Where can you post a complaint about a moderator?

Bob Casanova wrote:
On 13 Apr 2005 19:45:08 -0700, the following appeared in

Wrong. He blocked *crossposts* to those groups if t.o was
one of the groups (which he has a perfect right to do).

As mentioned a moderator can do whatever he wants. which is the point
of the thread. It is nice to know, that you admit that their is content
moderation. thanks...

wrote:
Bob Casanova wrote:

On 13 Apr 2005 19:45:08 -0700, the following appeared in

Wrong. He blocked *crossposts* to those groups if t.o was
one of the groups (which he has a perfect right to do).


As mentioned a moderator can do whatever he wants. which is the point
of the thread. It is nice to know, that you admit that their is content
moderation. thanks...


Regulating crossposts is *not* content-moderation, no matter how many
times you say so, you pathological liar.

-- Kizhe

There was no WMD in Iraq neither, So yet the USA invaded anyway to
bring democracy to that country, while Saudi Arabia, Women can't go to
a decent university and the constitution is the Koran.. And the saudis
are american allies. 90 mile from the american peninsula of florida
lies Cuba, and yet they are not free.. but Iraq and Afhganistan is..

Justification is wonderful eh?

Lt. Kizhe Catson wrote:
wrote:
Bob Casanova wrote:

On 13 Apr 2005 19:45:08 -0700, the following appeared in

Wrong. He blocked *crossposts* to those groups if t.o was
one of the groups (which he has a perfect right to do).


As mentioned a moderator can do whatever he wants. which is the
point
of the thread. It is nice to know, that you admit that their is
content
moderation. thanks...


Regulating crossposts is *not* content-moderation, no matter how many

times you say so, you pathological liar.

-- Kizhe

wrote:
There was no WMD in Iraq neither, So yet the USA invaded anyway to
bring democracy to that country, while Saudi Arabia, Women can't go to
a decent university and the constitution is the Koran.. And the saudis
are american allies. 90 mile from the american peninsula of florida
lies Cuba, and yet they are not free.. but Iraq and Afhganistan is..

Justification is wonderful eh?

I gather you think (and I use the term very loosely) there is some
parallel between US geo-political propaganda, and t.o moderation rules?
You're a loon AND a liar. But we already knew that.

-- Kizhe

Lt. Kizhe Catson wrote:

wrote:

Bob Casanova wrote:


On 13 Apr 2005 19:45:08 -0700, the following appeared in

Wrong. He blocked *crossposts* to those groups if t.o was
one of the groups (which he has a perfect right to do).


As mentioned a moderator can do whatever he wants. which is the

point

of the thread. It is nice to know, that you admit that their is

content

moderation. thanks...


Regulating crossposts is *not* content-moderation, no matter how many


times you say so, you pathological liar.

-- Kizhe

On 14 Apr 2005 19:09:23 -0700, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by :

And now the JabbersMonkey makes a 90-degree turn at high
speed and loses his lunch all over his monitor...

There was no WMD in Iraq neither, So yet the USA invaded anyway to
bring democracy to that country, while Saudi Arabia, Women can't go to
a decent university and the constitution is the Koran.. And the saudis
are american allies. 90 mile from the american peninsula of florida
lies Cuba, and yet they are not free.. but Iraq and Afhganistan is..

This was in response to (from Kizhe)...

Regulating crossposts is *not* content-moderation, no matter how many
times you say so, you pathological liar.

Ain't incomprehension wonderful?

--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

Damn. I keep forgetting I'm reading/replying to this JabberSpew in
rec.ponds, not t.o. Apologies to fellow ponders for continuing it in
the former group. I'll be more careful from now on.

Lt. Kizhe Catson wrote:
wrote:

Bob Casanova wrote:


On 13 Apr 2005 19:45:08 -0700, the following appeared in

Wrong. He blocked *crossposts* to those groups if t.o was
one of the groups (which he has a perfect right to do).


As mentioned a moderator can do whatever he wants. which is the point
of the thread. It is nice to know, that you admit that their is content
moderation. thanks...



Regulating crossposts is *not* content-moderation, no matter how many
times you say so, you pathological liar.

-- Kizhe

wrote:
Bob Casanova wrote:
On 13 Apr 2005 19:45:08 -0700, the following appeared in

Wrong. He blocked *crossposts* to those groups if t.o was
one of the groups (which he has a perfect right to do).

As mentioned a moderator can do whatever he wants. which is the point
of the thread. It is nice to know, that you admit that their is
content
moderation. thanks...

Does it ever occur to your feeble mind that every time you post this
silly claim, you're proven to be a liar?

On 14 Apr 2005 14:57:45 -0700, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by :


Bob Casanova wrote:
On 13 Apr 2005 19:45:08 -0700, the following appeared in

Wrong. He blocked *crossposts* to those groups if t.o was
one of the groups (which he has a perfect right to do).

As mentioned a moderator can do whatever he wants. which is the point
of the thread. It is nice to know, that you admit that their is content
moderation. thanks...

No, moron, there *isn't* content moderation; there are
restrictions on crossposting. You can post any sort of
garbage you want *here*. And you can post any sort of
garbage you want *elsewhere*. You just can't combine the two
if you're too lazy or too stupid to click a mouse twice
instead of once. If you're too dim to understand the
difference that's *your* problem.

And I notice you failed to address my main point, which you
carefully snipped unmarked:

"You're perfectly free to post your garbage directly to the
groups in question with no intervention by DIG."

--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless