogs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 9th 05, 01:07 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm not an attorney but....

This would be covered under local ordinances and so would be different
for everyone. You cannot say that since you cannot control wildlife you
aren't responsible. Townships protect the rights of their citizens
and the values of their houses. If you create a public nuance or do
something to lower the value of surrounding homes then most certainly
the township would sue you under some ordnance (or enact one if you
****ed them off). Imagine if I left a rotting cow in my back yard and
then the area got swarmed by rats. Now whether or not frogs chirping is
a public nuance is up for debate. In rural America I HIGHLY doubt you'd
be in trouble (small number of ordnances). In suburban America you
might be in violation (crazy city folk control freaks move there and
make ordnances). In the city you probably are.

Now to your question, the neighbors can sue your friend in civil court
and if the noise is bad they could prossibly win. All they need to do
is convince the judge that your firend caused the noise (which they
did, they built a man made pond). They would however have to prove
damages if they wanted money which would be pretty hard, but they could
just ask the judge to make them remove the pond. Or the judge could
have a pond or like nature and tell the people to buzz off.



Sam

  #2  
Old April 10th 05, 12:05 AM
kathy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks Hank and Sam for your responses!
The pond owner went out and catch a bunch of the males
last night. Poor little guys, they were just following what mother
nature told them to do.

kathy :-)

  #3  
Old April 10th 05, 01:35 AM
Reel McKoi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"kathy" wrote in message
oups.com...
Thanks Hank and Sam for your responses!
The pond owner went out and catch a bunch of the males
last night. Poor little guys, they were just following what mother
nature told them to do.

kathy :-)

=====================
I hope he relocated them and didn't perform the "monster mash" on them.
:-( This spring we have a lot less frogs for some reason. We didn't do
any spraying and have no real close neighbors. By now I usually see spawn
in the uncovered pools - but nothing! The last few nights I didn't even
hear the two that were calling for sweeties for the past few weeks. Maybe
another large snake moved in.... but then even the spring peepers at our
neighbor's stock pond were scarce this year.
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o

  #4  
Old April 10th 05, 07:49 AM
~ jan JJsPond.us
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I hope he relocated them and didn't perform the "monster mash" on them.
:-( This spring we have a lot less frogs for some reason. We didn't do
any spraying and have no real close neighbors. By now I usually see spawn
in the uncovered pools - but nothing! The last few nights I didn't even
hear the two that were calling for sweeties for the past few weeks. Maybe
another large snake moved in.... but then even the spring peepers at our
neighbor's stock pond were scarce this year.


No, it is I, who apparently have neighbors not decent enough to talk
directly (or even send an unsigned personal letter) first. They went
straight to complaining to the city.

I caught 9 and a club member coming by for free baby koi took them to her
house. I think there are 3 left and I'm hoping that is good enough for
these people, may they get infected with West Nile, and choke on gnats all
summer. Bitter, me? No of course not.

Your comment about the snakes though, a cybersister said I need to put up a
note that says: Due to "someone" complaining about the frogs and the city
threatening me with fines, I have turned loose several LARGE, but quiet,
snakes to eat them. Please be advise to keep your small pets contained till
the noise problem is resolved. ~ jan

~Power to the Porg, Flow On!~
  #5  
Old April 10th 05, 01:10 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Make sure you get the ordinance that they say you violated and read it.
Just because the city sent it doesnt mean that someone in the city
isn't reading the ordinance incorrectly. This happens all the time. Its
best to know your rights.

Sam

  #6  
Old April 14th 05, 07:10 AM
~ jan JJsPond.us
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Make sure you get the ordinance that they say you violated and read it.
Just because the city sent it doesnt mean that someone in the city
isn't reading the ordinance incorrectly. This happens all the time. Its
best to know your rights.
Sam


The City Attorney attach it to the letter, and it mentions "animals" not
pets and the word "harboring" which I guess would be having a place for
said animals to hang out and make noise. Course I wonder if this
"harboring" would also include the evergreen trees the noisy magpies so
love to make nests in and they can be very early risers in the AM. Would
people have to harass the magpies to leave, or chop down their trees, if
someone complained?

To give an update on my situation. I delivered, as one friend said, a
tactful, yet educational letter, to my neighbors within ear shot of the
pond. Since it went out I have heard from 4 neighbors in positive support.
One of which sent me such a wonderfully worded E-mail I ask, and he
consented, to let me send it to the City Attorney's office. I would really
like to see them reconsider taking the time & money to bother people about
native species when the complainers haven't done all they could to alieve
the situation without involving the authorities. The results would have
been the same whether it was a simple note on my door or an official letter
from the CA's office. I would have removed frogs to lower the volume.

Course I am one who is going to take it to the limit, as far as keeping as
many as I can before peopled are "bothered". That "magic" number I will
work towards next year. Since I removed 9 of 12, I'm hoping I could at
least keep 6, since 3 hardly croak enough, most likely because they are too
"busy". But dang, I bet I've made them the happiest frogs on the planet
this summer. beg ~ jan

~Power to the Porg, Flow On!~
  #7  
Old April 10th 05, 03:54 PM
Reel McKoi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"~ jan JJsPond.us" wrote in message
...
I hope he relocated them and didn't perform the "monster mash" on them.
:-( This spring we have a lot less frogs for some reason. We didn't do
any spraying and have no real close neighbors. By now I usually see

spawn
in the uncovered pools - but nothing! The last few nights I didn't even
hear the two that were calling for sweeties for the past few weeks.

Maybe
another large snake moved in.... but then even the spring peepers at our
neighbor's stock pond were scarce this year.


No, it is I, who apparently have neighbors not decent enough to talk
directly (or even send an unsigned personal letter) first. They went
straight to complaining to the city.


## Arrrggggg! Don't ya just hate people like that? I must say the
neighbors I do have (we all have 1 to 5 acres so aren't too close) are
great. Not one complaint yet about the ponds, the frogs, lawn mowers, the
motorcycles... nothing. :-)

I caught 9 and a club member coming by for free baby koi took them to her
house. I think there are 3 left and I'm hoping that is good enough for
these people, may they get infected with West Nile, and choke on gnats all
summer. Bitter, me? No of course not.


## May the fleas of a thousand camels infest their crotch.

Your comment about the snakes though, a cybersister said I need to put up

a
note that says: Due to "someone" complaining about the frogs and the city
threatening me with fines, I have turned loose several LARGE, but quiet,
snakes to eat them. Please be advise to keep your small pets contained

till
the noise problem is resolved. ~ jan


## There you go! Uh, ....add CHILDREN to that. That should work....
LOL!!! :-D
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o

  #8  
Old April 11th 05, 07:24 PM
Derek Broughton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

~ jan JJsPond.us wrote:

Your comment about the snakes though, a cybersister said I need to put up
a note that says: Due to "someone" complaining about the frogs and the
city threatening me with fines, I have turned loose several LARGE, but
quiet, snakes to eat them. Please be advise to keep your small pets
contained till the noise problem is resolved. ~ jan


I like that...
--
derek
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rec.ponds FAQ Snooze General 7 April 11th 05 07:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishKeepingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.