![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Make sure you get the ordinance that they say you violated and read it.
Just because the city sent it doesnt mean that someone in the city isn't reading the ordinance incorrectly. This happens all the time. Its best to know your rights. Sam |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Make sure you get the ordinance that they say you violated and read it.
Just because the city sent it doesnt mean that someone in the city isn't reading the ordinance incorrectly. This happens all the time. Its best to know your rights. Sam The City Attorney attach it to the letter, and it mentions "animals" not pets and the word "harboring" which I guess would be having a place for said animals to hang out and make noise. Course I wonder if this "harboring" would also include the evergreen trees the noisy magpies so love to make nests in and they can be very early risers in the AM. Would people have to harass the magpies to leave, or chop down their trees, if someone complained? To give an update on my situation. I delivered, as one friend said, a tactful, yet educational letter, to my neighbors within ear shot of the pond. Since it went out I have heard from 4 neighbors in positive support. One of which sent me such a wonderfully worded E-mail I ask, and he consented, to let me send it to the City Attorney's office. I would really like to see them reconsider taking the time & money to bother people about native species when the complainers haven't done all they could to alieve the situation without involving the authorities. The results would have been the same whether it was a simple note on my door or an official letter from the CA's office. I would have removed frogs to lower the volume. Course I am one who is going to take it to the limit, as far as keeping as many as I can before peopled are "bothered". That "magic" number I will work towards next year. Since I removed 9 of 12, I'm hoping I could at least keep 6, since 3 hardly croak enough, most likely because they are too "busy". But dang, I bet I've made them the happiest frogs on the planet this summer. beg ~ jan ~Power to the Porg, Flow On!~ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rec.ponds FAQ | Snooze | General | 7 | April 11th 05 07:04 AM |