A Fishkeeping forum. FishKeepingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishKeepingBanter.com forum » ponds » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

legal issues and frogs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 10th 05, 01:10 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Make sure you get the ordinance that they say you violated and read it.
Just because the city sent it doesnt mean that someone in the city
isn't reading the ordinance incorrectly. This happens all the time. Its
best to know your rights.

Sam

  #2  
Old April 14th 05, 07:10 AM
~ jan JJsPond.us
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Make sure you get the ordinance that they say you violated and read it.
Just because the city sent it doesnt mean that someone in the city
isn't reading the ordinance incorrectly. This happens all the time. Its
best to know your rights.
Sam


The City Attorney attach it to the letter, and it mentions "animals" not
pets and the word "harboring" which I guess would be having a place for
said animals to hang out and make noise. Course I wonder if this
"harboring" would also include the evergreen trees the noisy magpies so
love to make nests in and they can be very early risers in the AM. Would
people have to harass the magpies to leave, or chop down their trees, if
someone complained?

To give an update on my situation. I delivered, as one friend said, a
tactful, yet educational letter, to my neighbors within ear shot of the
pond. Since it went out I have heard from 4 neighbors in positive support.
One of which sent me such a wonderfully worded E-mail I ask, and he
consented, to let me send it to the City Attorney's office. I would really
like to see them reconsider taking the time & money to bother people about
native species when the complainers haven't done all they could to alieve
the situation without involving the authorities. The results would have
been the same whether it was a simple note on my door or an official letter
from the CA's office. I would have removed frogs to lower the volume.

Course I am one who is going to take it to the limit, as far as keeping as
many as I can before peopled are "bothered". That "magic" number I will
work towards next year. Since I removed 9 of 12, I'm hoping I could at
least keep 6, since 3 hardly croak enough, most likely because they are too
"busy". But dang, I bet I've made them the happiest frogs on the planet
this summer. beg ~ jan

~Power to the Porg, Flow On!~
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rec.ponds FAQ Snooze General 7 April 11th 05 07:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishKeepingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.